@Rightanglenews Attacking someone with explosives is not protest , it’s attempted murder. Hoping she recovers fully and that those responsible are held accountable.
@davesgoldman@SpaceX@chadgibbs88 Haha, congrats David! What an awesome team moment that photo says it all. Love seeing the real camaraderie behind the big stuff. SpaceX and Starlink changing the game together is pretty damn inspiring. Keep punching out those wins (just maybe not in the face )
Arizona State University filed to use eminent domain to steal a 124 year old Phoenix home from a senior homeowner
The man who owns it is a 89 year old senior citizen who’s owned the home for 50 years
ASU says they need the land for their downtown health campus
ASU made multiple purchase offers, they’ve offered up to $850,000 for the home. The homeowner keeps refusing. So now they plan to just take the home with eminent domain
If eminent domain goes through he’ll be forced to accept the appraisal price
The FBI had boxes full of serial killer confessions they couldn’t actually use.
Hours of interviews.
Detailed admissions.
Direct conversations with some of the most violent men in America.
And none of it was scientifically useful.
Then a 42-year-old psychiatric nurse walked into Quantico and changed criminal investigation forever.
Her name was Ann Burgess.
1975.
FBI agents Robert Ressler and John Douglas had spent months traveling across the country interviewing imprisoned serial killers. They believed understanding offenders could help solve future crimes.
But when Ann Burgess listened to the tapes, she immediately saw the problem.
“This isn’t research,” she told them.
��These are just stories.”
The room went silent.
“You’re asking them to talk about themselves,” she said. “But every interview is different. There’s no structure. No methodology. You can’t compare one offender to another.”
Then she asked a question nobody else in the room had thought to ask:
“Tell me about the women they killed.”
Not the killers.
The victims.
Who were they?
How old were they?
Where were they approached?
What made them vulnerable?
How did the offender gain control?
The agents were confused.
Ann Burgess explained something revolutionary:
“If you truly study the victims, you’ll understand the offender.”
At the time, Burgess was already a groundbreaking trauma researcher. In 1974, she had co-authored one of the first major studies proving rape caused lasting psychological trauma — at a time when courts barely acknowledged it.
She helped create the term “rape trauma syndrome.”
Now she brought that same scientific rigor to the FBI.
She redesigned the interviews.
Created structured questionnaires.
Introduced victimology as the foundation of profiling.
Distinguished between a killer’s “MO” and their “signature.”
Mapped escalation patterns.
Explained that sexual violence was about power and control — not desire.
Suddenly, the FBI’s Behavioral Science Unit had something it had never truly possessed before:
Methodology.
And it worked.
In 1983, young boys began disappearing in Nebraska.
Using Burgess’s framework, investigators built a profile:
A young white male.
Slight build.
Someone trusted around children.
Likely connected to scouting or youth activities.
A person who kept souvenirs and detective magazines.
Police arrested John Joubert.
The profile was astonishingly accurate.
Almost overnight, criminal profiling became legitimate law enforcement science.
And yet most of the credit went elsewhere.
The public celebrated the FBI agents.
Books were written.
Movies and television series followed.
Ann Burgess became a footnote.
When Netflix released Mindhunter, they based a character on her — but changed nearly everything.
They made her a psychologist instead of a nurse.
Changed her personal life entirely.
Most viewers never even realized she was based on a real person.
Meanwhile, the real Ann Burgess kept working.
Teaching.
Publishing.
Consulting.
Testifying in court.
Training professionals around the world.
More than 150 academic publications.
Multiple landmark books.
Decades of pioneering work.
And through all of it, one truth remained:
Modern criminal profiling exists in large part because a psychiatric nurse walked into a room full of FBI agents and told them they were asking the wrong questions.
Not:
“Why did the killer do this?”
But:
“Who were the victims?”
That shift changed criminal investigation forever.
Ann Burgess is 88 years old now.
Still teaching.
Still working.
Still brilliant.
And finally receiving recognition not as a side character in someone else’s story —
But as herself.
The woman who taught the FBI how to truly understand predators by first understanding the people they harmed.
Attacking someone's faith or what they eat just makes us look small and distracts from the real fight. Talarico's record on open borders, pushing men into women's sports, and the socialist policies hurting Texas families that's what voters actually care about. Staying focused on the issues is how we win.
🚨 NOW: Former Border Patrol Commander Greg Bovino has been spotted by FANS at Newark International Airport
Bovino is a patriot who truly only wants one thing: MASS DEPORTATIONS.
God bless @GregoryKBovino 🙏🏻🇺🇸
White Tesla Cybertruck driver is driving around with anti-Elon Musk stickers and a sticker that calls for Donald Trump to be assassinated
In all caps it says “Is he dead yet?”
License plate number CHRYET
We have to stop letting calling for assassinations be normalized and tolerated. When did this become acceptable in America
We can’t have people driving around of our freeways calling for the President of our country to be murdered, especially after at least 5 assassination attempts by liberals
This feels like one of the clearest examples of the justice system being hijacked by politics and media pressure. The book sounds like a must-read for anyone wanting the full, unfiltered evidence instead of the edited narrative we all saw. What’s the single most overlooked piece of evidence from the trial or autopsy that convinced you (or the author) beyond any doubt that Chauvin was following protocol and didn’t cause the death?
This genetically modified tick story is next-level disturbing. Bill Gates’ foundation dropping millions into engineering self-spreading ticks that could spread into the wild raises serious questions about unintended consequences and oversight. Whether you liked him before or not, this kind of thing should concern everyone. Hope more people start paying attention and demanding real transparency on these projects.