@FragglerockR @TheDUIGuyPlus I am a woman. I do not recognize myself in any of this descriptions.. I don't take it as for all women.. If you support her you can do without searching for meanings that are not there. It's just him expressing what he thinks about her after all she did to him. Thats all.
cheers
@Catmom32220611 @TheDUIGuyPlus So you think it's ok and justified for you to use: "You are disgusting and vile" to describe someone. But when he's describing her for the "disgusting and vile" things she did somehow is not ok anymore? Funny people :)
@CeeAllTheBees @Neylan92 @boyVilliam @bartlett_tree @linkedupshow @fairlyfuct There is plenty of evidence that she lied on the stand in 3 countries now.. 2 believed her, one is investigating perjury already (based on evidence) the 3rd one found her guilty of defaming (lying) We shall see abt UK. You dodging & twisting to not see it is another story
@louise122884@WeekesPrincess I don't know your story at all, All I said is you can't be walking in her shoes because she lied. If anything what I am saying is kind as not doubting your story but stressing it's not hers. As I said don't fear truth. I am sorry you're so deep into her lies so you can't see that
@louise122884@WeekesPrincess It is real life & it's scary how many people believe a lie with a shallow review of evidence. Nothing backs up her story. But again I am not here to argue with anyone who believes her it will take a while for some to see, for some it will never happen. Just your story isn't hers!
@louise122884@WeekesPrincess It can't be you in her shoes. She lied.
And there was plenty of evidence that she did.
So no, can't be you in her shoes, your story is your story. Never fear truth, that's what this whole trial was about. I don't hate her, she needs help. I hope she gets it.
@jjthinker56 @ThatBrianFella And you do dissect each and every little thing in both + also their witnesses ... there's plenty of research on somewhat related subjects that can also help you do that. And should you do that you will land on pretty much: he never hit her.
@jjthinker56 @ThatBrianFella Deep not shallow! Shallow: Oh he drank & used drugs - must of hit her
Deep: yeah he drank & used drugs - but throughout his whole life almost. Individuals are affected differently by those & affect doesn't change. If you get aggressive you always do. His isn't, no history of it/4
@jjthinker56 @ThatBrianFella You, if you're anything close to thinker, start doubting the credibility of that accuser. Then you should dissect both side's character and life history to maybe search for behaviour that would further support one or the other side in your thinking process.. Deep dissect! /3
@jjthinker56 @ThatBrianFella You need to go see what evidence there is that perhaps shows that you did. So then when the person that's accusing have been proven beyond any shadow of a doubt to have lied about bunch of things, that also their "evidence" do not match at all what they tell it should prove /2
@jjthinker56 @ThatBrianFella I don't know what proof would you have if someone you spent say 5 years with lies that you've hit them. But you will for sure start by saying it never happened . Then as having proof you've never hit someone is weird to have or never having done anything is weird to have.. /1
@DrProudman When you lie and you tell a fake story you're acting. You don't have to be actor to be acting. It makes perfect sense. It was her acting in that case, not him.
She said she's pledging. She didn't say she's already donated it.
Just to be clear Amber started using "pledge" only after court decision showed she didn't donate. Long after she should've already donated everything. Once again your own arguments harm Amber. Ty!
#JOHNNYDEPPWINS
Notice that Lizzo is "pledging" $500k because that's how people talk when they "donate" huge amounts of money to charity. (And fuck yeh, kudos to Lizzo).
@Rudy78417576@EmilyKrebs6 And the birds and the bees discussion has nothing to do with the discussion about the right of a woman to have abortion if that's what the woman wants.
@CasablancasGrl I also appreciate the humanity in the post. But I disagree. She allowed for faked evidence be presented, which for me is matter of integrity.. you defend your client ok.. but not that. Also she went to further defame him in interviews on tv.. that's not part of her job. She lied
Funny how some people talk and tweet about the First Amendment until someone says something they don't like. That's the thing about speech. The answer to speech you don't like is not censorship - it's more speech. @YouTube https://t.co/aZqyjg858T
Honest living? Lying for 6 years? faking abuse for 6 years? Go give speeches about DV on false grounds?
YOU TALK FOR HONEST LIVING?? You compare Amber's lies to people who report on them & call her out? You're out of your mind yet again !
#JusticeForJohnnyDepp#AmberIsALiar
Were you aware that so-called YouTube journos like That Umbrella Guy make THAT much (ie $1m per year) making up bullshit and obsessively posting videos about Amber, her family and friends, including me? Is that an honest living to you? He's about to move onto Evan Rachel Woodโฆ
* as consequence of having used that freedom of speaking the wrong way, defaming someone, lying faking evidence and whatnot and ruining that someone's life. And when people point out the lies and call the liar out you call it coordinated hate... No, we just fight for justice.
There's a difference between being a controversial public figure and attracting organic hate as a consequence of having the freedom to use your voice, and being a controversial public figure and attracting coordinated hate apropos of nothing and losing the freedom to your voice.