>"riot just needs to hard reset the ladder"
>ladder gets a hard reset
>its worse than before
>"riot just needs to hard reset the ladder"
i can't man
@DarkHarvest26@drewlevin@RiotPhreak@RiotPhroxzon They are aware of this but unfortunately longer queue time are not viable for streaming. They have a huge focus on making sure League is a good experience for streamers/stream viewers
@HAHAHHXADHHXD@riotgames@RiotSupport He's not wrong? If there is a shitty mechanic that gatekeeps new players, it doesn't matter if 0.001% of players "use it every game"
@Nadir_D_Lechero@Pivotless True but they won't be. Riot already said they aren't going back to -30 +10 and would rather have the cutoff be extremely high. It's not possible to have thousands of master players between 0-400 LP when they're all gaining +/-30
@icelandichero@pentaless@drewlevin I just want consistency. It feels awful that they can ban whoever they want and interpret the rules however they want.
It is absolutely insane to me that @Pentaless gets hit with a main account ban because @drewlevin finds a poor example of him losing a game one time as Trundle on a new account that he hand-leveled, but Jynxzi gets a free pass because he's a huge streamer that's promoting League. The bias couldn't be more obvious. #firedrewlevin
I have nothing against jynxzi but I wholeheartedly believe that everyone streamer or not should be held accountable by the same rules
Jynxzi is playing on an account that he did not level himself which is a bannable offense for anyone and he should receive the same @drewlevin