@shadowwarscast@ICallahan1966@Mr_Husky1 It's also very difficult to find a 1000 sqft home in a nice neighborhood with good schools and low crime in a suburb or a medium sized city. Full stop.
@xQwirk But they look like you'd expect a highly educated and highly political liberal boomer would look. Their hairstyle, type of eyeglasses, style of clothing and mannerisms scream boomer laptop class. What exactly did you think he meant when pointing out their appearance?
@WillRicci "Oh, but what if the Dems take power, they'll use the precedent to..." Knock it off. Just stop. Everybody with a brain knows the dems do whatever they want whenever they have power. They don't worry about precedents, they just do things.
@WillRicci Oh look, here it is.
โWe canโt do this thing that is extremely popular bc the democrats might do a thing theyโre going to do anywaysโ
Fxcking retarded, idiotic low brow thinking
Just spiritually weak and pathetic
@TBerlaga Most European countries actively discourage family rearing as a national interest while importing infinite migrants. So your point makes little sense in reality. Trump is actively pursuing family a rearing as a key national interest, hence his multipronged approach toward it
@TBerlaga Republicans must make efforts to redirect the conversation and national conscience towards marriage and family rearing. Most of Europe, save for counties like Poland have made zero effort towards making raising a family more affordable or a national interest. In fact,
@TBerlaga It is without question that Dems will increase welfare spending whenever they are in power, hence the need to address the current budget as it stands with what measures we can implement now. Overall reductions to welfare spending must be addressed via Congress and not the Exec.
@TBerlaga@michaeljknowles The current proposal does not add any further debt, it simply reshuffles debt already planned. If your position is that this opens an opportunity for future expansion under democrat fuel, your point is moot because they would do so anyways.
@17Jefferson76@megbasham Do you actually believe that they won't do that regardless of where Republican presidents direct the funds? Do you actually believe that completely defending it via Congress is possible this year? Come with solutions that actually make sense
@MeidahlSteve@ChuddyMc@megbasham So you're saying we should continue the losing strategy of being obstructionist on principle while the Dems funnel money to front orgs rather than repurpose toward families? Sounds like you support the further degradation of society because "muh principles."
@LeviBDavenport@AccolonsMetal@RickeySpanish23@megbasham Republicans have lost almost every election following a gov shutdown. They poll terribly with the voting public. Hence the back and forth during the last gov shutdown that solved nothing. We need creative solutions vs being an obstructionist on principle.
@megbasham@AFKHuckleBerry We should do so as that will benefit our goals of rebuilding the nuclear family. Most average voters would rather see waste in the military, intelligence, and healthcare programs handled before they see a program like this cut.
@megbasham@AFKHuckleBerry Megan, it's amazing how many rightwing folks in the thread are arguing around your point and fail to see your logic. There is no cutting this program as even Republican-elected officials are afraid to touch it. If we can redirect a portion of it to the nuclear family.
@DrAilaRudd@DrNeilStone This is such a nothing burger. Maybe Africans can make their own maps that place greater emphasis on areas of the world that are of importance to them and their trade? Why should American or European map makers be forced to create scale 2D maps just for the sale of fairness?
@karolinazebel@megbasham Are you retarded? The church has lower incidence rates despite the many atheists like yourself that look to out it. Public education has higher incidence rates despite many like you who try to rewrite what defines child predation.