Justin

[Justin @Nope_1984]

@mrmeech1707 Again, I don't see the correlation. You don't want ICE Agents "gunning down citizens" and offer no example of where an armed ICE Agent walked up and performed the Judge Dread... Show me that, and I'll agree with you.

What you have are citizens obstructing law enforcement.

[Justin @Nope_1984]

@mrmeech1707 2/2 That's why I began with intent behind the comment of "masked thugs."

While I agree that Hasan Piker is a brain dead streamer, ignoring the fact that he is highly influential amongst the progressive left, and that some of his views are dangerous is intellectually dishonest.

[Justin @Nope_1984]

@mrmeech1707 1/2 This is why I made the comment regarding "masked thugs." You call them judge, jury, and executioner; yet it's all part of due process.

The law makers create the law (Immigration Law). ICE enforces those laws (Law Enforcement). Interfering with this process is a crime.

[Justin @Nope_1984]

@mrmeech1707 However, the issue I have taken is political pundents using the same line of "why did he bring a gun to a protest" that was used against Rittenhouse.

[Justin @Nope_1984]

@mrmeech1707 I am willing to review all the ICE involved shootings that you are mentioning, I'll provide my opinion in DM rather than another long form post. Without much dig, I can tell you that the only shooting I have found that I've taken issue with is Pretti...

[Justin @Nope_1984]

@Price1_Xx302xX @krassenstein @iisisaldaiine I knew I heard that term somewhere else... The great Clayton Bigsby!

[Art @ZarkFiles]

The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision.
That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there.
Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level.
Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline.
The case proceeded anyway.
The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence.
Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict.
An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.

Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.

[Justin @Nope_1984]

Yeah...

https://t.co/KwUrChB3Y8

[Justin @Nope_1984]

@QTRBlackGarrett

[Justin @Nope_1984]

@ResisttheMS Now do Pennsylvania

[Justin @Nope_1984]

@DOGE__news I'm not a bitch...

[Justin @Nope_1984]

@mrmeech1707 Agree again. I'm interested in the 14th Amendment decision.

[Justin @Nope_1984]

@mrmeech1707 is the Executive Branch, then we need to see what powers Congress gave to the overseer. I think that's what Trump is breaking and it's really hurting the brains of everyone. If you gave the Executive oversight of CPB; then the Executive can make orders regarding it's funding.

[Justin @Nope_1984]

@mrmeech1707 I would suppose this would be in congresses purview; I would have to read the specific legislation regarding CPB to see who has oversight. I think that's what is being missed a lot. Congress created the organization and gave oversight to someone. If that someone...