Notorious F.I.S.H 🏳️‍🌈

🚩 Dare to Struggle, Dare to Win 🚩

[Spectra 😈👻 VCVLT 𖤐 @spectrademonica]

retweet this if your space is safe for trans people! 🏳️‍⚧️💜

[Charlie is so tired @MooXProductions]

retweet if you’d rather eat human flesh than SA someone

[Fuck Every Word 2.0 @fckeveryword]

fuck ice

[🌜heresvix🌛 @heresvix]

Somewhere in the middle

[FurryFollowing @FurryFollow1ng]

REPOST FOR TRANS RIGHTS!!! :3

[Daniel Lismore @daniellismore]

Why People Are Trans, What Biology Actually Says

Everyone begins the same way.

In the very first weeks after conception, there is no male or female body. Every human embryo follows the same early plan. At about five weeks of development the fetus still has the same set of tissues, the genital ridge and two duct systems that could become male or female organs. Even the nipples form before hormones that create sexual difference appear. That is why everyone has them.

Between weeks six and twelve, genes and hormones begin steering development. A gene on the Y chromosome called SRY can switch on production of testosterone in the testes. If it activates and the fetus’ cells respond strongly, male anatomy begins to form. If it does not, female anatomy develops by default. But this process is never all-or-nothing. Timing, hormone levels, receptor sensitivity, and countless small genetic variations can change how the body or brain develops.

Those variations are natural. They produce what biologists call sexual differentiation, not a simple binary. Intersex people, around 1.3 million in the UK alone, are living proof that human sex traits can overlap or differ from textbook categories. Some have XY chromosomes but develop ovaries; others have XX chromosomes but higher testosterone; some have combinations that don’t fit either. This is ordinary human biology.

Brain development follows a similar path. During pregnancy, the brain is shaped by the same hormones that guide the body, but in some people the two do not match perfectly. Decades of neuroscience show subtle structural and functional differences between typical male and female brains. Research published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2019, 20:725–735) found that in transgender women, several brain regions more closely resemble female patterns than male ones. That means their sense of identity is rooted in biology, not imagination.

So being trans is not a trend, a phase, or a social contagion. It is a natural expression of the way human development works.

Across cultures and history, societies have recognised more than two genders, from hijra in South Asia to Two-Spirit people in Indigenous America to fa’afafine in Samoa. What modern science adds is an understanding of how this diversity arises: through ordinary variation in genes, hormones, and brain organisation.

Large-scale studies confirm that gender-affirming treatment can ease suffering. Access to puberty blockers, hormone therapy, or supportive healthcare is linked with dramatic reductions in depression and suicidal thoughts. The Trevor Project’s 2023 report found trans youth with access to gender-affirming care were 73 percent less likely to attempt suicide. The Endocrine Society and the World Health Organization both recognise this care as medically necessary.

Yet misinformation keeps spreading, claims that biology is simple, that sex can be determined only by chromosomes, that people can be “made trans” by culture. Real biology says otherwise. Even chromosomes are not absolute: some women have XY; some men have XXY; others have mosaic patterns of both. What matters for lived reality is how bodies and brains develop, not a single letter on a lab report.

If you have ever wondered why trans people exist, the answer is right there in nature. Every embryo starts the same. Hormones and genes push development in different directions. Sometimes the brain and the body don’t line up perfectly, and that is part of what makes humanity so varied and complex.

Trans people are not against nature, they are nature. They exist because of biology.

[Gay Frog 🏳️‍⚧️ @DemonessChara]

waow

[Rebekka Timmer @RebekkaTimmer]

Op Internationale Vrouwendag moet het niet gaan over ‘glazen plafonds’. Een vrouwelijke CEO berooft haar werknemers net zo hard als een mannelijke CEO.

Laten we spreken over oorlog, onderdrukking, kapitalisme, imperialisme. De grootste bedreigingen voor de vrouw wereldwijd.

[LGBTQ Shrink @DrRonHolt]

This is a welcoming account. 🏳️‍⚧️

[🌜heresvix🌛 @heresvix]

Discovery
(Part 12)

[Kia 🧸ྀི @xevekiah]

“I don’t understand why women don’t just report it if it really happened.”
When I was 19, I reported mine. I had bruises. Hospital photos. Text messages of him apologizing the next morning. My friends drove me to the station because I could barely stop shaking. I thought evidence would make it simple. I thought truth would be enough.
Months later, I was the one on trial. His lawyer printed my Instagram photos and held them up in court. Asked why I wore crop tops. Asked why I drank that night. Asked why I didn’t scream louder. He replayed my police interview and pointed out every time I hesitated, every time I cried, every time my timeline wasn’t perfectly linear. “If it was traumatic,” he said, “why can’t she remember clearly?”
Sitting there while strangers debated my pain like it was a group project felt like being stripped again. My messages were projected on a screen. My body was described in detail. My character was picked apart like that was the real crime.
He walked out on bail. I walked out with panic attacks.
That’s why some women don’t report. Because even with bruises. Even with screenshots. Even when you do everything “right.” You still have to survive the assault twice, once in private, and once in public, just to maybe be believed.

[Nadia Whittome MP @NadiaWhittomeMP]

There is no LGB without the T. We rise together and we fall together.

Part of my speech in Parliament for LGBTQ+ History Month:

[Conscious Lee @TheConsciousLee]

Exploring the “Trans Panic Defense”…

[Zafar Macha @Maaachaaa69]

BREAKING NEWS: Rowan Atkinson, a legendary icon of comedy, television, and cinema, has left even the world’s richest and most powerful figures stunned—not just with his words, but with decisive action.
At a glamorous red-carpet gala in Los Angeles on December 20, attended by film moguls, tech billionaires, and Hollywood’s most elite stars, Rowan Atkinson took the stage to receive a Lifetime Achievement Award. But instead of offering a conventional acceptance speech, he chose a moment of truth—direct, fearless, and deeply human.
He did not thank the Academy. He did not reminisce about Mr. Bean, Blackadder, or decades of global laughter. Instead, Atkinson looked straight into the audience of wealth and influence and declared:
“We sit here surrounded by diamonds and artistic glory while the world outside is falling apart. If your voice can move millions and you choose not to use it for those who have no voice, then you are not creating change—you are creating noise.”
The room fell into complete silence. Film executives and invited guests sat motionless, struck by the weight of his words. He continued, unwavering:
“If you have more than you need, it no longer belongs only to you. Your responsibility is to lift up those who are still beneath you.”
And he did not stop at words.
That very night, Atkinson announced that all profits from his archived works and future creative projects—estimated at 160 million USD—will be donated to fund children’s health initiatives, climate action programs, and arts education for underprivileged youth.
His message was unmistakable:
“Legacy is not built on what you earn. It is built on what you give.”
In an era when celebrities are often dismissed as hollow symbols, Rowan Atkinson delivered a powerful reminder to the world:
true impact is not created by applause, but by easing the suffering of others.

[Cordelia may love🧸 @cordeliamaylove]

Lesbians having a higher divorce rate is due to higher marriage rates and a stronger commitment to monogamy. Additionally, lesbians report the highest levels of relationship satisfaction, which reflects their unwillingness to remain in unfulfilled relationships. A thread 🧵

[Kia 🧸ྀི @xevekiah]

a woman in Ireland went into the hospital smiling.
she was miscarrying, but she still had a heartbeat.
the fetus didn’t.
the doctors said it out loud: nonviable.
she asked for an abortion anyway because she could feel her body turning on her.
she was bleeding. she was in pain. she was terrified.
the nurse said:
“as long as there’s a heartbeat, we can’t.”
she begged:
“so you’re waiting for what?”
and the doctor said, calmly:
“nature.”
“nature” was her fever spiking overnight.
“nature” was her organs shutting down one by one.
“nature” was her husband holding her hand while she vomited and shook and cried.
she whispered:
“please. don’t let me die.”
the hospital told her:
“we’re monitoring.”
she died anyway.
and after, everyone acted shocked like this wasn’t exactly what the policy was designed to do.
they called it a “medical tragedy.”
but it was murder with paperwork.

[The Dr. @gatesisthedevil]

🚨 THEY’RE LITERALLY TELLING US THE PLAN OUT LOUD 🚨

JD Vance just went on Megyn Kelly and flat-out called nationwide judicial injunctions “ILLEGITIMATE.”

Translation: Any judge who tries to block mass deportations, border shutdowns, or whatever executive hammer they drop next… they’re planning to IGNORE or steamroll.

This isn’t “draining the swamp.”
This is PREPPING TO DRAIN THE CONSTITUTION.

Everything lines up perfectly before November midterms:

- Door-to-door ICE sweeps already teased
- “Administrative warrants” to bypass 4th Amendment pushback
- Calling checks & balances “illegitimate” on air
- Epstein files conveniently “released” to swamp the news cycle

They’re not even hiding the takeover blueprint anymore.
Consolidate power → neuter courts → secure the House & Senate → lock it in before voters can course-correct in ‘26.

Call it coup, call it “America First 2.0,” call it whatever — but the architecture is being built RIGHT NOW.

Who else sees the timeline clicking into place?
Drop a 🔥 & RT if you’re not going to allow it to happen.

[Novara Media @novaramedia]

Transgender women athletes have no advantage over cisgender women, a study in the British Journal of Sports Medicine has found.

The researchers found that there was no evidence “to justify blanket bans” on trans women competing in women’s sport and that the data doesn’t support “inherent athletic advantage theories”.

The pooled data analysis of 52 studies on 6,485 people considered strength, fitness and body composition of trans women receiving gender-affirming hormone therapy.

Trans women were found to have more lean mass (a proxy for muscle), but there were no observable differences in upper or lower body strength, or in a key measure of cardiorespiratory fitness – maximal oxygen consumption – between trans and cis women.

The researchers said: “Although the current data do not justify blanket bans, critical gaps in literature were found, notably the under-representation of transgender athletes who may retain more ‘muscle memory’.”

They added that more long-term and high-quality studies are needed to “prioritise performance-specific metrics in transgender athletes” but the “scarce number” of trans people in elite sport makes this difficult.

The inclusion of trans women in women’s sports has been a key issue for anti-trans campaigners.

Last year, the Football Association banned trans women from taking part in women’s football in England, and the England and Wales Cricket Board banned trans women from all levels of women’s cricket.

This came after the UK supreme court ruled in April 2025 that the legal definition of a woman under the Equality Act is based on biological sex.

[Ese thee nutritionist @itschargiee]

Episode 48: The serving order says it all

This video explores how gender roles shape food distribution within families.

#omgwithese