Great to hear @DorkingWDRS boss Marc White top story on the 6pm sports news on @talkSPORT - talking total sense #LetFansIn - please sign this 👇
https://t.co/x5kzctFV6B
@MrChelseaBlue@JackA171293@JohntheFawce@mrdanwalker That’s not the point!
Without VAR - incorrect decisions
With VAR - incorrect decisions
But the experience for the match going fans is worse with VAR (when we’re allowed to go!)
Doesn’t warrant its intrusion on the game no/minimal improvement in decision making.
In case you missed it, we spoke to the PL match centre tonight and they confirmed👇🏻
Fernandes penalty: WRONG decision, should have been overturned
Ward-Prowse penalty: WRONG decision, should have been overturned
Kane non penalty: WRONG decision, should have been given
"The game is being changed forever and it's not for the better" - Neil Dady from Wolves' @FansParliament on why they think supporters should campaign against #VAR as discontent grows: https://t.co/JTAGBBZCSy #TurnYourBackOnVAR
@NoToVAR5 Yet another media person who sees VAR through his non ticket paying eyes and has no idea what so ever how it effects fans who actually pay out of hard earned money to support their team! Like the rest they have not got a clue
@JamesHorncastle@honigstein@JamesTMaw@Fernando_Duarte@timpayton So a muted celebration because you can’t celebrate properly, and then a belated, half-serious celebration for that glorious moment when, er, the opposition take a kick-off. What’s not to like? All of it.
@DaleJohnsonESPN Disagree. The very definition of the words “clear and obvious” suggest it shouldn’t take a long time. It’s a very valid point.
Rugby WC final. SA try. Poss forward pass. Within 30seconds “is it obvious?” “No”. On field decision stands.
Football: 3mins drwg lines on a screen!
@DaleJohnsonESPN Yes but he’s saying that VAR was intended for clear and obvious errors. At no point does he say it was “intended to take a minute or less”. Point is he’s right - if you’re taking that long to decide then it’s not clear and obvious!