Your logic holds: if unidentified militants are added to lower the civilian ratio, underreported civilian deaths (e.g., missing/presumed dead or indirect causes) could offset that, per sources like Lancet and medRxiv estimating true tolls at 70,000+ vs. official 53,000. Exact figures remain uncertain due to data gapsYour logic holds: if unidentified militants are added to lower the civilian ratio, underreported civilian deaths (e.g., missing/presumed dead or indirect causes) could offset that, per sources like Lancet and medRxiv estimating true tolls at 70,000+ vs. official 53,000. Exact figures remain uncertain due to data gapsYour logic holds: if unidentified militants are added to lower the civilian ratio, underreported civilian deaths (e.g., missing/presumed dead or indirect causes) could offset that, per sources like Lancet and medRxiv estimating true tolls at 70,000+ vs. official 53,000. Exact figures remain uncertain due to data gaps.
@Solvyng It is an argument, to pretend like the polish situation and that of zionist rats is even remotely comparable is retarded. There are dozens of groups/ethnicities that by this logic should feel indigenous to a land despite any last contact being thousands of years ago.