Visiting Humberton P. Guggenheimer Chair, Professor of Global Societal Dynamics at the School of International Studies, Université Internationale de Zurich
How do I know that the climate *crisis* is a scam?
Here are five reasons:
1️⃣ None of the politicians, celebrities, or “scientists” yammering about it have altered their lifestyles by an inch. If they opted to forgo using O&G products, then I’d take them seriously. Actions speak louder than words.
2️⃣ Climate conferences aren’t being held virtually on Zoom using their large meeting extensions. It’s doable, they just choose not to. They like to fly overseas to lecture us about reducing our “carbon footprint” all the while they do nothing to lower their own.
3️⃣ Wealthier alarmists are still living on or buying oceanfront property. If ocean levels were really rising at a catastrophic rate (as opposed to the gradual increase that is actually occurring), then they would move inland and banks would not approve loans.
4️⃣ Alarmists rarely, if ever criticize China and India, and they always come up with all sorts of wonderful excuses as to why those nations get a free pass to continue emitting so-called “carbon pollution.”
5️⃣ The only solutions they offer involve increased governmental power. Higher taxes. EV mandates. Restrictions or bans on the energy sectors they don’t like.
And, as an added bonus, no real-world data proves, much less suggests that we are facing an “existential crisis.” Even the IPCC doesn’t use such rhetoric because it isn’t based on science.
@Kaiserin_fcb@sentinl_grave Don't worry, Europoor, all you have to do is buy some air conditioning and then your IQ might surpass that of the average Somalian again
https://t.co/ItHXTU6MXV
"For every degree above 25°C (77°F), our cognitive performance declines by around two percent. And if synapses suffer, so does economic activity. At 30°C (86°F), office performance drops by almost 9%." https://t.co/EhHAiX9kt0
Like many others, I have been alarmed by the success of certain politicians in our country who identify as extreme socialists or communists.
This is not a matter of classical liberals triumphing over standard-issue conservatives; this is the victory of people who stand athwart the fundamental principles that undergird our country.
There are many reasons why I detest Communism, but I want to draw attention to just one issue of supreme importance.
Karl Marx said that the first critique is the critique of religion. He meant that, before a complete re-working of the politics and economics of a society can take place, religion has to be taken down.
This is because religion, as he saw it, is the “opium of the masses,” a drug taken to dull our sensitivity to the suffering caused by economic exploitation. As long as the suffering populace is lured into complacency by fantasies about God's providence and the promise of eternal life, they will never rise up and throw off their chains.
But there is a second reason why the elimination of religion is of paramount significance for Marx.
Communism aspires to be a totalizing system, involving the government's control over education, entertainment, communication, politics, and especially economics.
What stands resolutely athwart this ambition is religion, which declares that all of these societal expressions are finally under the judgment of God. So, if you want Communism to succeed, religion has to be stamped out.
If you doubt me on any of this, I would encourage you to read the recent histories of China, Russia, Cuba, Nicaragua, Vietnam, Cambodia, and Venezuela. Revisit those histories and tell me I'm wrong about the attack on religion.
Might I encourage my fellow believers in God not to be complacent in the face of this very troubling development in the American body politic?
Ive said this before and I'll say it again: all real libertarians have long since become right wing nationalists, the only "Libertarians" left are schizophrenic anarcho-liberals who want to be able to sell heroin to 5 year olds.
This is the dumbest round of discourse.
If I'm driving faster, I get there faster, you fucking retard.
It's like numbers don't even matter to these "people".
@Kaiserin_fcb@sentinl_grave You said that Nazis aren't German, which they clearly are. This is a redefinition and everybody knows it, which is why you're being ratioed so badly.
"For every degree above 25°C (77°F), our cognitive performance declines by around two percent. And if synapses suffer, so does economic activity. At 30°C (86°F), office performance drops by almost 9%." https://t.co/EhHAiX9kt0
I’m going to be raked over the coals for this, but the Pete Buttigieg story doesn’t pass the smell test for me. From a PR perspective, the cynic in me thinks he’s getting ahead of something. There’s usually more to a story. I’ve always been fair when it comes to Pete. He was unqualified to be Secretary of Transportation, but I haven’t taken cheap pot shots at him for clicks.
As for this CPS story, Pete’s a former cabinet secretary and very well connected. I find it hard to believe a random visitor would arrive and start calling shots on him and his children. He just rolled over for a social worker with a badge? Out of the blue? Oh hi come on in? Pete is one of the most well-connected golden boys of the elite class. This is someone with the most powerful lawyers and friends in his phone… at the drop of a hat. He opened the door for a stranger and suddenly his kids are being shuffled away for the night? As we move toward the 2028 primary, many of these contenders will be airing things out with carefully crafted spin. Look at every story with a healthy dose of skepticism.
CPS, like many other agencies, is flawed. Of course. But the way this story is framed raises questions. Maybe this was some kind of warning shot. I’d be curious what kind of deals and calls Pete’s had recently. Praying for the family.
EXCLUSIVE 🚨 Fort Worth, Texas - On June 27, 2026, at Trinity Pride Fest in Fort Worth, Texas, street preachers Richard Penkoski and David Grisham were subjected to multiple violations of their First Amendment rights while attempting to preach on public property.
Upon arrival, they were immediately met by Fort Worth police officers who blocked their access to the public street and sidewalk, threatening both men with arrest for trespassing if they entered the area. When Grisham reminded officers that he had previously sued the City of Fort Worth in 2014 over this exact issue - a lawsuit that resulted in a settlement and an official apology from the city - the officer dismissed the prior case, stating, “I don’t care, you can file whatever lawsuit you want.”
After being forced outside the barricades, the confrontation escalated as multiple officers allegedly threatened to cite the men based on the subjective reactions of attendees. A female officer stated they would be cited if they said anything “offensive.” When Penkoski responded that offensive speech is protected under the Constitution and is not a crime, the officer claimed it fell under disorderly conduct, stating, “Well, yes, that is the conduct.”
Another officer further confirmed that citations would be based solely on whether others were offended. When Penkoski asked whether calling a biological male a “male” would result in a citation if someone took offense, the officer responded that if he continued doing so and someone found it offensive, he would be cited. Penkoski also pointed out that he was deeply offended by half-naked men walking around children at the event, but the officer dismissed the complaint, responding, “There’s really not much I can do about that.”
During the encounter, Penkoski pulled up and directly showed an officer established U.S. Supreme Court precedent confirming that the government cannot prohibit citizens from accessing traditional public forums such as streets and sidewalks simply because a private group holds a permit. Although the officer acknowledged the information by responding, “Huh,” he continued enforcing the restriction. (This video will be in the thread)
As officers repeatedly pushed the preachers farther away from the event, David Grisham was ultimately issued a citation for “unreasonable noise.” When asked to explain what constituted unreasonable noise under the circumstances, officers were unable to provide a clear definition, vaguely suggesting it could involve “sticking a megaphone in someone’s ear” - which Penkoski states did not occur, as the megaphone was held at waist level - or simply offending people.
When the officers were asked how they justified suppressing the constitutional rights of Christians and veterans who fought for the country, they offered no meaningful objective explanation. As a veteran who was willing to die defending American liberties, Penkoski said he found it deeply alarming that a Christian preacher in modern America could be threatened with arrest and cited while standing on public property simply because his message offended those listening.
The best part about this is Canada is also hosting and we've not heard a single positive thing about Canadian cities from European tourists. The only thing we've seen is complaints about the dirty streets, heroin needles everywhere and rude indians ruining the experience.
Decades of hostile liberal foreign propaganda dispelled in a matter of weeks.