Kiwi Nut

🇳🇿🇦🇺🇺🇸🇮🇱 I’m not a Jew, I simply support the truth.

[Kiwi Nut @NutternzCrypto]

@OurielOhayon Why it takes so long to deport this mf?

[Kiwi Nut @NutternzCrypto]

@Pivotonian1838 Haha last season pic, I haven’t been back to Highton for ages.

[David Hollyoake @Holly_Da]

Australia is being eaten alive from the inside by a hideous virus called Islamo-Marxism, under the banner of pro-Palestiniasm.

The 'silent-majorty' had best wake up before their freedom, democracy and values go down the gurgler of Socialism or Shariah Law.

[Kiwi Nut @NutternzCrypto]

Such a well worded letter.

[Great British PAC 🇬🇧 @GreatBritishPAC]

What an embarrassment our British Wheelchair Basketball team are. They turned backs during the Israeli national anthem. We fund them £4,925,000 to compete with dignity, NOT to insult, embarrass, and undermine. A letter from our CEO:

[Rukshan Fernando @therealrukshan]

At its core, the Pro-Palestine movement is an anti-Australian movement. To recognise the legitimacy of Australia is to recognise Israels legitimacy. That is why they hate the Aussie flag. If you are still blind to this, you are just a useful idiot.

[Kiwi Nut @NutternzCrypto]

Ruled by fear

[Dan Burmawi @DanBurmawy]

Why do Muslims react violently to free speech?

I have a two-year-old child. Like any toddler, he eats messily, food all over his hands, his mouth, and sometimes the furniture.

I find it unbearable. I keep wiping his face after every bite. I scold him if he touches food with his hands, and if he spills anything on the couch, I react like it's a crisis. I lose my temper. I act as if the mess is a personal offense.

For a long time, I told myself I was just a clean person. I said I valued order and hygiene.

But my wife, who is a psychologist, helped me see something else entirely.

When I was a child, my mother used to beat me and my brothers if we made a mess while eating. We were expected to eat quietly, cleanly, fearfully. Every bite came with the risk of being slapped if we got a stain on the furniture.

That fear became a part of me. Now, years later, I am no longer a child, but the child in me is still afraid, and my son is the one paying for it.

Islamic theology, as presented in the Qur'an and Hadith, presents Allah as a feared master. Open any page of the Qur'an, and you will find threats of punishment, fire, torment in the grave, humiliation in the afterlife.

Allah monitors, warns, and punishes. The believer is trained to live in a constant state of fear.

That fear becomes internalized. It gets encoded deep in the psyche. When Muslims see someone else speak freely, draw Muhammad, criticize the Qur'an, or write a book that challenges Islam, they do not react only out of offense. They react out of trauma.

They don’t know why they are furious. They don’t understand the depth of their panic. They think they are defending their Prophet, honoring their religion, protecting sacred ground.

But subconsciously, they are doing what they were trained to do: stopping the source of danger. Silencing the voice that could bring down the wrath of God on them all.

It’s not zeal. It’s fear.

That’s why free speech is met with violence, not because Muslims are uniquely sensitive, but because they are deeply conditioned by an image of God who rules by threat.

The psychological cost of that image is heavy, and it’s not only Muslims who pay it, but everyone who dares to speak freely around them.

[Bob @Shariakill]

“Epistemic injustice”

Ex-Muslim about the Islamist victimhood bait

[Kiwi Nut @NutternzCrypto]

@forwardtopeace So for short, any platform that encourages critical thinking or proper analysis will be pro-Israel as the truth speaks for itself. Any platform that focusses on quick buck and click farms will be pro-Palestine.

https://t.co/k9g5iROFMv

[Kiwi Nut @NutternzCrypto]

@forwardtopeace Insta is insane. Try Youtube.

[Kiwi Nut @NutternzCrypto]

@travelingclatt 70 years of lies.

[Kiwi Nut @NutternzCrypto]

@TheHarrisSultan Not even suicidal empathy. He just worries about the Muslim voting blocks, if the asylum policy becomes strict, he will lose his seat.

[David Collier @mishtal]

May 2025 - UN refuses to help deliver aid to Gaza.

August 2025 - UN blames Israel for famine in Gaza

Don't be fooled. We are witnessing the largest propaganda campaign in history. These people and NGOs don't care about Palestinian lives - this is all about demonising Israel.

[Kiwi Nut @NutternzCrypto]

Wants to go communist 🤣🤣🤣 who tf comes up with this kind of idea, must be Purple Pingle.

[Rukshan Fernando @therealrukshan]

A research think tank has suggested taxing Australian homeowners for unused bedrooms in their homes.

The thesis appears to be that if taxes were applied to unused bedrooms, it would encourage people to move into housing with the appropriate number of rooms or to downsize, thereby freeing up more dwellings to help address the housing shortage.

Who are the people coming up with these "ideas", and what should happen to any politician who even considers adopting such measures?

[Kiwi Nut @NutternzCrypto]

Support my home country, actually the same choc bar in Woolies NZ is $7.69.

[Kiwi Nut @NutternzCrypto]

Dude must be from NZ 🥝

[Kiwi Nut @NutternzCrypto]

@CopyOfOne Well said. Most Western people don’t know or don’t care. It’s just the Western governments pandering to the Muslim voting block.

[LSPD's Finest גְּדַלְיָהוּ 🇺🇸🇳🇬🇮🇱🎮🎸 @CopyOfOne]

Unless you're a Jihadist or Far Leftist, supporting the Palestinian Cause is an own goal from every angle.

As a Christian or Jew, supporting the Palestinian cause means believing that God's promises to Abraham, Jacob, Isaac are conditional or obsolete, or denying the basics of being Jewish (a connection to the land of Israel).

As a secular liberal, it means supporting an oppressive, theocratic, ultra conservative religious dogma that steps on every right and principle you value. Women's rights. Anti racism. LGBTQ. Name it.

That's just the moral part. Even from a Machiavellian perspective, support for this cause makes no sense. The Jihadists who want to use Jerusalem as their base for the global Caliphate not going to stop because you handed them a treat. No Western country gains any material benefit from supporting the Palestinian cause.

[Kemi Badenoch @KemiBadenoch]

You can tell a lot from what a politician is ashamed of – and what he’s not.

It should have been deeply unsettling for Keir Starmer that Hamas described the Labour government’s plan to recognise a state of Palestine as “one of the fruits of October 7”, but he barely flinched.

The prime minister’s grandstanding on Palestinian statehood is more than a distraction from his inability to deliver for the British people. This affair exposes a deeper rot at the heart of government – a political inclination to surrender without shame.

Days after Labour’s intervention, Hamas released chilling videos of emaciated hostage Evyatar David, forced to dig his own grave. It was a harsh reminder of the evil and psychological cruelty of Hamas. This is an organisation which holds an innocent 24-year-old man in dark tunnels for 680 days, simply because he is Jewish.

While Israel cooperates closely with the UK on counter-terrorism intelligence so that we can be safe from terrorism within our own borders, Starmer rewards the terrorists that hold Israel’s civilians hostage, creating a perverse incentive for Hamas to keep torturing them.

None of it makes any sense because Labour’s goal is not to help build a lasting peace, to influence any real prospect of statehood, or to ease the terrible suffering of civilians in Gaza. Instead, their only goal is to appease anti-Israel sentiment in their party and the Islamist groups whose pressure they cannot resist. In the process, they betray Britain’s security interests, and they betray humanity.

We all want to see an end to the suffering in Gaza. I’m clear that this requires the eradication of Hamas.

The West must not be naïve about terrorism. Hamas is a terror group whose aims are openly genocidal. Hamas live-streamed gruesome videos slaughtering innocent civilians, and it has disrupted the flow of what should be free aid to Palestinians who need it. Yet it is winning the propaganda war in parts of the West.

In the face of social and political backlash, it takes courage to do the right thing. Shamefully, Starmer’s position on Palestinian statehood advances the victory of Hamas’s propaganda war.

Let us not forget that opportunities for a real two-state solution have been rejected many times before by the Palestinians, from the Peel Commission in the 1930s until the present day. The 1948 Partition Plan was a two-state solution, but it was followed by an invasion from several Arab armies with the express intent to wipe Israel off the map.

There can be no two-state solution with Hamas or with any organisation that rejects the existence of a Jewish presence in the Middle East.

Rather than acting in the interest of the British people, Starmer’s Labour prides itself on supposedly putting ‘international law’ at the heart of their foreign policy.

Yet, 40 eminent lawyers wrote to the Attorney General Lord Hermer setting out why Labour’s legally incoherent plan for recognition could breach international law which governs the establishment of new nations.

Revealingly, my successor in the Business and Trade Department, Jonathan Reynolds said those lawyers were “missing the point”. He said that “in the end, recognition of a state is a political judgment”. Finally, an honest answer from Labour.

When everyone wondered how it could possibly be the case that Britain was going to surrender sovereign territory in the Chagos Islands, government ministers told us it was because “we could face losing legal rulings.” As China and Iran welcome the Chagos surrender, and British taxpayers prepare to foot the £35 billion surrender tax, the government insists it has no choice but to follow legal advice.

And when Labour suspended arms export licences to Israel the Prime Minister insisted it was “a legal decision”.

They have been lying to us. As Reynolds’ answer makes clear, on Israel, on Chagos, Labour are making political judgments.