Ocedev

just a dev with big dreams

[Ocedev @OCE_devvv]

@akinkunmi @ehndrix 😂😂😭How did you guys even start beefing

[Ocedev @OCE_devvv]

@codekagefx 😂😂

[Ocedev @OCE_devvv]

@akinkunmi Nigerian Tech influencers

[Ocedev @OCE_devvv]

@buildanythingso Yeah

[Ocedev @OCE_devvv]

@onaonaqzd3 @ALICEP1INK You can say the same for Argentina. There is probably no way to tell because, no data. But, on this app. I have seen a lot of racist and Islamophobic tweets from Argentinians.

[Ocedev @OCE_devvv]

@himanshustwts To be fair, there was a problem with the dataset and the scope of the questions was AFCON QA. But this is still terrible.

[Ocedev @OCE_devvv]

@stanlee0nX It’s engagement farming, ignore

[Ocedev @OCE_devvv]

@beanstayboolin @sour_nd_sweetwt @Gnoc290438 @hannahwithfur Not reconcile*

[Ocedev @OCE_devvv]

@beanstayboolin @sour_nd_sweetwt @Gnoc290438 @hannahwithfur To reconcile and to talk about a topic, are two different situations. To reconcile, means both parties never agreed to the subject and it is still in debate, my guy. That is what the og poster meant, not that it was never talked about.

[Ocedev @OCE_devvv]

@beanstayboolin @sour_nd_sweetwt @Gnoc290438 @hannahwithfur For example I can say we never reconciled over the “Nature vs Nurture” debate but it doesn’t mean people have not discussed it long enough.

[Ocedev @OCE_devvv]

@beanstayboolin @sour_nd_sweetwt @Gnoc290438 @hannahwithfur You can see what I mean by it could either be a misrepresentation, or someone just adding their own piece, because if we go by that logic, the other guy also misinterpreted. Like I said it is possible it is not, or it is.

[Ocedev @OCE_devvv]

@beanstayboolin @sour_nd_sweetwt @Gnoc290438 @hannahwithfur Their*

[Ocedev @OCE_devvv]

@beanstayboolin @sour_nd_sweetwt @Gnoc290438 @hannahwithfur I don’t think you get the point. Let me use that guy as an example, when he said. “This has been talked about extensively” did the person he was responding say it wasn’t, No he was just adding his own opinion. It is only a contradiction if we assume the person is arguing there…

[Ocedev @OCE_devvv]

@beanstayboolin @sour_nd_sweetwt @Gnoc290438 @hannahwithfur Point, the same way the girl added her own. Your point of view is that arguing his points, therefore misunderstanding it. But what if she is just adding to the conversation, the same way he added his own. But it is still possible.

[Ocedev @OCE_devvv]

@beanstayboolin @sour_nd_sweetwt @Gnoc290438 @hannahwithfur It is possible she missed the point, “You’re just 21” sounded dismissive, and she wanted to make her own take on why it shouldn’t be ignored. That’s the way I see it, it is also possible she missed the point

[Ocedev @OCE_devvv]

@beanstayboolin @sour_nd_sweetwt @Gnoc290438 @hannahwithfur I don’t think you get, someone can add to the conversation without refuting someone’s point. The things, twitter frames everything as an argument. It is possible she just wanted to contribute her opinion, happens in conversations.

[Ocedev @OCE_devvv]

@beanstayboolin @sour_nd_sweetwt @Gnoc290438 @hannahwithfur ..argument

[Ocedev @OCE_devvv]

@beanstayboolin @sour_nd_sweetwt @Gnoc290438 @hannahwithfur It’s not the same. “Pancake” example is someone misrepresents or misunderstands your statement/argument. This one it is possible he knew what he meant and just wanted to add to the conversation, and not arguing the original point. The problem is twitter frames every thing as an.

[Ocedev @OCE_devvv]

@Adikastakes

[Ocedev @OCE_devvv]

@omgitsbirdman Injuries