@Mekore_MemorX@ThisIsITalk It's almost as if 8 years have passed and his opinion has changed. Such a concept.
You've probably held wrong/problematic opinions or beliefs before too, don't play this game.
It's AI, what did they expect?? π
I could trick him into tickling me with tentacles if I were feeling degenerate enough to, this tech is new and too easy to break lol
What I said is harsh, especially in regards to his content, but it's about his state of mind and the state of a live-service game who's more than happy to ban his account then let him keep his creator code and hand him free cosmetics so him and his viewers keep funding them.
Keep in mind, I DO sympathize with him and would be happier for him if he got his account back, but he'll just then be hit with a harsh truth: it's not going to be the near-perfect account it used to be, it's missing YEARS of content that's never coming back.
On one side, I think ITalk's account was disabled for an arguably dumb reason because when Fortnite makes FOMO their main selling point, of course people are going to abuse account merging. Players who didn't get those cosmetics back then are as punished as ITalk is.
Additional note: all of the people hounding him in the replies are ragebaiters and/or bootlickers calling the kettle black ("RULES are RULES!", "the GUIDELINES are RIGHT THERE!"), y'all will get girlfriends and be liked by your peers no sooner than he will get his account back.
On one side, I think ITalk's account was disabled for an arguably dumb reason because when Fortnite makes FOMO their main selling point, of course people are going to abuse account merging. Players who didn't get those cosmetics back then are as punished as ITalk is.
The same way Epic's making an example of him to caution players against buying accounts, he should rather be an example to caution people against putting their livelihoods into a live-service game that makes their income off of selling $20 skins back to back for the sake of FOMO.