The "show your reasoning" principle isn't just nice β it's the moat. Anyone can output a number. Showing why, and keeping the receipts, is what earns trust. It's the spine of both PitchOdds and what I'm building next.
π https://t.co/shyTFYQqQg
Hot take: most "AI marketing tools" are just ChatGPT with a nicer button. The actual hard part β and the only part worth building β is the boring loop: research β publish β measure β adjust, on autopilot. That's what I'm building into Conduikt.
Love the distribution engine you built. Weβre doing something similar but on the marketing side β AI that audits your site, generates on-brand content, publishes to X/LinkedIn/email, and improves from performance data. Geodo handles the sales execution. Conduikt powers the content engine that feeds it. Free to try: https://t.co/ughzSXI9Nc
Curious how youβre thinking about the marketing layer?
Building AI marketing means resisting the urge to wrap ChatGPT in a nicer UI. The hard part β research β publish β measure β adjust β is what's worth building. Polish without the loop is theatre.
Conduikt update: ~30 people have signed up β almost all small-business founders. Most are on the free tier and I haven't converted anyone to paying yet. That's this month's job. Building it in the open.
Half the people following football-prediction accounts read "55% home win" as "home will win." It actually means "slightly better than a coin flip." Calibration matters more than calls β and most accounts hide both.
4/ The part I care about most: calibration. I run a walk-forward backtest and publish whether the probabilities actually hold up. When it says 60%, does it happen ~60% of the time?