Old Chameli

I have a unique sence of humour. Respect everyone, even those who hate me. Above all, I'm always curious and love to learn new things.

[Old Chameli @OldChameli]

@TheKhelIndia ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

[Old Chameli @OldChameli]

@PaushaliSahu Remembered: hear how the 1st and 2nd phrase 'pehla pehla pyaar hai' and the 1st and 3rd time 'pehli pehli baar hai' especially the way thr 2nd 'pehli' is rendered. I have no idea of singing terms like 'tokna' but would be happy if you describe it briefly. TIA!

[Old Chameli @OldChameli]

@PaushaliSahu I agree! Both Md. Rafi & S. P. Balasubhramaniam have used this technique five times or more in a song. I don't remember the ones by Balu, but check this from Rafi: "yeh zulf agar khul ke bikhar jaaye to accha".

[Old Chameli @OldChameli]

@RahulSeeker Let BJP survive 2027, eh?

[Sandeep Manudhane @sandeep_PT]

If judges are not delivering justice, add it to their debits and sack them.
- The Citizens of India

[Old Chameli @OldChameli]

@satyanewshi Who types the data? The clerk hired by the election commission. Take them to task instead of harassing the common people. It is the same with the passport issuing authorities.

[Old Chameli @OldChameli]

@CJP_for_India Yes!

[Saket Gokhale @SaketGokhale]

CEC Gyanesh Kumar CAUGHT LYING AGAIN.

In July 2026, the ECI added a new “declaration” to Form 6 (used for adding new voters). In this declaration, voters were asked about details of their parents/grandparents in the last SIR.

Under law, Form 6 can be changed only through an amendment. This is because Form 6 forms a part of Registration of Electors Rules, 1960 which can ONLY be amended by Parliament.

👉 I asked the Govt of India whether the ECI had written to them for changing Form 6. Answer - NO.

👉 Further, Gyanesh Kumar now claims that SC “upheld the ECI’s power to change Form 6”. That is FALSE. Because the SC judgment came in May 2026. And Form 6 was changed two months later in July 2026.

How can the SC “uphold” an action by ECI that has not even been taken yet?

Gyanesh Kumar is a criminal who is responsible for destroying the democratic foundation of India. Even his fellow Election Commissioners have spoken up against his actions which are directed by Amit Shah personally.

Gyanesh Kumar must be thrown in jail for his crimes.

[Darab Farooqui @darab_farooqui]

We are not fighting BJP anymore, we are fighting the Supreme Court.

In reality, we can fight the BJP very easily. Supreme Court, I am not sure.

[Old Chameli @OldChameli]

@_amitbehere Zero testosterone

[Congress Seva Dal Legal Cell @SevadalLegal]

A Cyber Complaint has been filed against the concerned post by Flt. Lt. Anoop Verma (Retd.), and the matter will be actively pursued through appropriate legal channels.
Congress Seva Dal Legal Cell will not tolerate any malicious or unlawful acts targeting the Congress Party and its leaders or members.

We are committed to challenging every unlawful act that seeks to malign constitutional offices, defame Congress leaders, or equate democratic dissent with terrorism, as alleged in the present case.

Freedom of speech under Article 19 of the Constitution carries constitutional responsibilities and is subject to lawful restrictions. We will pursue appropriate legal remedies under the Constitution, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), and applicable cyber laws. No one is above the law, and accountability must be ensured through due process.

Congress Seva Dal Legal Cell
Justice Through Service

[Bar and Bench @barandbench]

#BREAKING Curative petition filed in the #SupremeCourt seeks recall of the September 23 split verdict on the Election Commissioners appointment law

Ground: Justice Satish Chandra Sharma should not have heard the case as his son is standing counsel for the Election Commission @ECISVEEP

[Old Chameli @OldChameli]

@mynameswatik 💯💯

[Ritika Chopra @RitikaChopra__]

So why does today's story matter?

Software (ECINET) meant to help EROs do their job is stopping them from using their judgement.

In Goa, 97 voters were deleted even though their EROs wanted them back.

In Maharashtra, EROs now disposing of "logical discrepancy" notices are held back by ECINet's restrictive options from using the discretion the law gives them.

The law gives the ERO a judgement to make. The software doesn't give the ERO the button to make it.

You can read @vallabhozarkarr's story here:
(10/11)
https://t.co/km1YShykx0

[Old Chameli @OldChameli]

@LavanyaBallal Three phrases popular nowdays... Dismissed, 'stighit hui' & "no, no, sit down'.

[Darab Farooqui @darab_farooqui]

Of course the Supreme Court will listen.

But if you expect justice, that's not the job of the Supreme Court of India.

[Old Chameli @OldChameli]

@PaushaliSahu Please be honest! Did you hear your video just now before liking my post? 😆😉 Please be honest, as I don't want a black crow to bite you. Jhoot bole kahwa kate!

[Old Chameli @OldChameli]

@PaushaliSahu The way you sung 'tokna' two different ways, shows your talent. ❤️

[Old Chameli @OldChameli]

@NaziaFarheen84 Marked ✍️

[Sandeep VS State @imra_mra]

That’s quite a POWERFUL suggestion. I have one for the judiciary too.

I appeal to doctors across India:- if a judge comes to your clinic for treatment, give them the next appointment one year later and tell them to leave with their NEXT DATE.

And I urge people from every profession to join this campaign in their own way. Give judges the next date and turn them away. Let them experience the same medicine they prescribe to others.