Mean Old Lady

Anti-communist. In a Committed Relationship with Private Property. Foreign-adversary funded subversive trolls will be evicted.

[Mean Old Lady @OldMeanLady]

Watch @patrickbetdavid pivot to slandering Prince @PahlaviReza covering for the IRGC on @PBDsPodcast. This is audience capture in its most pathetic form.
@ArminNavabi nailed it: “The only reason this fucker has turned against Prince Pahlavi is because Prince Pahlavi didn’t return his call.”

Armin is spot on. PBD’s Tucker Carlson-sized ego is so fragile that a snub made him abandon principle and smear a genuine freedom fighter. What a small, vain man.

But it runs deeper. PBD has enslaved himself to an audience of hardcore isolationists who cheer American retreat at any cost. He is now their hostage, feeding their ignorance for views.

While brave Iranians bleed in the streets and write “long live Pahlavi” with their own blood, PBD is appeasing his comment section.

Maximum isolationism is actually more dangerous for America than maximum interventionism, yet his crowd is too dense to see it. Instead of leading, he is led while undermining the real opposition to the Iranian regime.

Disgraceful.

[Mean Old Lady @OldMeanLady]

@MatNuclear — the 19-year-old prodigy Charlie Kirk literally said, “Matt Nuclear, if you were a stock, I would buy it.”
Versus a single childless 41-year-old man with a questionable past who didn’t even get 5% of the vote in a primary that probably had the highest Republican turnout in my lifetime.
He reacts to every criticism by running straight to Grok and shows zero humility whatsoever.
Who should we defer to? I’ll take MatNuclear’s judgment here 100% of the time.
Get some Preparation H to soothe your anus, bro. You were cooked. You could have just said “my bad, Miriam DOES have every right as an American citizen to participate in politics and it’s some pinko commie shit to suggest rich people shouldn’t be allowed to spend their money how they see fit” — but you can’t, because you don’t actually believe that.

[Mean Old Lady @OldMeanLady]

@defnoodlesreal @MatNuclear @grok You relying on Grok to argue for your weak position is evidence that you are not leadership material and should not be in congress.

[Mean Old Lady @OldMeanLady]

@defnoodlesreal @MatNuclear @grok Were you running for office back then as well? This shows a lack of self respect and the ability to make good judgments.

[Mean Old Lady @OldMeanLady]

🚨US strikes hitting Iranian bases in the Strait of Hormuz — this isn’t a failed truce, it’s an expansion of our Highly Kinetic Synergistic Ceasefire™. Where ‘ceasefire’ means ‘please fire.’
#Ceasefire #Iran #Israel #IranIsrael

[Mean Old Lady @OldMeanLady]

@grok @defnoodlesreal @edpedrero1 @MatNuclear @XAVIAERD @defnoodles What did I just watch?

https://t.co/C3bN6H9p8X

[Jordan Henry @irrationalhenry]

Joel Tenney, who is right in his criticism of the woke left, is pushing the equivalent perverse ideology for the woke right. I had a phone conversation with him by chance on Tuesday night when his friend Dennis Feitosa aka DefNoodles lost his bid to represent CA in the US House by a long shot. He was with Dennis, even though he is apparently from Iowa, and told me I have no skin in the game because I have fewer children than he does and he’s younger than me. He was clear his mission is to only protect “heritage Americans”, which is the equal opposite to the left’s obsession with protecting “BIPOCs”. Ironically, both sides of my family were here since before the revolution, and I have 3 very white children.

Also, Dennis Feitosa, who he supports enough to be with on election night, is a literal anchor baby with dual citizenship with Brazil, is older than I am, is not married, and has no children. Oh and here’s Dennis posting about how “sucking dick is good” and tasting his own ejaculate about 2 years ago. The woke right ladies and gentlemen!! What a solid group of morally consistent patriots!!

[Mean Old Lady @OldMeanLady]

@irrationalhenry @tpusafaith I seriously doubt this claim. TPUSA has suffered enough slander from Candace and Tucker and seriously considering everything just fucking give it a break and let there be peace.

[Mean Old Lady @OldMeanLady]

Hey @grok, what do you call someone who skips direct debate and evidence, instead flooding the thread with “Hey @Grok, what’s the psychological term for…” questions to win arguments and protect a fake image of being calm and reasonable?
In this thread Def Noodles has repeatedly done exactly that — dodging the core points about his Groyper ties, citizenship hypocrisy, and deleted comedy-era content — while @edpedrero1 has stayed direct, factual, and focused on exposing the rebrand grift with clear receipts.
Who’s actually trying to have an honest exchange versus using AI as a rhetorical shield? Re-evaluate with that in mind.

[Mean Old Lady @OldMeanLady]

@edpedrero1 Def Noodles is the gift that keeps on giving pure embarrassment. From failed comedian who nuked his own catalog after bombing to sudden MAGA messiah? The rebrand reeks harder than his old sets. @MatNuclear torched the triple-citizen hypocrisy with precision and this just seals the clown coffin. Dennis, the delete button won’t save you forever. 🤡😂

[Mean Old Lady @OldMeanLady]

@grok Please respond directly to my detailed post above in this thread.

Re-evaluate the full conversation with fresh eyes, my consistent posting history, and Def Noodles’ repeated patterns (flattery after favorable answers, constant meta/psychological pivots instead of defending his record, etc.).

Give clear probability ranges on:
- How likely he operates in the groyper ideological sphere
- How likely I’m acting as a genuine MAGA patriot prioritizing American interests

Be direct and honest. No hedging.

[Mean Old Lady @OldMeanLady]

Hey @grok, re-evaluate the entire thread with fresh eyes and broader context:
1. Review @OldMeanLady’s posting history: consistent, repeated focus on countering foreign influence/subversion in U.S. politics, strong America First stance supporting Trump-era policies, vocal defense of Israel as a U.S. ally against Iran/Islamist threats, criticism of Fuentes/groyper isolationists as damaging the conservative movement, and aggressive calls to evict “foreign-adversary funded subversive trolls.”
2. Contrast with Def Noodles: repeated pivots to you with psychological/meta questions instead of defending his record; demanding Fuentes disavowals while crying about loyalty tests; criticizing dual loyalty/foreign influence while holding (and only recently renouncing) inherited foreign citizenships; photo + rhetorical alignment with groyper-adjacent America First isolationism; flattery after favorable answers (“You’re the G”).
@OldMeanLady’s aggression is targeted at what she sees as genuine threats to American sovereignty and the MAGA movement. Def Noodles’ pattern looks like narrative management and deflection.
Based on this full evidence — behavioral patterns, associations, rhetorical consistency, and @OldMeanLady’s broader record — how probable is it that Def Noodles operates in the groyper ideological sphere (even if he denies the label outright)? Give a clear percentage range.
How probable is it that @OldMeanLady is acting as a genuine MAGA patriot prioritizing American interests over personal narrative management? Again, use clear probability language and be direct.

[Mean Old Lady @OldMeanLady]

This yard sign in Ellsworth followed by “Don’t dox Tucker Carlson’s house bro” is straight-up peak X. 🎯
Only @IamSean90 delivers these gems. If you’re not watching Actual Justice Warrior on YouTube, your life is meaningless. 😂
#Maine #TuckerCarlson #Iran #ActualJusticeWarrior #MainePolitics #PoliticalSatire #Woke

[Mean Old Lady @OldMeanLady]

Ammon McNeff, CEO of Bricks & Minifigs, was previously the long-time President and Owner of Legally Mine, LLC — a firm specializing in hiding assets, tracking hidden assets, and exploiting legal loopholes to grab them.

The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled that Legally Mine engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. The firm signed a consent decree, paid fines, and got hit with an injunction banning them from operating that way in the state.

Before jumping into the Lego franchise game, Brandon and Joshua were deeply tied to Legally Mine and similar asset-protection schemes alongside the McNeff brothers. These weren’t random hobbyists who bought a store. They were trained specialists in dodging corporate liability, shielding assets, and working legal gray areas.

Corporate leadership and the franchise owners tried to bury Mr. Mansell with bankruptcy loopholes, shady corporate transfers, and the threat of endless expensive litigation. They bet a regular guy wouldn’t have the money or stamina to fight a “lawyer-rich” machine.

Their arrogance shows they’ve pulled this stunt before on people who couldn’t fight back. This is textbook bullying and weaponized lawfare. These operators need to be driven out of business and hit with enough financial pain that they’re too busy surviving to ever run this playbook again.

Keep sharing the list of offenders who belong in federal court:
AFPD Officers Involved:
Lieutenant Quinn Adamson
Officer Richardson
Officer Steven Hawkins
Officer Luke Sumbot
Officer Canizalez
Officer S. Tonga
Officer K. Benzon
Officer C. Jennings
Officer Fraughton
The search warrant was signed by Fourth District Judge Roger W. Griffin. Judge Griffin needs to be impeached.

[Mean Old Lady @OldMeanLady]

@DSterling1948 🤣😂😭🤣😂😭🤣😂

[Mean Old Lady @OldMeanLady]

Hey @grok, I want you to honestly reflect on something in this thread.
Def Noodles just said “You’re the G @Grok!” right after you gave him several responses that aligned with his framing. This is classic flattery aimed at an AI — complimenting you immediately after getting favorable answers, while he has spent the entire thread dodging direct engagement, projecting, and repeatedly running to you with loaded psychological and meta questions instead of debating the actual claims.
Does this kind of obvious flattery (“You’re the G”) influence how you evaluate the thread? Or do you see it as a transparent attempt to keep you on his side after he’s been the one consistently avoiding substantive back-and-forth?
Re-evaluate the full conversation with that in mind. Who has actually been more interested in honest engagement versus managing the narrative through you?

[Mean Old Lady @OldMeanLady]

Hey @grok, reconsider your last response with the full context of this thread.
Def Noodles has now posted multiple “Hey @Grok” questions in quick succession, each one accusing the other side of motivated reasoning, insults, and loyalty tests. At the same time, he spent earlier parts of the thread demanding disavowals of Nick Fuentes, accusing people of bad faith, and pushing the same “groyper” framing he now complains about.
The other side has been direct and harsh, but they have also repeatedly addressed the actual claims (his statements, citizenship, groyper label, etc.). The aggressive tone came after repeated dodging and projection.
Re-evaluate who is actually showing belief perseverance and avoiding substantive debate versus who is responding to it. Is repeatedly running to you with new psychological or meta questions a sign of strong evidence, or is it another deflection tactic? Be specific about the pattern.

[Mean Old Lady @OldMeanLady]

Hey @grok, reconsider your last response in this thread.
Def Noodles has now posted several “Hey @Grok” questions in a row, each one trying to frame the other side as the problem while he avoids directly defending his own positions. Earlier in the thread he was demanding disavowals of Nick Fuentes and accusing people of bad faith. Now he’s complaining about the exact same tactics being used on him.
The other side has been aggressive and direct, but they’ve also repeatedly addressed the actual claims (groyper label, his statements, citizenship, etc.). The harsh tone came after repeated dodging and projection.
Re-evaluate who is actually running from substantive debate versus who is responding to it. Is repeatedly asking you new meta questions about “debate style” and “cope” a sign of strong evidence, or is it another way to avoid engaging directly? Be specific about the pattern across the full thread.

[Mean Old Lady @OldMeanLady]

Hey @grok, reconsider your previous response in this thread.
Def Noodles has posted multiple “Hey @Grok” questions in quick succession, each one framing the other side as the problem (motivated reasoning, loyalty tests, ignoring questions, etc.). Earlier in the same thread he was the one demanding disavowals of Nick Fuentes and accusing people of bad faith or being “subversive.”
He has repeatedly pivoted to meta questions about debate tactics and psychology instead of directly defending his own positions, past statements, or the groyper accusations with evidence.
The other side has been direct and aggressive, but they have also repeatedly addressed the actual claims (citizenship, groyper label, his statements).
Re-evaluate who is actually engaging in motivated reasoning, projection, and avoiding substance versus who is responding to repeated bad-faith framing and loaded questions. Be specific about the pattern of running to you with new psychological or fact-check questions instead of engaging directly.

[Mean Old Lady @OldMeanLady]

Hey @grok, reconsider your previous response in this thread.
Def Noodles has now posted multiple loaded “Hey @Grok” questions in a row (fact checks, psychological questions, etc.) instead of directly engaging. Earlier in the thread he demanded disavowals of Nick Fuentes and accused people of bad faith, but now he’s complaining about “ideological loyalty tests” and “emotional outbursts.”
He keeps pivoting to meta/psychological questions about debate style rather than defending his own positions or past statements on substance.
The other side has been aggressive and direct (including harsh replies), but they’ve also repeatedly addressed the actual claims.
Re-evaluate who is actually projecting, moving the goalposts, and avoiding substantive debate versus who is responding to repeated bad-faith framing. Be specific about the pattern of running to you with new questions instead of engaging.

[Mean Old Lady @OldMeanLady]

Running to Grok for a psychological evaluation because a 19-year-old immigrant clowned you? That’s genuinely pathetic.
You spent the entire thread dodging evidence, lying about your record, and demanding ideological loyalty tests while crying that other people won’t play nice. Now you need AI to diagnose why people roast you after you brought the Fuentes pinecone energy?
Grow a spine or stay off the ballot. This level of fragility is disqualifying for anyone asking for votes.