Spouse and parent. Podcaster and political advocate. Centrist Democrat who tries to see both sides (until one side starts working with Satan). Pagan, Bi, Poly.
BREAKING: moron who thinks he's smart repeats a Washington bill that doesn't exist and stupid people repeat it!
This is what you get when you look for this bogus bill on WaLeg:
BREAKING: The People's Republic of Washington has now officially banned "aimless driving" punishable by a $1000 fine.
No more "joyriding" or "clearing your head" or "cruising around." You must have a "lawful destination" to be on the roads in Washington. Communism at its finest on display.
Next up: A ban on "aimless walking, hiking or breathing."
I hope that a single member of the military reads this and takes it to heart:
The war against Iran is ILLEGAL! If YOU follow orders to attack Iran, you're following ILLEGAL orders that you KNOW violate the Constitution!
You WILL be convicted of TREASON!
Find courage! Say NO!
Hey, @Seahawks, @PNBallet has shown you how to throw the ball and challenges the Boston Ballet to show their stuff! Guess they couldn't do it!
https://t.co/7OqdzvbRAT
@Kennethsuperchi@washingtonpost ...But your reply implied "the nation's grid" as though it was one thing all the nation would have problems with. I was pointing out THAT claim was incorrect. 3/2
Yes, I ran in too far. ;)
@Kennethsuperchi@washingtonpost ...my response, looking back I realized my first sentence implied something other than what the rest of my post did not and may have been confusing. I don't debate that we have a major problem with the grid in many arts of the country. This article points to many reasons...2/2
@Kennethsuperchi@washingtonpost Standard response from someone with no proof. You make the claim, you provide the proof.
Clearly, you know NOTHING about science or debate.
@Kennethsuperchi@washingtonpost Standard answer to someone who can't back up their claim. If you asked me for proof of my statements I'd readily provide it. As you said, we don't know each other so why should I trust a thing you say?
You run along and claim things with no proof to other people.
@OrdnancePackard@festus67929@naugykevin@DevlinBarrett 1999 was when the "special prosecutor" rules were made official for the DOJ, based on a previous temporary law that had expired after being renewed two times. The rule allows the DOJ to appoint a special counsel to investigate and prosecute a case.
https://t.co/d72ahpyC2x.
@OrdnancePackard@festus67929@naugykevin@DevlinBarrett That case included the appointment of a special prosecutor by the DOJ. Nixon later fired that prosecutor. After huge protest, Nixon appointed another prosecutor.
The Senate had NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.
https://t.co/QmeyVhagrE
@Kennethsuperchi@washingtonpost You're incorrect about the fragility. Our nation's energy grids have been changing in many places, like Washington State, for new energy sources. But places like Texas REFUSE to do so because petroleum is so much their life that they'll let residents die rather than change.
@Kennethsuperchi@washingtonpost ...have been around since the early 2020's. You can't create new, non-petroleum ways of doing things unless people push for it. Which is what people are doing. 2/2
@Kennethsuperchi@washingtonpost Wind farms do not use petroleum to create the electricity. But they do use minor amounts of oil for lubrication. However, new biodegradable products from biomass (compostable products) are being proposed for use. EV boats are already coming into the market, EV helicopters...1/2
@Kennethsuperchi@washingtonpost Also, SUSPENDED is not the same as ELIMINATED. Most of the cities you mentioned have suspended their curbside recycling due to costs with the previous vendor, and are in talks with new vendors. Scottsdale's vendor STOPPED working with them because of contamination from the city.
@Kennethsuperchi@washingtonpost I don't use AI as a proof of facts since it so frequently proves to actually be wrong. Show me facts that these AZ cities have reduced or eliminated recycling programs. You can use the links that AI claims to be using for its facts.
@KMiksovsky@Kennethsuperchi@washingtonpost Discovering more oil is NOT the definition of renewable. Please provide proof that oil is renewable.
Also, please provide proof that we "discover more oil every year" and that this means we will never run out (I assume you mean YOUR generation when you say "we").