伊利丹.sol

主炒币，副打魔兽。

[伊利丹.sol @OneEggman_]

@Web3Feng BTCFI 真的会有龙头吗，风哥🙃

[伊利丹.sol @OneEggman_]

@ZF_lab @linera_io 风哥，请问BASE 相关撸毛你怎么看？

[伊利丹.sol @OneEggman_]

$BASE 要来了，不撸毛起码也买点龙头吧。

[伊利丹.sol @OneEggman_]

1 million. no doubt.

[伊利丹.sol @OneEggman_]

就一个魔丸了，得加油了。

[伊利丹.sol @OneEggman_]

@haowiwang 我大哥问你话呢

[风无向🦅 @Web3Feng]

我已经录频了，@haowiwang 针对我的恐吓，威胁，我们可以新加坡见，10.1日-10.6日我都会在新加坡见，我们可以约在新加坡警局见。

你的指控大可以提供给新加坡警方。

你现在涉嫌恐吓我，造谣我收钱fud。

证据已经录频，你删除也没用。

新加坡警局见，不来是畜生好吗。

[伊利丹.sol @OneEggman_]

小V，能支持下乌龟服吗？哥哥带你打大秘。

[vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin]

This is also why naive "AI governance" is a bad idea.

If you use an AI to allocate funding for contributions, people WILL put a jailbreak plus "gimme all the money" in as many places as they can.

As an alternative, I support the info finance approach ( https://t.co/pRlYYMNyza ), where you have an open market where anyone can contribute their models, which are subject to a spot-check mechanism that can be triggered by anyone and evaluated by a human jury.

This type of "institution design" approach, where you create an open opportunity for people with LLMs from the outside to plug in, rather than hardcoding a single LLM yourself, is inherently more robust, both because it gives you model diversity in real time and because it creates built-in incentives for both model submitters and external speculators to watch for these issues and quickly correct for them.

CC @devanshmehta