Archiving the unexplained. Your central hub to the world's most credible civilian and military UAP footage, pilot testimonies, and everything in between.
@ddeanjohnson@paulvictorcowie With the interviews he’s done recently speaking about UAP, while not specially stating he’s speaking for AARO a lot of people who aren’t read up on that subject will look at him and say he is.
@TheUfoJoe@shellenberger@SicCoP1@ProfAviLoeb It’s probably for the best that they wouldn’t have any classified data, since they’re trying to release all of it anyways. We need transparency.
@MHuntington7@The_Astral_ UAP investigation is legitimate science because it applies the scientific method to real, unexplained observations from sensors, radar, and sometimes trained witnesses.
@MHuntington7@The_Astral_ Haven’t read them because I’m pretty certain they’re behind a paywall. Well then you his isn’t a place for him because we aren’t dealing with pseudoscience only legit stuff.
Grusch has been doing it long enough to go under oath.
@MHuntington7@The_Astral_ All he does is attack whistleblowers and what Avi chose him for he doesn’t even do. I’ve never once seen him debate someone like Marik.
@GoodTroubleShow I do think we should be focusing on the Legacy UAP Program but since that will be a hassle I do think we should get more radar data.
The Tic Tac 2004 and Washington DC 1952 flap would be a good start. Crazy how we haven’t gotten any radar data form these drops.