You reckon Ft. Hoochaka ain’t got nothin to do with the Charlie case?
Mitch is the one that introduced Ft. huachuca to the investigation and it’s very relevant. Jesse doesn’t seem to have a talent for reading the situation so I’m not surprised he had that take about Mitch’s story. But I couldn’t disagree more, Mitch seemed to be treading lightly and they were dancing with what to share and when to share. She reminded him of an ex. If you were sharing a story involving someone who caught your attention because her eyes were strikingly similar to your ex, would it cross your mind that your wife is watching, and it’s obvious that you are at least subconsciously attracted to those eyes.
You admit he was on the base, do you think there’s any merit to why he was on the base? Do you doubt that tunnel existed?
Do you believe Erika was simply a doting trad wife who maintains an affinity for sequins and pyrotechnics in all circumstances?
You are a likable person but you’re either not very bright or not genuinely interested in the truth and that makes me uninterested in you.
Folks with noticeably large heads make me curious who pretended to be Vice Admiral Robert Harward in that mask on fox.
Normal size head + mask = big head. Some people just have naturally big heads. And Larry is just Larry. But big heads, bald men, or people with too much face work could assuage some doubt by doing a little neck pinch and pull.
@AnaEscobarShow With all that suggested altruism in helping with the AES investigation, it’s odd that they are passionately against anyone investigating the of Charlie’s case
Bearing an uncanny resemblance to the first lady of france, an ET doll with a blonde wig and a scarf is now a symbol of courage and a priceless artifact.
The first lady who is a man playing the role of a woman named Brigette. As he approached 40 years of life, a man in character as a woman, taught theater to children and began a relationship with a 14 year old boy. The man would later marry the boy, Emanuel, and eventually slap him in the face as he exited the plane to play pretend as the president of France.
@RealCandaceO I appreciate the way you speak. Please give Brigette Doll a respectful nod on my behalf. @OwenBenjamin thank you for the way you do words.
I think of a patsy as someone who has been manipulated or leveraged to be the fall guy in a crime. But your question made me want to check the definition.
Patsy: “a person who is easily manipulated or victimized”
The person picked to embody a lie which was designed to protect a criminal organization.
@fionanunya The original version is bad enough without the AI edit.
While you watch the unedited version, pay attention to his speech pattern. Then check out the next clip from a 60 minutes interview with a mystery man.
https://t.co/EX43ZsutGy
⚡️🇺🇸 BREAKING
ADL leader Jonathan Greenblatt says Americans who criticize Jews and Israel will be monitored by the FBI.
“We will monitor social media and check your bank accounts.”
@HumblyseekingJ@realstewpeters This was also the where Dan Flood found some humor in doing the exact same left hand to right bicep signal as Charlie explains a metaphor involving call signs.
It seems like he wanted to share the signal joke with someone out of frame to his right. I’m curious who that was.
@RepThomasMassie Massie, thank you for your service. You are one of the few representatives who actually represents the American people. Your patriot behavior is beautifully incongruous in that house of feckless cowards.
@messi16535@MuppetMasher@I_Am_JohnCullen@WeAreNotGTM There is some evidence that I might be retarded. As I typed “not blind” I nailed my imitation of Future saying “got the vision.”
I couldn’t recall the song so I did some audio research.
Life is Good music video at 3:20. It’s not in the song, just the music video.
Not blind, not retarded, not a genius either. Just an endlessly curious person with a moderate understanding of logic.
I would speculate that there were indeed drones present during the event. I just haven’t seen compelling evidence to support that. My guess is that the drones had no direct role in physically harming him.
A comment from a university spokeswoman saying there were no drones is also not evidence of anything.
We both speculate that a drone was present. If that is proven to be true, that still does not prove it was used to cause his death.
At least we agree it wasn’t a 30.06.
No thank you. Repeatedly calling me son is a fascinating move.
Do you have a dog in the race? I don’t. I’m interested in the truth. I think you’ve done plenty of good work on other subjects. I just don’t agree with your interpretation of the Charlie case. It’s your arrogance and petulant attitude towards anyone who disagrees that makes me not trust you.
What is shown in the picture you posted here?
I’m not your son. I’m also not Joe Kent. I don’t know why he reached out to you.
I think the flight track is objective evidence that the plane was present where it showed. In my opinion, the flight track supports some level of involvement. I also wouldn’t be surprised if a UAV was deployed. But there is no objective evidence that a UAV took him out.
That’s reasonable to not trust me, we don’t know each other.
@I_Am_JohnCullen@RealTheForce@IanCarrollShow The great curmudgeon returns. You have not presented anything compelling about the UAVs. I’d bet there were some present but I haven’t seen proof. I have no reason to believe he was shot. Lapel mic boom and possible hand mic zap is more compelling than your elbit ad-reads.