Outside Politics

What Power Have You Got? Where Did You Get It From? In Whose Interests Do You Exercise It? To Whom Are You Accountable? How Can We Get Rid Of You?

[Outside Politics @OPolitics]

By the 21st Century, the sum of human knowledge had declined.

Many queued enthusiastically to take the liars' poisons, deriding those who resisted the madness.

Later on, for "the common good", the new rulers banned critical thinking and unofficial science.

[ETHICAL APPROACH UK @EthicalApproach]

There is a tendency to view Operation Talla, CJSSC, police disclosures, court administration, prosecution policy and digital justice reform as separate subjects.

They are not.

When examined individually, each appears administrative.

When examined cumulatively, a far more significant picture emerges.

Over the past several years, a substantial body of official material has entered the public domain revealing:

• national coordination structures;
• cross-agency criminal justice governance;
• integrated digital information systems;
• harmonised operational frameworks;
• shared strategic objectives; and
• increasingly centralised management of information flow.

At the same time, official disclosures have revealed examples of allegations being filtered, re-framed, classified as intelligence rather than crime, or not recorded at all.

In a justice architecture designed around interoperability and information flowing from a single point of entry, the initial classification decision becomes profoundly important.

If information enters the system in one form, the entire system inherits that classification.

If it does not enter the system at all, the consequences are obvious.

Operation Talla is no longer merely a matter of discovery.

CJSSC is no longer merely a matter of discovery.

Both have now entered the realm of persistent evidential architecture.

Time and inevitability walk side by side.

Further reading here:

CJSSC Hypothesis Paper:
https://t.co/nzTb2nRC8t

Transforming the Criminal Justice System - Forensic Analysis:
https://t.co/ER96gv2Shh

[Outside Politics @OPolitics]

@SkyNews @EthicalApproach Computer says no!

[Dr. Marcus De Brun @indepdubnrth]

What people do know is that I have been found GUILTY of undermining public health guidelines during the Pandemic.

What the public DO NOT KNOW is what those guidelines stated. So I will publish them here:

For the treatment of Covid patients in the Community/Nursing Homes settings, Doctors were advised as follows:

1. Do not take the patients blood pressure.

2. Do not listen to their chest (auscultation)

3. Do not prescribe any medication (paracetamol only)

4. Refer to end of life protocols (palliative care/midazolam).

What these guidelines effectively stated is this: Do not examine your patients. Do not touch your patients.
Do not prescribe treatments for your patients -and if they appear to be very unwell- sedate them and allow them to die.

I can only recall one period in human history when human beings were treated in this manner.

[ETHICAL APPROACH UK @EthicalApproach]

This is why Covid crimes perpetrated by the State were unstoppable 👇🏻

[ETHICAL APPROACH UK @EthicalApproach]

There is now a profoundly uncomfortable constitutional contradiction emerging in Britain.

Outside the courtroom, Operation Talla was:

• celebrated;
• nationally coordinated;
• strategically managed;
• operationally embedded;
• intelligence-linked;
• and treated internally as one of the most significant policing operations in modern British history.

Inside the courtroom however, something very different appears to happen.

Increasingly, when citizens attempt placing the operational reality of Talla onto the court record in meaningful evidential form, the operation suddenly appears:

• irrelevant;
• excessive context;
• procedurally inconvenient;
• or somehow disconnected from the issues requiring determination.

That contradiction is becoming impossible to ignore because if Operation Talla was lawful, proportionate and constitutionally legitimate, why would British courts appear institutionally reluctant to permit full scrutiny of it?

That question may already be one of the defining constitutional questions of modern Britain.

My latest paper examines a question directly:

“Why Do British Courts Appear Determined to Keep Operation Talla Off the Court Record?”

Available here: https://t.co/2BgkOvuqcb

[Sense Receptor @SenseReceptor]

NEW: Oncologist ANGUS DALGLEISH

"There are at least 12 mechanisms where mRNA can insert into DNA and activate oncogenes"

"there is no way you can control this technology"

"its use for future vaccines should be banned and the Covid ones stopped now"

@ChildrensHD

[ETHICAL APPROACH UK @EthicalApproach]

Most members of the public have never heard of the Criminal Justice System Strategic Command (CJSSC) and that fact alone should probably concern them.

Britain's criminal justice institutions routinely explain growing backlogs, delays and systemic failures by reference to overwhelming demand, insufficient resources and increasing complexity.

Perhaps that explanation is correct.

But perhaps a more fundamental question should first be asked - Why does a justice system require a Strategic Command at all?

• Police investigate.
• Prosecutors prosecute.
• Courts adjudicate.
• Juries determine facts.

So what exactly is being "commanded"?

And, by whom?

The existence of the CJSSC raises constitutional questions which deserve far greater public scrutiny than they currently receive.

• Is the system genuinely overwhelmed?
• Is it burdened by unnecessary procedure?
• Is it suffering from chronic mismanagement?
• Or is something more significant occurring beneath the surface?

My latest paper examines these questions and leaves the reader to draw their own conclusions.

Available here:
https://t.co/aPtlU4YCAP

[Chris Wick @ChrisWickNews]

His job is to engineer civil unrest, delivering a Digital ID mandate for his WEF handlers.

This isn’t about popularity — and it never was.

What’s unfolding feels increasingly calculated, not accidental.

A steady push of policy after policy, each one framed as efficiency, safety, or modernization — yet collectively pointing toward something far more rigid underneath.

Digital identity systems. Centralized verification frameworks. Expanding requirements to access basic services in an increasingly monitored environment.

Supporters call it progress. Critics see something else taking shape: a quiet tightening of control wrapped in the language of convenience.

And the most unsettling part isn’t just the direction — it’s how normal it’s being made to feel while it happens.

Because once these systems are fully embedded, walking them back becomes almost impossible.

At that point, it’s no longer about debate.

It’s about structure.

[UK Medical Freedom @ukmfa1]

PUBLIC "IN THE DARK" about new 2024 UK law mandating the addition of synthetic folic acid to all white flour, including organic. Mass medication of the public with uncontrolled dose of chemical that can cause serious side-effects.

@ClareCraigPath "...There's been no public discussion, no reporting in the newspapers...".

‼️WATCH full interview with @ukmfa1 here https://t.co/pFMGzTknmm ‼️

[ETHICAL APPROACH UK @EthicalApproach]

There was once a time when questioning the integrity of the British courts would have been regarded as unthinkable.

Today, increasing numbers of ordinary citizens are no longer merely questioning judicial outcomes. They are questioning the system itself.

Not because they reject the rule of law, but because many now observe:

• procedural obstruction replacing substantive scrutiny;
• institutional protectionism overriding transparency;
• oversight structures lacking meaningful consequence;
• evidential pathways narrowing before proper examination can occur;
• and a justice architecture which increasingly appears more concerned with managing the consequences of truth than exposing truth itself.

The greatest constitutional danger is not criticism of the courts. It is the possibility that the criticism may increasingly be justified.

My latest paper examines a question which would once have sounded absurd, but which many citizens now quietly ask themselves - Have British Courts Gone Rogue?

It's available here:
https://t.co/ZCJzBEmgP0

[Pete Sanford @PeteSanford]

ARLA WON -- YOU LOST - BOVAER SOON ALL MILK

After the Arla - DMK takeover last week a Huge New Milk Supply Monolith has been Formed.

This means Bovaer‑milk will quietly become the default “standard milk”, while organic milk becomes scarcer and more expensive.

AND YOU WILL NOT BE INFORMED ON LABELS

Why this matters now with the Arla–DMK merger:

This is where things get strategically interesting.

1. Arla is already the most aggressive adopter of Bovaer

They defended it publicly, continued trials, and positioned it as central to their climate strategy.

This means the merged entity is WILL scale Bovaer faster, not slower.

2. DMK brings Germany — a huge dairy market — into the equation

The merger forces a harmonised methane strategy, and Bovaer is the only ready‑to‑deploy tool.

CONSUMERS: Exoect Organic Milk to be Priced out of the Market, not just UK, not just EU, but there will be plans through those financially involved, like Bill Gates, to get BOVAER in Animal Feeds as the de facto position.

And before Mr Gates Operatives on X start to argue:

The Company holding Bovaer Trademarks is DSM-Firmenich -- The Gates Foundation holds extensive shareholdings in this Company.

From Scottish Parliamentary Briefing Papers re Nicola Sturgeon's involvement...

"There also seems to be some information hidden from public view, such as DSM-Firmenich denying any connection with Bill Gates, only for us to discover Bill Gates has purchased 1m shares in the Company, with the major investor behind the scheme, Black Rock"

There will also be price differentiation between Bovaer Milk and Non-Bovaer.

OF COURSE TEN YEARS FROM NOW THERE WILL BE ZERO CHOICE - JUST BOVAER.

For the Arla–DMK giant, this means:

They will push Bovaer harder than ever — because climate targets demand it.

They must avoid another consumer revolt — because the merged brand is too big to hide.

They will likely invest heavily in “green dairy” PR, transparency dashboards, and retailer‑aligned messaging.

Any future health concerns (even unfounded ones) will hit twice as hard because of their scale.

LACK OF CHOICE, LACK OF TRANSPARENCY, PUBLIC REJECTION

We’re sleepwalking into a food system where the public has no real choice at all.

Supermarkets are quietly shifting to “low‑methane milk” using feed additives like Bovaer — and most people don’t even know it’s happening.

There’s no clear labelling.
There’s no public documentation.

There’s no way for families to choose milk without these additives unless they pay organic prices or hunt down tiny local suppliers.

And here’s the truth nobody in the industry wants to say out loud:

Even if every analysis says “no harm”, even if regulators approve it, even if the science is solid…

The public still won’t want it if they feel tricked.

People want transparency.

People want choice.

People want to know what’s going into the food chain — not find out years later through a press release.

This isn’t anti‑science. This isn’t anti‑farmer.

This is about trust.

If the industry keeps rolling out feed additives without open discussion, clear labelling, or public consent, they’re going to trigger a backlash far bigger than they expect.

Choice matters. Transparency matters. Trust matters.

And right now, the public is getting none of them.

MANY FARMERS DO NOT WANT CHEMICALS OF ANY KIND PUT INTO ANIMAN FEED AND THEN INTO THE HUMAN FOOD CHAIN..

Because. It. Is. Insane...

[Kenny Carmody @KennyCarmody]

There are three types of people in the world.

The first group does what the authority tells them without questioning it. Often because they strangely believe that the authority knows best and is benevolent.

The second group doesn't actually want to do what the authority commands, but they're afraid of the consequences if they don't obey.

These two groups have been behind every tyranny in history—every single one—because without them, tyrants couldn't rule; they're simply not strong enough.

The third group is growing and says: 'I see what you're doing, but I'm not going along with it.' This group has ended every tyranny in history.

[Dr. Marcus De Brun @indepdubnrth]

We can't build a Children's Hospital, and the emergency department in Beaumont has been extended with a tent.... but 130 data centres? No problem!

[ETHICAL APPROACH UK @EthicalApproach]

One of the most damaging public perceptions now emerging in Britain is not merely that policing sometimes gets things wrong.

It is the growing perception that, when serious questions arise, police institutions increasingly appear to retreat from accountability itself.

Not through dramatic refusal but through:

• silence;
• procedural narrowing;
• fragmented responses;
• evidential opacity;
• jurisdictional deflection;
• delayed engagement;
• and carefully managed institutional language.

That perception is becoming constitutionally dangerous, because policing in Britain attempts to rely fundamentally upon public consent and consent cannot meaningfully survive where the public begin believing that accountability mechanisms exist primarily to protect institutions from scrutiny, rather than expose institutions to it.

The deeper issue is this - A police force does not lose legitimacy merely because allegations are made against it. It loses legitimacy when the public begin suspecting that the institution is structurally unwilling, or unable, to confront difficult truths transparently once allegations arise.

Once that perception becomes culturally embedded, restoring trust becomes exponentially more difficult and perhaps completely out of the question altogerher. This is not because criticism exists, but because confidence in police accountability itself collapses.

[ETHICAL APPROACH UK @EthicalApproach]

Jacqui (@JacquiDeevoy1) is one of the many journalists who totally understand what Operation Talla is about and how constitutionally grave its implications are for the State and in particular for Britain's police forces and policing institutions.

She is also one of the very few indeed, who have possessed and exercised the courage to report on it 🙏❤️

[ETHICAL APPROACH UK @EthicalApproach]

The CJSSC - A Body the Public Rarely Hears About

Most people in Britain have never heard of the Criminal Justice System Strategic Command (CJSSC).

During the most constitutionally significant periods in modern British history however, its coordination mechanisms sat quietly in the background between elements of...

• policing
• prosecution
• courts
• government
• and wider justice-system administration.

That alone should invite public curiosity, not because hidden conclusions should be assumed, but because serious constitutional societies are supposed to understand....who coordinates what, who attends which strategic forums, what influence exists and how institutional positions are shaped during periods of claimed crisis.

The more Operation Talla material emerges, the more one question increasingly arises:

How many “independent” institutional positions were truly independent at all?

Perhaps the CJSSC and related strategic justice coordination structures deserve considerably more public scrutiny than they have ever received to date.

[Outside Politics @OPolitics]

@nightsong53 👍

[Outside Politics @OPolitics]

@nightsong53 I’m affronted by the principle that anyone should consider that they have the right to pollute my food, whatever their motives.

[ETHICAL APPROACH UK @EthicalApproach]

CRN 6029679/21 raises an extremely serious question which many still appear reluctant to confront.

In 2015 (and still relevant today), the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act Code of Practice, which applies in England and Wales, stated:

“the investigator should pursue all reasonable lines of inquiry, whether these point towards or away from the suspect.”

It also imposed duties relating to the recording, retention and handling of relevant material obtained during a criminal investigation.

Now consider the publicly evidenced position surrounding CRN 6029679/21:

• crime reference issued
• evidence received
• witness material received
• expert material received
• investigative handling activity evidenced

but then:

• assertions that there had effectively been “no investigation”

Those positions sit in obvious tension, because once material is received within a criminal investigation context, statutory duties do not simply evaporate into thin air simply because a case is politically inconvenient, institutionally sensitive or operationally undesirable.

The public are finally beginning to understand the real constitutional issue - an issue institutions already knew and continue still to know.

[LynneN 🌸✝️ https://www.youtube.com/watch @nightsong53]

folic acid is water soluble+will in 2-3 days be flushed out of the body BUT as it is added in large amounts to foods we eat constantly the body does not have a chance to clear it. It masks the symptoms of vitamin B12 deficiency so damage to the nervous system continues unrecognis