@Septennats Maj vraiment sympa mais j'ai l'impression que la partie Giscard est devenue un mod "Hard" , le RPR ou les syndicats bloquent toute politique qui permettrait de survivre a l election suivante.
Le mode gauche est bien plus simple même en appliquant une politique de droite .
@Giuseppe_AP@ReedAtlanticist @DjDeadpig6 The reichsmark was gaining value at around 15% per year . At these levels , some jewish money would not be making the difference between stabilisation and hyperinflation . The public works initiated under Brüning-schleicher and continued by hitler would not have crashed the RM.
@Giuseppe_AP @DjDeadpig6 And also : "They cut the pay because they reversed hyperinflation. Would you rather get paid more & your money worth less?"
What where you meaning by this , if not my previous assumption ?
@Giuseppe_AP @DjDeadpig6 Deporting a fraction of less than 1% of the population would not have any effect on the work force nor the treasury . The unemployement was around 30% , its like saying that nationalising one rich guy is gonna finance the entire us debt .
@Giuseppe_AP @DjDeadpig6 Bludiblud , you litteraly said that hitler did not lower the salaries because he fought hyperinflation . In 1933 , hyperinflation was not a thing . It was not a thing since 1923 .
@Giuseppe_AP @DjDeadpig6 Btw , if you're thing is nazism , at least try to know the thing right. Confusing the 23 hyperinflation with the great depression shows a lack of clue on the topic .
@Giuseppe_AP @DjDeadpig6 So yeah , i am right . In this case , lowering salaries combined with q inflation of the currency is a double penalty. So you're precendent argument is thus false .
@Giuseppe_AP @DjDeadpig6 Between 1930 and 1932 , the reichsmark was in a phase of deflation, gaining value with each month due to the austerity policies of then chancelor Brüning . If anything , getting payed less of a currency wich was getting stabilised by inflation is a double penalty.