Ppl are misunderstanding the physical and technical midfielder. They are all physical or they wouldnt be able to at the top level
The recent trend has been to go for midfielders who primarily win duels over making forward passes
Doesnt matter when you play Rodri, hes too good
Using in-house data, FIFA’s Football Performance Insights team have noticed a trend at this summer's World Cup.
Compared to previous editions, they have spotted that possessions including an off-ball run which targets the inside channels and the space in behind the opposition defence are leading to successful actions more frequently.
In other words, attacking the gap between the widest defender and the centre-back nearest to them with a forward run is increasingly valuable.
Compared to the previous World Cup four years ago, possession sequences that include such a movement in the 2026 tournament are leading to around 2.7 shots on goal per 30 minutes of ball-in-play time — an increase of around 34 per cent.
Those runs are effective because they cause tension in the opponents’ defence. Most often, that full-back will have their eye on a winger, while the centre-back on that side will be tracking the striker.
@ThomHarris_
🔗 https://t.co/aINEq8zJc0
4% of their under 16 population play football consistently.
Americans underestimate the decision making aspect of playing football. Almost impossible to teach an untrained individual how to play as full back to an elite level.
From @TheAthletic: It’s time to admit the uncomfortable truth: The U.S. may never win a men’s World Cup. "This sport belongs to the world. We borrow it every few years," our columnist writes. "America is not built for the beautiful game." https://t.co/inGTxGSMrC
Pure talent and hard work not science in 2015? 😂
Your favourite coaches had every science based equipment going by then lol.
Ralph Mann had hundreds of data sets too.