#Entrevista 🤖 |"Quien se quede con el mercado de la IA va a ser el dueño del mundo. De eso no te quepa ninguna duda", asegura en entrevista con PanAm Post el consultor digital @DiegoASantos | Por ✍️ @oririvas91 https://t.co/gPwmYUuYcD
It’s been fascinating seeing the Sydney Sweeney campaign unfold.
The two narratives:
⁃ she setback women’s sports by inappropriately sexualizing it
⁃ she’s receiving backlash from feminists who are jealous of her male attention
Not a single person is talking about how she correctly identified the most profitable consumer market for her to go into, negotiated a partnership with significant equity, and executed one of the greatest campaigns of all time.
The results:
- 60m views across company accounts (Polymarket’s LeBron campaign did 16M).
⁃ Google search is up 1100% vs prior month.
⁃ Novig has crossed 1B in cumulative trading volume since their August launch.
Sydney Sweeney being an intelligent, high agency entrepreneur will always be hidden by the fact that she is a hot blonde. If respect is off the table then respect be damned.
🇨🇳🐟 | China presenta un pez robótico autónomo para la vigilancia submarina.
👉El BG-5, revelado en la expo CIFTIS en Pekín, se asemeja a un arowana dorado, nadando de forma autónoma hasta por 5 horas mientras evita obstáculos y utiliza un sonar integrado. El robot está diseñado para misiones de doble uso, incluyendo inspecciones de infraestructura, monitoreo de puertos y reconocimiento.
BREAKING: Palantir's Alex Karp just made the geopolitical case against pausing AI development, and it's hard to argue with.
"If we didn't have adversaries, I would be very in favor of pausing this technology completely, but we do."
This isn't a techno-optimist dismissing safety concerns.
This is a CEO saying the pause debate ignores the actual world we live in.
If you pause and your adversaries don't, you didn't make a principled stand.
You just surrendered the lead.
The AI safety debate just ran into geopolitics head-on.
Who has the stronger argument here?
Que golpe es esto... Quienes enseñamos lo notamos desde hace mucho, pero que el MIT también admita enfrentarse al mismo dilema es... preocupante. "La escuela de tecnología más famosa de la Tierra admitió que las máquinas rompieron su forma de enseñar".
MIT published a brutally honest report on what AI is doing to students.
A committee of professors and students spent five months studying how AI changed learning on campus, and the findings read like a warning to every university on the planet.
Study groups are disappearing. Office hours are emptying out. Problem sets and take-home exams no longer prove anything, because AI can produce credible solutions to almost any written assignment in the undergraduate curriculum. Students who lean on chatbots lose mastery and confidence, and some slip into what the report calls cognitive surrender, reaching for AI at the first hint of struggle.
The numbers are rough. 46 percent of surveyed MIT undergrads use LLMs daily. 90 percent worry about their own overreliance. Undergrads who feel AI makes them replaceable now outnumber those who feel it makes them capable.
The committee's answer surprised me. They refused to fight AI with surveillance. The report calls AI detectors unreliable, says lockdown browsers feel like spying, and warns that policing students builds a classroom atmosphere of mutual distrust.
Instead, MIT wants to rebuild education around the things AI can't replace. That means oral exams, semester portfolios, in-person project work, and a required social component in every subject. The report even floats the idea of rethinking grades entirely, since without a GPA to optimize, much of the incentive to cheat with AI evaporates.
The committee warns professors against replacing undergrad research assistants with AI agents just because they're cheaper, because a university exists to grow people, not output.
The most famous tech school on earth admitted the machines broke its way of teaching. Its answer is more humans, not more software.
𝗗𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗮 𝗣𝗼𝗽𝘂𝗹𝗮𝗿: 𝗰ó𝗺𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗶𝗿 𝗹𝗮 𝗱𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗮𝗱 𝗱𝗲𝗹 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗯𝗮𝗷𝗮𝗱𝗼𝗿 𝘀𝗶𝗻 𝗯𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘀 𝗱𝗲 𝗶𝘇𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗲𝗿𝗱𝗮
https://t.co/S8oM4nvOsI
"Un trabajador que no se define por el odio de clase, sino por su dignidad, su esfuerzo, su familia, su propiedad, su fe y su responsabilidad", bajo esta idea, el escritor y conferencista Raúl Tortolero publica su nuevo libro
Muchas gracias @OriRivas91 y al @PanAmPost_es.
Muchas bendiciones.
#ContrarrevoluciónCultural
#DerechaPopular
#NuevaDerecha
#11DeSept 🗽📢 | Manifestantes pro Palestina irrumpieron en los homenajes a las víctimas del atentado terrorista contra las Torres Gemelas y se enfrentaron con un bombero veterano, mientras las autoridades buscaban calmar los ánimos.
Una de las historias más conmovedoras del 911, es la historia de Roselle y su dueño Michael Hingson. Michael era invidente y trabajaba en el piso 78 de la torre Norte del World Trade Center.
Roselle estaba entrenada para ser sus ojos, y cuando el avión del vuelo 11 impactó la torre 16 pisos más arriba de donde ellos se encontraban, en medio del caos, empezó a guiar a Michael por las escaleras de emergencia..
Justin Gaethje spoke at the 2026 Republican Midterm Convention and urged people to turn out for the midterm elections:
"In fighting, your last fight is how people remember you, but your next fight is the only one that matters.
One mistake I've made in my career was becoming complacent while I was on a winning streak and forgetting how unforgiving my sport can be.
If we are not just as passionate about voting and winning in these midterms as we were in the last presidential election, then we risk getting knocked out and losing all the momentum we have been fighting for."