Oscar

[Alex Onyia @winexviv]

Breaking: OLANREWAJU FADEHAN, the current Head of Examinations at the WAEC office in Awka, Anambra State, has openly acknowledged and confessed the many issues surrounding the 2026 WAEC examinations, including some of the factors that led to mass failures among students who legitimately sat for the exams.

We will get to the root of this. Our students, who have worked hard for years, deserve justice, and we will ensure they get it.

It is a big shame that WAEC has allowed these failures to put the futures of our children at risk.

[Oscar @Oscarsuv]

@AbuZeenat_ Varane

[Oscar @Oscarsuv]

@UTDIMole Casemiro

[offside 💛💫 @_offside18]

Can you guess the legendary player?🥶

Hardest🤯

[Oscar @Oscarsuv]

@AbuZeenat_ Zizou

[Oscar @Oscarsuv]

@AbuZeenat_ Belligoallll 😝

[Abu Zeenat_ @AbuZeenat_]

Guess The Player ?

Level__100% Impossible

[Alex Onyia @winexviv]

I have now received further disturbing reports from multiple schools, teachers, parents and students about what happened during this 2026 WAEC examination.

In some examination centres, question papers were reportedly insufficient. I received reports of as many as FOUR students sharing ONE question paper.

Think about that.

Students prepared for years for an examination that could determine university admission, scholarships and, in many cases, the direction of their lives only to enter examination halls without enough question papers.

There are also serious reports concerning the security of examination materials, including allegations that some papers or answer materials circulated before the appropriate examination period. These allegations must be independently investigated, not internally explained away.

Even basic examination materials raise questions. Students have reported that calculators and other materials they expected WAEC to provide were unavailable in some centres.

We need an independent forensic investigation of the entire 2026 examination process from question-paper production and distribution to examination security, marking, CBE systems, grading, result processing and eventual release.

WAEC should preserve and make available for independent scrutiny the examination records and, subject to appropriate privacy safeguards, provide candidates access to their scripts including relevant paper-based scripts and CBE records.

If an independent investigation establishes that systemic failures were serious enough to compromise the integrity of the examination, then Nigeria must be prepared to consider every remedy necessary, including remarking, reprocessing results, rescheduling affected papers or, in the most extreme case, invalidating affected examinations.

No institution is bigger than the future of millions of Nigerian children.

Behind every WAEC result is a human being.

A child waiting for admission.

A scholarship that could disappear.

Parents who have sacrificed everything.

A family whose plans may depend on those grades.

This is why WAEC cannot be allowed to investigate WAEC and simply tell Nigerians that everything is fine.

The Federal Ministry of Education, National Assembly and other relevant authorities should urgently demand answers and establish an independent investigation into the conduct and processing of the 2026 WAEC examination.

If WAEC did everything correctly, an independent investigation will clear it.

But if something went terribly wrong, Nigerians deserve to know what happened, who was responsible, how many children were affected and how their futures will be restored.

This is no longer merely an examination issue. It is a question of institutional integrity, accountability and justice for Nigerian children.

We cannot gamble with the destinies of an entire generation.

[Oscar @Oscarsuv]

@Yamal_010 Belligoal

[Oscar @Oscarsuv]

@explorebeauty12 Her bag I guess

[Alex Onyia @winexviv]

What I am hearing about WAEC Nigeria is deeply troubling.

This year recorded the highest performance in the history of WAEC and they are not happy about it.

There is something many Nigerians do not understand about WAEC grading.

The score required for A1, B2, B3, C4 etc. may not simply be a permanently fixed number every year.

From the information available to me, WAEC applies statistical standardisation/normalisation based partly on the overall performance of candidates.

In simple English:

If a paper is unusually difficult and candidates generally perform poorly, the threshold required for a particular grade can effectively be lower.

If candidates perform extraordinarily well, the threshold can become much higher.

So hypothetically, what qualifies as an A in one examination could be around 60, while the statistical threshold in another circumstance could be 80, 90 or even higher.

Your final grade therefore may not tell the complete story of your raw score.

This year involved candidates sitting examinations under different modes, including computer-based/hybrid arrangements and the traditional paper-based system.

And there are serious allegations that questions circulated ahead of time in some paper-based centres.

If that happened on a significant scale, it could artificially inflate the overall performance of that population.

Then comes the critical question:

When WAEC carried out its standardisation, were candidates from fundamentally different examination conditions treated as one population?

Because if leaked questions artificially pushed one group’s scores upwards, and those abnormal scores subsequently influenced grade thresholds, an innocent student who genuinely scored very highly could suddenly appear statistically ordinary.

Imagine scoring what would ordinarily be excellent marks, only to receive a surprisingly poor grade because you were being compared against an abnormal national distribution.

That is the heart of what needs to be investigated.

And it wouldn’t affect only computer-based candidates.

Honest children who wrote paper-based examinations without cheating could also have been punished by the abnormal performance of people who had access to questions.

The innocent students potentially become the victims of the malpractice they never participated in.

This is why WAEC cannot simply tell Nigerians that these children failed.

Show us the data.

What were the raw scores?

What were the score distributions?

What thresholds produced A1, B2, B3, C4, C5 and C6 in each major subject?

Were those thresholds changed after marking?

Were computer-based and paper-based candidates standardised separately?

How were centres showing statistically abnormal performance treated?

And have results changed after candidates requested reviews?

Because I am also receiving disturbing reports that some people who aggressively challenged questionable results got their cases reconsidered, while millions of ordinary parents may not even know they can request a review.

If that is true, it is unacceptable.

A child whose parents have connections cannot have greater access to justice than a child sitting somewhere in a village.

And there is another dimension that must not be ignored: I am receiving serious allegations of internal management problems within WAEC Nigeria, including concerns about how staff who question certain decisions are treated.

Those allegations also deserve an independent investigation.

This is not an attack on WAEC.

It is a demand for accountability.

The Federal Ministry of Education and National Assembly should urgently invite the leadership of WAEC Nigeria.

Because behind every A1, C6 or F9 is not just a statistic.

There is a child. There is a family. There is a university admission. There is a scholarship. There is a future.

We cannot gamble with the destinies of an entire generation of Nigerian children.

[DESMOND-IFY @Desmondify]

@waecnigeria WAEC’s integrity is now seriously being questioned. How can an entire centre have D7 as the dominant grade, with no F9 or E8, while fewer than 15 students achieved C6? This unusual pattern raises serious concerns about the reliability and credibility of the assessment.

[Oscar @Oscarsuv]

@soccertorey Kareem benzema

[Oscar @Oscarsuv]

@UTDIMole Marcus rashy

[Oscar @Oscarsuv]

@winexviv Sir it’s not just the computer based waec candidates that were marked wrongly a lot of us here too

[Alex Onyia @winexviv]

We have now taken legal action against WAEC.

WAEC has 14 days to respond and take appropriate action, failing which we will proceed with litigation.

You can carefully read the details here https://t.co/x1JhbqoKe1 .

There appears to be a serious problem with the recently released results that WAEC has so far refused to publicly acknowledge and address. The consequences are not abstract. Real students are affected. Their admissions, opportunities and futures are at stake.

We cannot sit back and watch an institution as important as WAEC toy with the destinies of young people because it is unwilling to admit that something may have gone wrong.

If there is a glitch, admit it. Investigate it transparently. Fix it. And where students have been wrongly affected, correct their results.

That is what accountability looks like.

No institution should be too big to admit an error, especially when the future of a child may depend on it.

WAEC must be accountable. WAEC must be transparent. And every affected student deserves answers.

[Oscar @Oscarsuv]

@chiamakaafc Kylian Lottin mbappe

[Oscar @Oscarsuv]

@AbuZeenah_ Portugal

[Oscar @Oscarsuv]

@_onlyprof Brazilll

[Oscar @Oscarsuv]

@winexviv Finally the backup we’ve been looking for 🔥🔥