Oulde

Anti-Imperialists lll

[Oulde @Oulde1]

@historigins 🇺🇸 has a substantive welfare program

[Oulde @Oulde1]

@BasilTheGreat Anglos keep winning 🏆

[Oulde @Oulde1]

@SkyNews race war looming in 🇬🇧

[Oulde @Oulde1]

@NJ_Timothy Race war about to erupt in 🇬🇧

[Oulde @Oulde1]

@SattyMootien1 C of E ist kaput

[Oulde @Oulde1]

@BasilTheGreat how did he Scotts let him win an election

[Oulde @Oulde1]

@elonmusk bloody empathy never learn

[Oulde @Oulde1]

@JackPosobiec both

[Oulde @Oulde1]

@lucyjaynewhite1 You sure abt this

[Oulde @Oulde1]

@drhossamsamy65 Arab filth

[Oulde @Oulde1]

@Alexarmstrong black people cannot organise a mere festive 🧐

[Oulde @Oulde1]

@Emmanuel_Tips baldies & hairpiece are Siamese 👯

[Oulde @Oulde1]

@RadioGenoa shitholes 💩 countries

[Creative Deduction @CreativeDeduct]

Adam Smith’s most famous sentence remains one of the clearest statements in all of social science:

“It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest.”

The point is simple and profound. We do not rely on the kindness of strangers to put food on the table. We rely on their self-interest. The butcher supplies meat because he profits by doing so. The baker rises early because customers will pay for bread. Their desire to improve their own condition leads them, without any central direction, to serve ours.

This is the central mechanism of a market economy. Self-interest, channelled through voluntary exchange, produces cooperation on a vast scale. No one has to love their customers or share their political views. They only have to respond to incentives. The result is a system that regularly feeds, clothes, and houses millions of people who will never meet.

Many on the left still struggle to accept this. Self-interest is treated as morally suspect - a form of greed that should be restrained or replaced by appeals to solidarity and collective purpose. The preference is for systems that rely on moral exhortation or state direction rather than on the everyday pursuit of personal advantage. Yet the historical record is clear: societies that suppress self-interest in the name of higher motives tend to produce shortages, stagnation, and coercion. Societies that allow people to benefit from serving others tend to produce abundance.

Smith’s insight is not a celebration of selfishness. It is a recognition of reality. People are more reliable when they can improve their own lives by improving the lives of others. That simple alignment of interests remains the most powerful engine of social cooperation ever discovered.

[Oulde @Oulde1]

@RadioGenoa 😂 Morocco 🇲🇦 prisoners in ceuta

[Oulde @Oulde1]

@AloyEjimakor he is a criminal

[Oulde @Oulde1]

@TRobinsonNewEra Omg

[Oulde @Oulde1]

@Rothmus yet 🇨🇳 is rivalling 🇺🇸 as a global power. Bunch of 🤡

[Camus @newstart_2024]

Jordan Peterson on why “good kids” who never break rules can end up worse off.

Lots of teenagers today don’t drink at all. On the surface that looks positive. But if the reason is zero friends and sitting miserable in a basement, it’s not progress.

He referenced Nietzsche: most morality is cowardice, people too timid to act who then dress up their fear as virtue. The kids in his high school who never touched alcohol weren’t always “good.” Some were simply inhibited.

The data point he raised: adolescents who never break any rules face higher later risk of depression, anxiety, and dependent personality patterns. Those who break every rule often land in serious trouble. The developmental sweet spot sits somewhere in the middle, enough exploration (even risky) to build capacity without total chaos.

Not a call to delinquency. A call to avoid both extremes.

[Oulde @Oulde1]

@BritishBastardX 🤔 what do you people want?