Pablo Sanderman

software dev

[Pablo Sanderman @PabloSanderman]

@Wassimulator wetransfer

[Pablo Sanderman @PabloSanderman]

@tsoding FilePilot is visible tho

[Pablo Sanderman @PabloSanderman]

Facts

[Daniel Lemire @lemire]

I am getting tired of reading 'experts' like LeCun repeatedly claiming that our AIs are nowhere near human-level intelligence.
Let us look at the evidence.
US universities rank students based on standardized tests like the SAT. Current AIs achieve near-perfect SAT scores. They also beat tests like the GRE.
A few years ago, it was notable when early ChatGPT scored ~120 on an IQ test, a common measure of human intelligence. An IQ of 120 is well above average. Current AIs reportedly have IQ scores similar to those of leading scientists.
It is not just in tests. I can ask an AI to produce a science paper that looks undistinguishable from what a PhD level student could do. I just have to give it the data. Better yet, from a prompt, agents can run the experiments and collect the data, and then write the papers.
Those of us who try to get work done with AI know what is possible. You can't possibly just say 'this is nowhere near human-level intelligence'.
In software, good AIs show a greater mastery of, say, C++, than your average software engineering professor. You could just build a formal test to prove it. The difficulty is that the professors would refuse to take your tests.
At this point point, someone will object 'yeah, but your AI can't do this simple thing that we can all do'. Fine. These AIs do not have *human* intelligence. They are very much not human beings. They are something like alien intelligence. They can code straight in assembly language, but have trouble counting characters in words. But that's the result of trade-offs. A dog or a monkey can solve some problems faster than you can.
But let us be fair. As a species, these AIs have definitively 'human-level intelligence'. You can't spend decades setting up cognitive tests for human beings, have these AIs beat us in these tests and then say 'well, that's not real intelligence'. Come on !

[Pablo Sanderman @PabloSanderman]

@AgileJebrim @elonmusk In densily populated area's like the Netherlands or China, it's faster to go with subway + train, then by personal vehicle. It's all about infrastructure. Btw this video is AI

[Pablo Sanderman @PabloSanderman]

@r0chase @davepl1968 @JebraFaushay Nope, just beef, pigs are mostly killed with CO²

[Pablo Sanderman @PabloSanderman]

@KittensSuddenly @HairHustler128 @JebraFaushay True, but they are not arguing against that aaaaaaat all. What matters is that animals are conscious. We can understand how it feels to be gassed alive. And we dont want that, and so do the pigs

[Pablo Sanderman @PabloSanderman]

@davepl1968 @JebraFaushay And i am not saying you are at fault. Its a systemic issue that we dont see what happens to the animals we buy in a nice package in the supermarket. But now thst you know you MIGHT be living in a matrix, will you take the red pill and watch Dominion (doc on yt)

[Pablo Sanderman @PabloSanderman]

@davepl1968 @JebraFaushay Bro, they get gassed to death. 20 to 40 seconds of pure hell. Please watch the videos. I can 100% see how you love them, but your reality is warped. If you actually saw what they go through, and swallowed the red pil, youd be disgusted

[Dr. Jebra Faushay @JebraFaushay]

Billie Eilish says you can’t love animals and eat them because two things cannot “coincide.”

Kind of like how you can’t call out living on stolen land, but actually live on stolen land?

[Pablo Sanderman @PabloSanderman]

@soundpwn @vkrajacic But you did it before me? You used the word: "good".

[Pablo Sanderman @PabloSanderman]

@soundpwn @havefun997 @vkrajacic No, if you say: "nothing can be evil, and slavery was fine", thats inconsistent. It's gotta be: "nothing can be evil, and nothing can be fine".

[Pablo Sanderman @PabloSanderman]

@TheGingerBill Nooo, odin is also impacted by conways law ;-;

[Pablo Sanderman @PabloSanderman]

@vkrajacic I am not saying anything about the video, that's not relevant considering there are straight parents who are worse. I am just curious when you say a child shouldn't have two gay parents... The long term consequences are because of their actions, not because of their gayness.

[Pablo Sanderman @PabloSanderman]

@soundpwn @vkrajacic "two gay guys cannot be good by adopting a child" ... in the eyes of god you mean... Then we will never agree, cause I don't believe in god

[Pablo Sanderman @PabloSanderman]

@vaxryy alfie kohn enters the chat...

[Pablo Sanderman @PabloSanderman]

@cmuratori Gotta maxmaxxingmax