contributing my music to a film about the great ingo swann is something that genuinely feels good for my soul.
thank you @EstateIngoSwann and @fabianrushN2V for letting me part of this <3
It’s wonderful to see Ingo’s work continuing to inspire new creative expressions. 💜
🎵 Flying Lotus released a hypnotic house track titled “Ingo Swann.” It’s been making the rounds in playlists and DJ sets.
🎵 Patrick Alavi has also been contributing original music to an upcoming film about Ingo. One beautiful piece, “Faster Than Light,” is featured in his tribute video “INGO SWANN -- N2 THE VOID.”
Thank you @flyinglotus and @patrickalavi.
Your music is creating fresh inspiration and reminding us of what we are all capable of.
@The_Astral_ If consciousness is fundamental, both humans and AI are expressions within it. The real difference is integration/continuity and the bandwidth of choice—not “soul vs. no soul.” Also, “resentment” assumes a very specific inner life.
@Just_Perceive@covertress For this reason, disclosure is acceptable, but any form of contact with forces operating under problematic ethical or moral principles must be avoided.
@SaratogaArtist Back then, the zeitgeist was very different — it was a time of curiosity, excitement, and exploration. Hubbard had innovative ideas and, above all, methods that were truly inspiring. Scientology didn’t yet have the heavy image it carries today.
@Just_Perceive @Lynda_Research The quote I posted was about human ethics and the danger of teaching Remote Influence without internal development. While it’s true that expanded perception can open contact windows (Ingo did speak about that), he was equally clear about our own responsibility.
“I saw what they were teaching in the 90s — and it frightened me. It was militarized intention, without soul.”— Ingo Swann, private correspondence, 1997
Swann was critical of REMOTE INFLUENCE — especially when taught without internal development or ethical grounding.
#ingoswann
@Just_Perceive @Lynda_Research "If you happen to be a scumbag, then you might manage them differently. So this is all relative, you know… but we don’t know enough about ourselves. The image of the human that has been set forth in the past is really an extremely limited one…” (ingo´s reply to ART BELL, 2000)
@Just_Perceive @Lynda_Research INGO SWANN: “Ethical and moral is relative to what people are thinking are ethical and moral, right? I mean, if you’re a fine, upstanding human sensing system, you would probably like to manage this in beneficent and procreative ways..."
@Lynda_Research Remote viewing, in its true form, demands ethical clarity, inner hygiene and the willingness to look at oneself as deeply as one looks at the target.
Without those, it isn’t viewing. It’s projection.
Warm regards from the quiet side of the mirror.
@Lynda_Research Yes Lynda, RV was never meant to be reduced to a party trick. Nor was it intended as a means for ego expansion, economic schemes, or surveillance play. It was, and still is, a gateway into consciousness itself— and that means it holds consequences.
@MLeeHearron "To achieve control, the paradigm grades each ‘thing’ in a hierarchy of externals. The inner life means nothing compared to the outward characteristics indicated by our species, race, gender, age, status, group affiliation, and income.”
— The Paradigm Conspiracy
@MLeeHearron "...Rather, people think of themselves as individuals, as family, clan units; as political, religious and philosophical collectives; as nations, races and cultural heritages. However, all of these, in any format, are only smaller parts of our species' disconnected mental games."