Patrick Crebbin

[illuminatibot @iluminatibot]

That is crazy

[redpillbot @redpillb0t]

I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a "things aren't adding up and it's pretty obvious" theorist.

[illuminatibot @iluminatibot]

The more you know, the crazier you look.

[Patrick Crebbin @PatrickCrebbin]

@digijordan It's has been labeled "nonexistent ", like the Epstein list.

[Patrick Crebbin @PatrickCrebbin]

@ufob0t Or morph real matter into dark matter? Not really. Dark matter only exists in math problems, not reality.

[Patrick Crebbin @PatrickCrebbin]

@ThoughtCrimes07 @MrAndyNgo Karma!

[Jordan Crowder @digijordan]

Alright, let’s dive into this speculative exercise based on Ross Coulthart’s hints about a UFO so massive that a building was constructed over it. Coulthart’s clues include: it’s outside the United States, under U.S. congressional oversight, serves a “laudatory purpose,” is of interest to the U.S., UK, and Australia, and has been operational for decades. He also implies it’s in a country allied with the U.S., and he’s hesitant to reveal the location due to security concerns or the risk of public frenzy. Since this is a guess, I’ll piece together the puzzle with some informed reasoning.
First, the country. The mention of shared interests with the U.S., UK, and Australia immediately points to the Five Eyes intelligence alliance, which includes these three plus Canada and New Zealand. This alliance involves deep cooperation on surveillance and security, making it plausible that a facility tied to such a secret would be located in one of these nations. It’s explicitly not in the U.S., so that leaves Canada, Australia, New Zealand, or the UK. The “decades” hint suggests a site established during the Cold War era, when UFO retrieval programs might have kicked into gear, and the U.S. was expanding its global military footprint with allies.
Next, the “laudatory purpose.” This is tricky—laudatory means praiseworthy, so the building’s public-facing role should be something noble or beneficial, possibly masking its true purpose. Military bases or intelligence hubs might not fit this perfectly, as their purpose is strategic rather than overtly humanitarian. However, a facility with a dual role—say, scientific research or international cooperation—could qualify.
Let’s narrow it down. Canada has vast remote areas, ideal for hiding something huge, but its major bases (like CFB Cold Lake) don’t scream “laudatory” or international significance beyond defense. New Zealand’s small size and limited U.S. presence make it less likely—there’s no obvious candidate facility with decades of history and Five Eyes prominence. The UK is intriguing; it’s close to the U.S., has a long history of joint operations, and hosts American forces. But its dense population and lack of massive, isolated structures built over something “unmovable” make it a stretch.
Australia stands out. It’s remote, has vast deserts for secrecy, and hosts Pine Gap, a joint U.S.-Australian intelligence facility near Alice Springs. Operational since 1970, Pine Gap fits the “decades” criterion and is under U.S. congressional oversight as part of the Five Eyes network. Its official purpose—signals intelligence and satellite surveillance—ties to national security, which could be spun as “laudatory” in the sense of protecting the free world. The site’s isolation in the Outback makes it feasible that a massive object could’ve crashed or been discovered there, with construction discreetly covering it up. The U.S. has significant control, yet it’s outside American soil, aligning with Coulthart’s hints.
Now, the building itself. Pine Gap isn’t one structure but a complex of domes and facilities. If we’re guessing a single building, the largest and most iconic there is the main operations center, a heavily secured, sprawling structure. Its exact size isn’t public, but the complex covers kilometers, and early construction photos show significant earth-moving—plausible for concealing something enormous. Theories on forums like Reddit suggest a UFO could’ve been found buried or crashed in the desert, with Pine Gap built around it under the guise of a spy base.
Why Pine Gap over, say, a random observatory or UN building elsewhere? Other candidates—like the Svalbard Seed Vault in Norway (laudatory but not U.S.-controlled) or South Korea’s alleged Seoul site (not Five Eyes)—don’t match all clues as neatly. Pine Gap’s secrecy, U.S.-led history, and alliance ties make it the strongest fit. Coulthart’s reluctance to name it could stem from its active role in intelligence.

[Patrick Crebbin @PatrickCrebbin]

@TRUMP_ARMY_ Thumbs 👍

[Patrick Crebbin @PatrickCrebbin]

@TuckerCNews Yes.

[Patrick Crebbin @PatrickCrebbin]

@Inga_C8 A bad penny...

[Patrick Crebbin @PatrickCrebbin]

@sirtemplemount @RealAlexJones I think he already had his revoked by Trump.

[Patrick Crebbin @PatrickCrebbin]

@LauraLoomer @realDonaldTrump @marcorubio You are a great sleuth, Laura! Appreciate your insight and intelligence.

[Patrick Crebbin @PatrickCrebbin]

@Rebellious1776X @TaraBull808 They are "paid" protesters doing their job.