Defending Trinity & Paul

Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit - Matthew 28:19

[Defending Trinity & Paul @PaulDefend48276]

Thread 1/12
Muslims often claim the Christian Trinity is polytheism (shirk)— "partners" to Allah. But this confuses tritheism with the actual Trinity: 1 God in 3 internal expressions of operation. Let's dismantle this and show how the Quran makes the same human logic error.

[Defending Trinity & Paul @PaulDefend48276]

@IjazTheTrini @Jay_49erTikTok I command to you our sister Phoebe, a deacon of the church in Cenchreae - Romans 16:1

No what?

[Defending Trinity & Paul @PaulDefend48276]

@CertainSpeaks @GodLogic_GL @InspiringPhilos My question to you. How would you expect an interaction to be like in the trinity?

[Defending Trinity & Paul @PaulDefend48276]

@americanminivan Like uniterian?

[Defending Trinity & Paul @PaulDefend48276]

@tiredoftheShlt @Acts17David Let me guess you "respect" Jesus

[Defending Trinity & Paul @PaulDefend48276]

@Moood051 @SalmanS74944141 @InspiringPhilos And despite you're thinking your so clever, you go and flatter the word "before" to always mean foreknown. Despite the fact the Greek word used hopou ēn to proteron

Meaning:
“where He formerly was.”

Not foreknown, predestined. There are other Greek words for that.

[Defending Trinity & Paul @PaulDefend48276]

@Moood051 @SalmanS74944141 @InspiringPhilos You're argument is completely incoherent.

What is even more bizarre is you took the position that on the one hand humans pre-existed in heaven without script but on the other hand every script of Christ stating he pre-existed is nothing but foreknown instead.

Incoherent logic.

[Defending Trinity & Paul @PaulDefend48276]

@Moood051 @SalmanS74944141 @InspiringPhilos How does He now say, ‘I have come down from heaven’? John 6:42

This verse nullifies you're rediculious claim humans pre-existed in heaven.Because if this was true why would this be such a shock to them?

Why would even foreknown be such a shock to them?

[Defending Trinity & Paul @PaulDefend48276]

@Moood051 @SalmanS74944141 @InspiringPhilos Prophetic past concerns future events, not prior personal existence. If Jesus merely meant I was foreordained, he would of corrected them instead what you find is their reaction makes little sense to what you're trying to force in interpretation.

[Defending Trinity & Paul @PaulDefend48276]

@0786Anon @dawahxdialogues It would of been best if you listened and moved on.

Calling Wood a rapist for sleeping with a 13 year old by your own standard Muhammed is far worse for a 9 year old

There is a big difference between kissing a live boy which Muhammed did to resurrecting a boy.

[Defending Trinity & Paul @PaulDefend48276]

@Moood051 @SalmanS74944141 @InspiringPhilos Provide a citation from an academy or by dictionary that proves pre-existence and foreknown means the same thing. They are interchangeable words.

If they are not by what criteria do you distinguish between the two words.

[Defending Trinity & Paul @PaulDefend48276]

@Moood051 @SalmanS74944141 @InspiringPhilos My guy the fault with you is you think preexisting and foreknown means the same thing.

[Defending Trinity & Paul @PaulDefend48276]

@0786Anon @dawahxdialogues Accept what I wrote and move on.

[Defending Trinity & Paul @PaulDefend48276]

@0786Anon @dawahxdialogues I think people can be forgiven of their past sins.

I also think Islam is a terrible waste of time.

[Defending Trinity & Paul @PaulDefend48276]

@CertainSpeaks A human begets a human
A dog begets a dog

Each according to its same nature.

God begets God.

If God begets God it is of the same nature. Aseity. Therefore we are dealing with beget of intellect and not beget of sexual intercause.

[Defending Trinity & Paul @PaulDefend48276]

@Moood051 @SalmanS74944141 @InspiringPhilos And pre-existence has its own language.

a subject personally exists prior to a defined temporal boundary event.

And pre-existence is not interchangeable with foreknowledge or predestination.

Correct?

[Defending Trinity & Paul @PaulDefend48276]

@Moood051 @SalmanS74944141 @InspiringPhilos Ok so preordination has specific language to it.

events,
outcomes,
future certainty,
divine planning

Correct?

[Defending Trinity & Paul @PaulDefend48276]

@Moood051 @SalmanS74944141 @InspiringPhilos You state the following (What’s true of pre-existence statements must be true of preordained statements.)

Different grammatical communication.

The president was in my plans before the company existed.

VS

The president returned to where he was before the company existed

[Defending Trinity & Paul @PaulDefend48276]

@Moood051 @SalmanS74944141 @InspiringPhilos Give me you're understanding of pre-existence. In other words give me a sentence.