@dio_ianakiara 6/ Answer the question. How many KLV coins will the team have left after the sale? What would be the motivation to work on token value if you got rid of a huge chunk of your coins?
@dio_ianakiara 3/ In fact, the team decides to sell the Klever fund's assets for cheap. If an investor gives up his coins (most of his portfolio) he becomes much less motivated to promote that asset.
@dio_ianakiara 4/ Personally, I have never seen a public offering of stocks or cryptocurrencies that would increase the value of the underlying asset
With such a move, the price of KLV is likely to fall below $0.003.
@dio_ianakiara 7/ We believe in the project, and we've come a very long way with you. But we need answers to our questions. Otherwise, we can only hope your actions are logical and appropriate. We don't want to believe that you are incompetent by selling an asset at the bottom of the market
@dio_ianakiara 1/ So, you intend to sell more than 1.5 billion KLV. With a 36-month lock this amount will increase to 2.6 billion tokens.
Why are you doing this at the bottom of the market? Why didn't you do it at a KLV price of $0.1
@dio_ianakiara 5/ Your actions do not add optimism. Distribution of tokens, private seals and other initial funding takes place at the start of the project but not in 4 years after its creation. You have already conducted 3 rounds of sales and want to conduct the 4th.
@dio_ianakiara 2/ Investors make the decision to invest based on the project's long-term plan. If a project intends to sell nearly a third of its entire coin circulation, this should be announced in advance, not the way it is done now, in a hurry, at the lowest prices.
@dio_ianakiara Klever argued that they have development funds for the time of the bear market. If additional funding is needed, the developer should explain the value of this solution to the community.