Paul B. Selby

[Paul B. Selby @PBSelbyGenetics]

@WakeUpPatriott No

[Paul B. Selby @PBSelbyGenetics]

@WHLeavitt YES

[Paul B. Selby @PBSelbyGenetics]

@TrumpNewsFanss YES

[Paul B. Selby @PBSelbyGenetics]

@MAGANEWS_X F.

[Paul B. Selby @PBSelbyGenetics]

@EvaWillaim D

[Paul B. Selby @PBSelbyGenetics]

@HomanNews Yes

[Paul B. Selby @PBSelbyGenetics]

@WHLeavitt @LeaderJohnThune YES

[Paul B. Selby @PBSelbyGenetics]

@MAGAVoice @LeaderJohnThune 👍

[Paul B. Selby @PBSelbyGenetics]

@BasedMikeLee 1. Yes
2. No

[Paul B. Selby @PBSelbyGenetics]

@Matt_Pinner coin purse

[Paul B. Selby @PBSelbyGenetics]

@Mr_Husky1 weights for a cuckoo clock

[Paul B. Selby @PBSelbyGenetics]

The extreme conclusions of the BEAR I report in 1956 played a major role in the broad acceptance of such concepts as the Linear Non-Threshold (LNT) dose response, ALARA, the precautionary principle, and the doubling-dose concept. Edward J. Calabrese and I recently analyzed the transcripts of the BEAR I Panel’s meetings and related correspondence and concluded that its extreme conclusions were based much more on fiction than on fact. Read the cited paper if you want to understand why: DOI: 10.1097/HP.0000000000002088 (also available at https://t.co/asFwdaWI16). If you agree with us, ponder the costs to society of still applying those outdated concepts.

[Paul B. Selby @PBSelbyGenetics]

@WHLeavitt @LeaderJohnThune All of the above

[Paul B. Selby @PBSelbyGenetics]

@KiNcDola YES

[Paul B. Selby @PBSelbyGenetics]

@coffee_anytime YES

[Paul B. Selby @PBSelbyGenetics]

@HomanNews Yes

[Paul B. Selby @PBSelbyGenetics]

@HomanNews @karolineleavitt ♥️

[Paul B. Selby @PBSelbyGenetics]

@StandUpForTrmp Zero

[Paul B. Selby @PBSelbyGenetics]

@Matt_Pinner 11

[Paul B. Selby @PBSelbyGenetics]

@RedEagleUpdates Zero