Revise and Resubmit

Academic Peer Review and You

[matti heino @Heinonmatti]

E.g. the ²-part of eta-squared conveniently deleted, all BCa changed to Bca, CI changed to Ci... can I bill for my correction work?

[matti heino @Heinonmatti]

Is it normal that page proofs from journal contain many more errors than the submitted manuscript? I wonder what we paid $$$ for...

[Revise and Resubmit @PeerRev]

Amazing? Study shows published articles resubmitted to the same journals get (a) reviewed again! and (b) rejected! https://t.co/svQ4ZU5ENW

[Revise and Resubmit @PeerRev]

Just got back the longest peer review ever. It took over 5,400 words for Reviewer 1 to say "no." Can anyone beat that?!

["The Ween Dad" @ween_dad]

#ica16, @jivory suggests amnesty, honesty about past QRPs as "product of the time", identified and forgiven.

[Brian Nosek (@[email protected]) @BrianNosek]

Thrilled to announce $7.5 million core support from @LJA_Foundation to scale @OSFramework: https://t.co/UgJ2dgtDyT

[Reviewer Number 3 @thirdreviewer]

Always gratifying to see your comments change the paper in meaningful ways

[F1000Research @F1000Research]

Immediate publication of articles, posters and slides. Find out why you should publish your work with F1000Research
https://t.co/0jybYyHQPP

[Alexander Grossmann @SciPubLab]

Too long? Av time between receival & acceptance at research journals is 75–175 days https://t.co/Ol9tYsCxWJ @dhimmel

[Revise and Resubmit @PeerRev]

@BrianNosek @brainsidea This only shows its harder to publish when p > .05 than when p < .05. Its a publication bias, not a researcher bias

[Revise and Resubmit @PeerRev]

Publication decisions should consider the quality of the paper AND its peer reviewers. But only the paper is judged; never the reviewers!!

[Grumpy Reviewer @GrumpyJReviewer]

Keep calm? I've been waiting 18 months for peer review. Hurry up already.

[Revise and Resubmit @PeerRev]

In #openpeerreview is there a conflict of interest for someone who has recently been rejected by Dr X to be a peer reviewer of Dr Xs paper?

[Revise and Resubmit @PeerRev]

What turns a perfectly normal academic into "Reviewer 2" and is there a vaccine against it? #drjekyllandmrhyde

[PRE @PeerReviewEval]

Major publisher retracts 64 scientific papers in fake peer review outbreak https://t.co/voDbkyoJbp

[PRE @PeerReviewEval]

We found the very best peer review resources and put them all in one place: https://t.co/Vs0YJ2h9QN. Tutorials, best practices, and research

[Reviewer Number 3 @thirdreviewer]

Honestly I was being sarcastic when I said that cutting all words & figures from the paper would be an improvement https://t.co/nKyD0gnN4u

[Grumpy Reviewer @GrumpyJReviewer]

Reject! No resubmission!

[Fatih Akturk 파티 @fakturk]

Read, Write, Rinse, Repeat (via @PHDcomics) https://t.co/Kv42DObUeH … #4wordacademicsadstory

[Javier Carmona 🇪🇺 @FJCarmonas]

Will post-publication #peerreview improve traditional review systems?–Better combine both #openscience @Science_Open https://t.co/Q0AwSgpiNq