Peg

travel agent who loves travelling and dabbling with pottery

[Afghan Zoroastrian @AfgZoroastrian]

Every woman should fear this!

[Sharron Davies HoL MBE @sharrond62]

If interested in actual facts & figures this site & X account is amazing at correlation of results where males have stolen 100s if not 1000s of places, prize money, positions, awards & opportunities from females in womens sporting events. Remember this is a men’s rights movement. Women lose out every time.

[Chris Littlewood @chrislittlewoo8]

Digital ID for every adult is not progress. It is the end of a free society dressed up as convenience.

I am a cyber security specialist. This is my take.

They are selling it as a fix for illegal migration. That is bollocks.

We spend hundreds of billions a year on cyber security and yet the volume of breaches is breaking records. The threat is growing faster than the spend.

Digital ID will not stop boats. It will not stop trafficking gangs. It will not fix a broken border.

Criminals will work around it.

Honest citizens will pay the price.

It builds giant data banks that track where you go, what you buy, what you read and who you speak to.

It links your identity to every checkpoint in daily life.

One breach and your life is exposed.

Look at Jaguar Land Rover and the airports in recent weeks. Now imagine that at national scale on an ID system tied to everything you need to live your daily life.

Here is the risk that ministers will not admit.

Ransomware seeded through a supplier or an insider:

It lies quiet for months.
It rolls through the backups.
On trigger day the register and the recovery sets are both encrypted.

Payments fail. Health and benefits stall. Borders slow. Citizens are frozen out until a ransom is paid or the state rebuilds from scratch.

Centralise identity and you centralise failure.

Do not fall for the pitch.
Function creep is certain.
It starts as login.

It becomes access to money, travel, speech and public services.

It turns rights into permissions controlled by the state and its contractors.

It creates a single point of failure for criminals, insiders and hostile states to target.

It will punish the elderly, the poor and anyone who is not always online.

It will centralise risk and outsource blame.

It will not stop fraud.

It will not stop illegal migration.

It will build the machinery for a social credit system by stealth.

If ministers cared about the border, they would enforce current laws, resource patrols and processing, close loopholes and remove those with no right to stay.

You do not need a national ID to do any of that.

We scrapped ID cards in 2010 for a reason.
��Britain does not need a central register to prove age or status.

Yes to privacy first proofs. No to a database state.

[Claire Fox @Fox_Claire]

I was shaking from head to toe last week during this speech, such is the weight of responsibility RE the #AssistedDyingBill. Supporters of law change have loudly complained we shouldn't call it assisted 'suicide', as they argue it is offensive. But linguistic policing won't stop this Bill becoming a state-backed SUICIDE influencer, and will send a cultural message to all - especially the young - that some suicides equate to 'dying in dignity'.

[WDI.Afghanistan @WDIAfghanistan1]

Breaking news:- I tell you very clear this is the end of line for . afghan women ⬇️😾
The Taliban have ordered the Ministry of Telecommunications to obtain formal guarantees from telecom companies to provide Afghan users’ calls, data, and digital activity to the group’s security agencies. Local sources in Kandahar report that Taliban leader Hibatullah Akhundzada issued the directive.
According to the order, telecom companies must create special codes that, once triggered by a user, will automatically transfer all call logs, messages, and digital activity to Taliban intelligence.
Experts warn this decision could severely restrict freedom of expression and citizens' privacy.

[EarthDetective @EarthDetect]

This is the cleanest our air has been for some years. PM2.5 chart. Long may it last.

[Corinne Nokel @CorinneNokel]

University of Cambridge

Undergraduate Teaching 2025 - 2026

Medical Applications of the Internet of Bio-Nano Things

Intra-Body Nanonetworks

Neural Interface

https://t.co/Ot1WUetqHK

[Corinne Nokel @CorinneNokel]

Doctors logging into bodies

Nurses logging into bodies

Insurance companies logging into bodies

#SabrinaWallace #CoVWBAN

An Intelligent and Energy-Efficient Wireless Body Area Network to Control Coronavirus Outbreak (2021)

https://t.co/p7R8YBS0w5

[Dennis Noel Kavanagh @Jebadoo2]

1/ The single worst thing about political transvestism is it taught a generation of children there was nothing beyond the self. Where they should have looked outwards and experienced this wonderful planet, they looked inwards and meditated on the false god of “gender”.

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

🙄The fringe idea that we all have a 'gender identity' that may or may not match our biological sex is the whole point of this discussion. Trans activists act as though the existence of 'gender identity' is a settled, self-evident point, when to the vast majority of the world it's unevidenced, quasi-religious, pseudoscientific nonsense, which has been imposed top down on our society with serious consequences for vulnerable women and troubled youth in particular.

Meaningful discussion about competing needs and rights cannot happen inside an elitist ideological bubble where everyone is forced to adopt gender ideology's approved jargon, accept its self-contradicting slogans as fact and pretend fact-light assertions and feeble sophistry are critical thinking.

You tell us to 'educate' ourselves, by which you mean, 'adopt our beliefs unquestioningly,' but at this point, most of us know your arguments off by heart. These include, but are not limited to: feelings trump facts and unless we agree we're 'erasing people from existence'; women and girls aren't definable entities, so why should they be entitled to their own sports and single-sex spaces; clownfish and people with DSDs mean sex is 'on a spectrum' and 'woman' is a set of stereotypes associated with the female sex class, so it doesn't matter if you've got a penis, if you identify with those stereotypes you're 'valid'.

The reason we haven't been won over by these talking points and remain so tragically 'uneducated' isn't that we've failed to grasp the sophistication of your world view. It's that we think you're talking unadulterated bullshit and making fools of yourselves.

[Nelly Tells @NellyTells]

Most likely the PR company, some group like Hill & Knowlton & their strategic arm. Worked on the ‘Iraq babies thrown from incubators’ story & for the WHO in 2020.

[Bruce Bowman @boswelltoday]

Day 10 Afternoon Session - Peggie v NHS Fife & Dr Upton

NHS Fife’s Leadership Runs Out of Road – Tribunal Exposes Institutional Failure

As the tribunal resumed after lunch, the pressure only mounted on NHS Fife’s leadership. The morning’s session had already exposed the institutional cowardice at play, but as the panel and judge pressed further, it became clear just how deep the rot runs. Esther Davidson’s evasions and contradictions continued, but now under the scrutiny of the tribunal panel members, who were clearly becoming less patient with the incoherent justifications and lack of documentation.

The questioning started with basic procedural failures, with Davidson admitting that there was no formal documentation for key decisions, despite suspension being one of the most serious actions an employer can take. Even the judge seemed exasperated, pointing out that, as a senior leader, it was not unreasonable to expect her to keep notes of critical decisions. But, as with everything in this case, proper process only seemed to apply when it was working against Sandy Peggie, not in her favour.

When asked directly, Davidson confirmed that NHS Fife had decided from the start that Dr Upton had an unquestionable right to the female changing room, based solely on advice from Isla Bumba, the Equality and Diversity lead. There had been no meaningful discussion about how this would impact female staff, nor had any consideration been given to practical solutions. Instead, the entire responsibility was placed on Peggie to tolerate the situation, while management washed its hands of any responsibility.

The tribunal panel then turned to another key issue—whether anyone in NHS Fife’s leadership had actually taken the time to investigate what had happened, rather than just assuming Peggie was the problem. It quickly became apparent that the decision to suspend her had been based on assumptions, vague accusations, and hearsay, rather than any proper review of the facts. Davidson could not even remember when she had first seen the formal complaint, and had no idea whether key witnesses had even been spoken to before action was taken against Peggie.

The question of fairness then took centre stage, with the tribunal panel asking why senior charge nurses had not been informed earlier that Peggie had serious concerns. Davidson’s response was another exercise in excuse-making, insisting that she had “passed it on” in an informal manner. Yet, despite being a senior leader responsible for ensuring fair treatment, she had made no effort to confirm that Peggie was properly informed or supported. The reality is simple: no one in NHS Fife’s management structure wanted to deal with the fallout of telling a male doctor he could not use a female space, so they made Peggie the problem instead.

Then came one of the most revealing moments of the day. The tribunal judge questioned Davidson directly on whether the concerns about Peggie’s conduct were serious enough to justify suspension. Davidson was forced to admit that the guidance she had received from senior leadership was that suspension was only justified if patient care was compromised. But when pushed, she could provide no evidence that patient care had ever been put at risk. Yet again, the justification for punishing Peggie fell apart under scrutiny.

Finally, the afternoon session turned to NHS Fife’s handling of key evidence and procedural delays, with lawyers from both sides locking horns over document requests, forensic examinations of Dr Upton’s phone, and the sheer mess of missing records. It became increasingly obvious that NHS Fife’s leadership had either failed to keep track of critical evidence or was deliberately obstructing its release. The tribunal judge ordered additional submissions and scheduling adjustments, as the case dragged further into July.

By the end of the day, one thing was clear: this is no longer just about a single employment dispute—it is about a systemic failure of leadership. The senior executives and board of NHS Fife have spent months dodging accountability, hoping that Peggie would simply disappear under the weight of bureaucracy and process. But now, with their own managers struggling to explain their decisions, the tribunal is running out of patience. There is no amount of policy jargon, procedural excuses, or activist talking points that can hide the truth forever—and when that truth fully emerges, it will land squarely at the feet of NHS Fife’s leadership.

Thank you all for following along—it's been fun, hasn’t it? We truly appreciate all the engagement, support, and sharp-eyed commentary throughout this tribunal. Your interest and commitment to holding institutions to account make all the difference. We’ll do our very best to be back in July when the hearings resume, and rest assured, we’ll be keeping a close watch on every twist and turn. Until then, take care, and we’ll see you soon!

Now for a drink!

[Raja Miah @recusant_raja]

Oldham Just Rejected Labour’s Whitewash Inquiry. Now the Home Secretary Has a Problem.

I don’t think people fully grasp what happened in Oldham last night. We forced every single councillor in an @UKLabour run council to reject @YvetteCooperMP’s plan for a toothless local rape gang inquiry. An inquiry designed to go nowhere and protect those who enabled these crimes.

Now, the Home Secretary, @jessphillips and the Labour Party leadership are in a mess. The one town singled out for investigation has just told the government that their proposal for a local inquiry is a sham, that it lacks the powers needed to get anywhere near the truth.

The legacy media will try to keep this quiet and even if they share the story, they will downplay the ramifications. Which is why it’s up to us to make sure the pressure doesn’t fade.

Because let’s be clear - all we are asking for is a National Inquiry into the confirmed, industrial-scale gang rape of tens, if not hundreds of thousands, of this nation’s children. That this is being resisted should tell you everything.

The fight isn’t over. The truth won’t expose itself.

💥 My goal: 10 new newsletter subscribers a day. It’s where I document the evidence, the investigations, and the fight for justice. Subscribe for free, or support for just 75p a week or £30 a year.

👉 https://t.co/56iWix5yC4

Don’t want to commit? A one-off contribution keeps this work alive.
👉 https://t.co/kvFfhHNJ03
👉 https://t.co/8Og0hDKfjy

If we don’t keep pushing, they win. Stand with me. Help secure the National Inquiry.
👉 https://t.co/56iWix5yC4

[Mimi @Mimiandsimba]

As we move through these challenging times, the importance of research has never been more apparent.
Thank you for considering supporting this project. Let's work hand in hand for the health and wellbeing of all

[Peg @PegPots]

Thank you Caroline and the team for all you too, I have been subscribing for the last couple of years and can say hands down following the research and advice - I rarely get sick !

[Corinne Nokel @CorinneNokel]

@djindji5 https://t.co/tHGMFl5BCW

https://t.co/ad7I1erbJS

[James Lindsay, anti-Communist @ConceptualJames]

One of the most important lessons I've ever learned came from the skeptic community, and it's this: scientists are almost always completely useless, or worse than useless, at detecting and unmasking deception. We must be cautious, as we've learned, with deference to scientists.🧵

[Mimi @Mimiandsimba]

https://t.co/4A7V3eU45T

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

You can keep telling yourself this, but you're simply wrong. I'm a left-leaning liberal who's fiercely anti-authoritarian, and if you couldn't deduce that from my work you haven't understood a word of it.

I'm not an ideologue. I mistrust ideologies. I've never met an ideologue who wasn't prepared to deny a bit of inconvenient truth to keep their world view intact and I include ideologies with which I find myself in broad sympathy. On the other hand, I am an idealist. I believe in human beings. We are undeniably capable of terrible acts, but the evidence is that we are astoundingly collaborative and mutually supportive, especially when times are hard.

My values haven't changed; what's changed is the political landscape. What was once my natural home (a pragmatic centre-left party focused on dealing with economic disparity, championing social liberalism and equal rights) is now dominated by an illiberal, identity-based strain of politics I consider elitist, harmful and out of touch with the day-to-day concerns of regular people, particularly women (and I've still lived more than half of my life as a non-wealthy woman, and some of that time was spent in poverty).

There are women with whom I make common cause in the TERF wars I disagree with on other things. Within obvious limits (sucking up to literal Nazis) I don't particularly care about their personal politics. The reality is that there's currently an assault on women's rights unparalleled in my lifetime, and it's coming from both left and right. If ever there was a time for women across the political spectrum to come together, it is now.