Danielle

Mom. Wife. Bio/Biotech PhD Candidate.
Molecular/Cell Bio 🔬 Metabolism 🧬 Synthetic Bio 🧪 Evolutionary Bio 🐸 Unaccredited Comedian🫠

[Danielle @PettyHypothesis]

Things Big Pharma doesn't want you to know... Pt.1:

This plant is Artemesia annua... AKA: Sweet wormwood. It is easy to grow and produces antimicrobial compounds with indications in fighting treatment resistant malaria... oh, and at least 3 strains of SARS-CoV-2.
Might be worth planting now... you know, in case the world decides to throw another plot twist.
Dry the leaves and stash them for tea—they’ll stay effective for years. The best part? The tea won't cause sudden death and Pfizer doesn’t make a dime 😉

[Danielle @PettyHypothesis]

@mysticgypsy311 https://t.co/EBfiNL4xZZ
Let them do their job... 💯

[Danielle @PettyHypothesis]

@OneKnightFury Louder for the monologing narcissist in the back! 🙌🤣

[Danielle @PettyHypothesis]

@badgoyfleet is my hero...

[ADFleet @badgoyfleet]

We Don't Want the Juice - Fleet 🧃 ...the greedy, spoiled juice, that is... Goy Vey. IYKYK.

[Danielle @PettyHypothesis]

@AmyAdams_5 @mysticgypsy311 @badgoyfleet Yesss! Pure gold!

[Danielle @PettyHypothesis]

Photo review from another lovely, satisfied customer! 😂

If anyone else wants their own personalized “the government is a hoe” shirt/hoodie/crewneck... my DMs are open.❤️

Because if the government is going to screw us, the least we can do is dress for the occasion. 😉🤭

Spreading awareness, one inappropriate outfit at a time.

[Danielle @PettyHypothesis]

@mysticgypsy311 #combatcandy

[Danielle @PettyHypothesis]

@TSprinkles98648

[Danielle @PettyHypothesis]

@TSprinkles98648 TIA soap...
This Is Africa 😅🤣🤣

[Danielle @PettyHypothesis]

@BSnides You better be fucking wrong bro.

[Danielle @PettyHypothesis]

@SlimThrowing @DoolieShan19563 Nevermind... I just saw where is says "cant wait to come back" 😭... my bad

[Danielle @PettyHypothesis]

@SlimThrowing @DoolieShan19563 Is this a San Diego specific thing? I'm gonna be in San Diego in December... looking for things to do when I'm not at the cell bio conference...

[Danielle @PettyHypothesis]

Whew... okay, now I get it. 😂

Here I was thinking you could actually think critically, but apparently basic reading comprehension is already a bit beyond your reach.

I'm gonna go ahead and keep it moving. It's been... an experience. And I do appreciate your replies. I just hope they weren't too mentally taxing for you to put together.

Good luck out there. You're gonna need it. 🫡

[Danielle @PettyHypothesis]

The problem is that your “first step” is fundamentally flawed.
In many cases, peer review amounts to little more than a gatekeeping racket masquerading as scientific validation.

If you want to challenge the findings, why not actually examine the data and identify a methodological flaw or misrepresented result worth discussing?

Otherwise, you're just lazily casting doubt based on your own biases without offering a shred of evidence to support your criticism.

Which, ironically, is exactly what you're accusing @P_McCulloughMD of doing.

Or am I missing something? 🙄

[Danielle @PettyHypothesis]

@LarryGreer20 @P_McCulloughMD Wow, what a brilliant and well reasoned response. I'm totally convinced, even though you haven't actually made a point. Thanks so much. 🙄

[Danielle @PettyHypothesis]

The peer-review system is inherently flawed and riddled with bias.

Are you genuinely unaware of this, or are you deliberately feigning ignorance of the well-documented reproducibility crisis in scientific research?

A troubling amount of supposedly “peer-reviewed” research cannot be independently replicated. Studies that challenge prevailing scientific narratives struggle to secure funding or publication, and publication bias is hardly some closely guarded secret.

More importantly, “peer-reviewed” does not mean the underlying data have been independently verified. Reviewers evaluate the methodology, analysis, and conclusions presented to them. They aren't conducting forensic audits to determine whether researchers have fabricated, manipulated, or selectively reported their findings.

None of this is breaking news. And a study's failure to make it through a flawed publication system is not, in itself, evidence that the research lacks scientific validity.

Treating peer review as some infallible seal of scientific truth isn't scientific rigor. It's irresponsible, blind faith in a system whose limitations have been repeatedly exposed.

You're welcome.

[Danielle @PettyHypothesis]

@exxfive @P_McCulloughMD @grok Grok, and all AI LLMs, are only as accurate as the information being fed to them.

[Danielle @PettyHypothesis]

Here is your friendly reminder that AI is not a substitute for critical thinking or common sense 😉

[Danielle @PettyHypothesis]

“Back to the left”? Why wait? 🤣

You've accomplished precisely nothing in terms of reuniting Republican voters, so I hope this isn't an attempt at some kind of mis-guided victory lap.

And frankly, unity for unity's sake is not worth pursuing. You will not convince people to unifiy with those whose loyalty to Israel outweighs their concern for America. It's not gonna happen...

So, by all means, head back now. You've clearly been punching above your weight trying to intellectually spar with the so-called “conspiracy retard blackpillers.”

The left seems like a more comfortable intellectual weight class for you. 🤷‍♀️🫡

[Stew Peters @realstewpeters]

Best anti-Israel ad ever.

[Danielle @PettyHypothesis]

This is such an accurate take... ☠️.

The difference in stress tolerance is almost comical.
Some people hear raised voices and experience a crisis. The rest of us are just trying to figure out if this is a situation that actually warrants getting off the couch. 😭🤣

Forged in dysfunction.

We’re Joker-dancing down the stairs, casually strolling away from an exploding hospital, and wondering why everyone else is panicking. 😭🤣

[Danielle @PettyHypothesis]

@Credo_AF_ What is pear? What does that mean? 🤣