@hankrsmith “That rhetoric opens the door to seeing Latter-day Saints as something less than human”
Wow. That kind of rhetoric leads straight to everyone wearing pajamas out in public.
@Fearless__Truth Take a moment. Think. Step back and look.
“”We are cancer free. Those guys are “cancer free” in a colloquial sense.””
Seems like a waste of air to utter the latter in light of the former. Fools would act as if this is meaningful sentiment to offer the “cancer free” folk.
@NWSPaducah I need a detailed explanation on why we were in a pds tornado watch since 2:40 because my wife wants to kill me for listening to y’all. Some local meteorologist “grant” told her it was not gonna happen till late tonight yesterday. Now I’m the jerk. 😂 but really
@cknze1 If you are arguing on his example you missed the point. His point allows for your position to be argued. His point doesn’t allow for someone to argue that 0 and non-zero answers have no qualitative difference.
That’s what he is addressing, not what you have misunderstood.
@thorku A fool would bet his house that Banks will never be a brilliant pick. If he does meet his upside, the hypothetical extra later picks will never be talked about.
I do get the point of getting extra picks and picking him at 23, if that assumption was true.
We’ll see. You rock.