@pastorlocke "Not everyone who says Lord, Lord... but the one who does the will of my father." Mt. 7:21. Jesus said, "Whoever rejects you [apostles and apostolic successors] rejects me, and whoever rejects me rejects the one who sent me." Luke 10:16. "Peter... upon this rock..." Mt. 16:18
@dianemontagna "... can only join voices..."? NO! It can and should do much more! A vacuous response that once again calls into question just whose interests this pontificate really serves!
@RaymondArroyo Just the traditional ones.... Notably, the arsonists, like Bergolio, don't seem to target modern, progressive or heterodox ones for destruction....
@EndWokeness The "lie" he was referring to is the notion that the degree will be "useless" if it is used to pursue the vocation of motherhood, rather than a career. The backlash claiming his words are divisive or are telling women that their degree is useless is actually proving his point.
@charliekirk11 The "lie" he was referring to is the notion that the degree will be "useless" if it is used to pursue the vocation of motherhood, rather than a career. The backlash claiming his words are divisive or are telling women that their degree is useless is actually proving his point.
@CollinRugg The "lie" he was referring to is the notion that the degree will be "useless" if it is used to pursue the vocation of motherhood, rather than a career. The backlash claiming his words are divisive or are telling women that their degree is useless is actually proving his point.
@tyromper The "lie" he was referring to is the notion that the degree will be "useless" if it is used to pursue the vocation of motherhood, rather than a career. The backlash claiming his words are divisive or are telling women that their degree is useless is actually proving his point.
@JackPosobiec@RealCandaceO The "lie" he was referring to is the notion that the degree will be "useless" if it is used to pursue the vocation of motherhood, rather than a career. The backlash claiming his words are divisive or are telling women that their degree is useless is actually proving his point.
@Jody_Blues Yes. And how did the Christain Church understand these passages and uniformly teach regarding them for the first 1500 years? You cannot claim the victory of the first 1500 years of Christians but deny their faith. Otherwise you too invent the Church of Jody!
Yes. And how did the Christain Church understand these passages and uniformly teach regarding them for the first 1500 years? You cannot claim the victory of the first 1500 years of Christians but deny their faith. Otherwise you too invent the Church of Jody!
@jessie2013__ Your error and lack of historical context lies in the failure to follow the apostle's admonitions that you are to "firmly hold to the traditions... taught both in word and epistle." (Thes. 2:15). You accept the epistle, but reject the word. You have invented the Church of Scott.
@jessie2013__ Your comments reflect a lack of historical understanding or context of where you even get the Bible. When was it compiled? By whom? On whose authority? Who passed it down before the year 1300? Look far enough into your past...the Bible and your ancestors were Roman Catholic.
@FrMatthewLC Ah, "recent" ... "modernist." There is the rub. Literally, all popes before Francis taught just the opposite. Not even PJII taught it was immoral, but only that it was often immorally applied. 2000 years of teaching not 10. Catholics cannot invent new teaching contra tradition
@realDavidBJr@FrMatthewLC It is the "deposit of faith" handed down by Christ, His apostles, and all popes of 2000 years to which we cling and who unanimously teach we must jeolously guard and strenuously resist those who so willingly and cavalierly abandon sound doctrine for novelties that tickle the ear.