Bill 36 in BC is the nightmare here's why. Doctors and health professionals will be jailed for practicing if they refuse a jab the other countries have stopped pushing because people are dying!! It doesn't stop transmission, so useless. It's a power grab
https://t.co/cwR7pxNPut
2015 Epstein File
“Preparing for Pandemics”
2015 Peace Institute
“Preparing for a Pandemic”
2015 Gates Ted Talk
“We’re going to have a Pandemic”
2019: Planned Pandemic occurs orchestrated by Child Traffickers Bill Gates and Epstein.
Gates meets and is welcomed by all our PM’s
🚨 DR. WILLIAM MAKIS SAYS THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT IVERMECTIN DOSING GRAPH HE'S CREATED.
Not a new chemotherapy drug.
Not a breakthrough immunotherapy.
Not a billion-dollar cancer treatment.
Just one simple dosing strategy.
According to Dr. William Makis, this is the dosing framework he believes everyone researching repurposed medicines for cancer should understand first.
And it all starts with one number.
📌 1 mg/kg/day.
Before explaining why, here's the dosing framework Dr. Makis discusses.
📊 The Four Ivermectin Dosing Ranges
🟢 Low Dose: ≤0.5 mg/kg/day
Used for cancers in remission, strong family history, genetic predisposition, prophylaxis, and lower-dose protocols discussed in published case reports.
🟡 Medium Dose: 1.0 mg/kg/day
Dr. Makis' recommended starting dose for most cancers.
🔵 High Dose: 2.0 mg/kg/day
Discussed for very aggressive cancers, including leukaemia, pancreatic cancer, and some brain cancers.
🔴 Very High Dose: ≥2.5 mg/kg/day
Discussed in selected reported cases involving extensive metastatic disease or extremely poor prognosis, where temporary visual side effects have also been reported.
Now here's why Dr. Makis believes 1 mg/kg/day deserves the most attention.
After reviewing laboratory research, published studies, and numerous case reports, he says this is the starting dose he recommends for most cancers.
According to Dr. Makis, research has investigated Ivermectin across a surprisingly wide range of cancers, including:
• Breast cancer
• Colon cancer
• Lung cancer
• Pancreatic cancer
• Kidney (renal cell) cancer
• Gastric cancer
• Leukemia
One exception stood out.
Lymphoma.
Dr. Makis says he has found very little published research involving Ivermectin and lymphoma.
That doesn't mean it doesn't work.
It simply means the evidence is currently limited.
❓What does 1 mg/kg/day actually look like?
For someone weighing 60 kg (132 lbs)...
That's approximately 60 mg of Ivermectin every day.
Equivalent to:
💊 Five 12 mg tablets
OR
💧 About 6 mL of liquid Ivermectin, roughly one teaspoon.
According to Dr. Makis, that's where he recommends starting for many cancers.
Can lower doses still have an effect?
✅ He believes they can.
Dr. Makis discusses a published ovarian cancer case reported by Dr. Tess Lawrie.
The dosing chart lists the patient as receiving 12 mg of Ivermectin per day. During his discussion, Dr. Makis explains that this was approximately 0.2 mg/kg/day, placing it within the chart's Low Dose (≤0.5 mg/kg/day) range.
📉 According to the case report, the patient's CA125 tumor marker reportedly fell from 288 to 22 after two months.
That case is one reason Dr. Makis believes Ivermectin may have anticancer activity even at lower doses.
However...
He also believes the available evidence suggests the effect is dose dependent.
In other words...
Higher doses may produce greater effects, although more clinical research is needed.
What about the most aggressive cancers?
• Pancreatic cancer
• Leukemia
• Brain cancer
For cancers like these, Dr. Makis discusses doses around 2 mg/kg/day in selected situations.
He notes that Ivermectin crosses the blood-brain barrier, although not very efficiently, which is one reason he says higher doses may be considered for some brain cancers.
He also discusses a case reported by Dr. Allan Landrito.
According to Dr. Makis, a physician with terminal gallbladder cancer reportedly took 2 mg/kg/day for 14 months.
He says her cancer eventually disappeared.
She experienced temporary visual side effects that resolved after a few days.
❓How high have reported doses gone?
According to Dr. Makis, he has seen reported doses as high as 2.5 mg/kg/day.
He references patients treated by Dr. Shankara Chetty who reportedly used those doses without long-term side effects, although some experienced temporary visual disturbances that later resolved.
One point Dr. Makis returns to repeatedly...
Long-term use.
He references the Castro study involving children with leukemia who reportedly received Ivermectin for six months without long-term side effects.
He also discusses anecdotal reports of adults taking it daily for more than a year without long-term toxicity.
So why aren't there larger cancer trials?
Dr. Makis believes one of the biggest obstacles is economics.
Because Ivermectin is an off-patent generic medicine, he argues there is little financial incentive to fund large clinical trials.
Whether future research ultimately confirms or challenges these ideas remains to be seen.
But Dr. Makis' message is remarkably simple.
One graph.
One dosing strategy.
One starting point.
📌 1 mg/kg/day.
Because the conversation isn't just about Ivermectin anymore.
It's about whether repurposed drugs deserve the same level of scientific investigation as newer therapies.
🗨️ Do you think inexpensive repurposed medicines like Ivermectin deserve larger, well-designed clinical trials for cancer?
🔖 Save this post so you'll always have Dr. Makis' dosing framework handy, and repost it to help others discover the ongoing research into repurposed medicines.
#Ivermectin #CancerResearch #RepurposedDrugs #Oncology #CancerCare #MedicalResearch #PancreaticCancer #MakisMD #RxMeds
🚨 “Everything that cancer likes, parasites like. Everything that cancer hates, parasites hate.”
“Everything falls into place when you start looking at it correctly. Antiparasitic drugs treat cancer… because cancer is parasites.”— Dr. Lee Merritt, MDWe get sick from radiation, poison, and parasites. Antiparasitic drugs and herbs are being used worldwide to fight and even reverse all types of cancers. Why? Because many tumors and “cancers” are actually parasitic in nature.
If this were widely known: No one would be pushed into toxic chemotherapy and radiation as the only option.
Oncologists would be trained to look for parasites instead of just “killing all the cells.”
Cheap, natural antiparasitic protocols could be used instead.
Common parasites & the cancers/organs they’re linked to: Schistosomiasis (blood fluke) → bladder
Liver flukes (Opisthorchis & Clonorchis) → liver & bile ducts
Toxoplasmosis → eye tumors, meningioma, leukemia, lymphomas
Cryptosporidium → colorectal
Trichomonas vaginalis → cervix & prostate
Key parts of the protocol: Antiparasitic treatment (drugs + herbs)
Heavy metal detoxification (parasites love toxic hosts)
Eliminate their fuel: sugar. Low-carb / animal-based diet starves them.
The video is powerful. Worth watching.
What are your thoughts on this?
Chemotherapy costs $111,000 a year to destroy the body.
Ivermectin costs a few grand a year to exert 12 anti-cancer mechanisms and NOT destroy the body.
"I'd be called crazy if I took my son to a guy in a white butcher coat & he injects him with Formaldehyde, Antifreeze, Aluminum, Monkey Kidney, Bovine Serum & Human DNA."
"But, somehow magically if it's a 'wellness Doctor visit' for Vaccines it's healthy?...Make it make sense."
We’ve been trying to warn people for years:
Kids Wish Network raised $127M.
They paid solicitors $109M.
HOWEVER, only 2.5% actually reached the sick kids.
Cancer Fund of America: raised over $187 million. Less than 1% went to actual patients in many years. 80+ cents of every dollar went to professional solicitors.
While kids suffered and families went broke chasing “wishes,” the operators got rich.
Follow the money.
🚨 Doctors used to deworm you before treating ANYTHING else.
It was standard practice. Historical medical books were full of powerful deworming remedies because parasites were recognized as a silent killer that stole nutrients, wrecked organs, and destroyed lives for decades.
Today in America? Doctors are barely taught about parasites in medical school. Routine testing is almost nonexistent.
So millions walk around with hidden invaders — tapeworms that can grow over 30 feet long and live 30 years inside your body, flukes that hide for 10–20 years while attacking your liver, lungs, and nervous system.
Most infections go completely unnoticed… until you’re dealing with:
Brain fog & headaches
Anxiety, depression & insomnia
Skin rashes, eczema or psoriasis
Joint pain, teeth grinding, dark circles & anemia
Constant bloating, gut issues & never feeling satisfied after eating
I personally deworm at least 3 times a year using strong herbal tinctures in between — and I make sure to get regular sun exposure. The symptoms you’ve been told are “just stress” or “aging” might actually be parasites quietly draining you.
If 3 or more of these hit home… you’re not crazy. Drop a comment.
America's most influential pediatric vaccine organization has been hit with a federal RICO lawsuit for operating a vaccine racketeering enterprise.
The American Academy of Pediatrics unlawfully deceived parents into injecting their children with large batteries of untested vaccines by issuing FRAUDULENT vaccine recommendations.
The AAP rakes in cash from Merck, Pfizer, and Moderna to push maximal vaccination for maximum profit, despite NO safety data on injecting 72 doses by age 18.
Even worse, NONE of the routine childhood vaccines were licensed based on a long-term, placebo-controlled trial.
To find a hidden tumour, they inject you with radioactive sugar and photograph where it goes.
It works, reliably, because the cancer drinks that glucose so greedily it flares up on the scan like a bonfire while the healthy tissue around it sits dark. The entire technology rests on one fact nobody says out loud in the room: the tumour runs on sugar, and it will outbid the rest of your body for every last gram of it.
We have known about this appetite for the better part of a century. We built a vast imaging industry on the back of it. We use it today, in every major hospital, to hunt the disease down.
Then, having located the cancer by following the sugar, they bring round the lunch trolley. White toast. Tinned fruit in syrup. A carton of juice, a biscuit, and a leaflet recommending plenty of wholesome carbohydrates to keep your strength up.
We spend a fortune using sugar to find the thing.
Then we sit the patient down and feed it.
Read that twice.