@__scottsaunders Don't disagree although 8 is a lot. If he wanted us over everybody else there might have been hope and worth going after but it's heading in the opposite direction unfortunately.
@iamgaurav_92@__scottsaunders I get that but that fee was 3 years ago. Look I totally see the reasons for not going in for him at that price and he seems to want city anyway.
@__scottsaunders If he could be that transformative signing we wouldn't be thinking about the fee in a year's time. I'm not sure any of the other names we're linked with would be that level. Good, yes but transformative nah. Fernandes excites me though.
@AdamJoseph So effectively we are gambling on Ederson if he's being branded as #3. Ugarte replacement is what I'm seeing. I'd rather go all out on a #1 and see what's left in the kitty. If Fernandes is then doable leave it at that