Polymathic Being

Perpetually exploring counter intuitive insights from technology, innovation, philosophy, psychology, and more

[Polymathic Being @PolymathicBeing]

@MichaelGLFlood Ah yes, women have no agency. I fully understand your misogyny. I've seen it before.

[Polymathic Being @PolymathicBeing]

The good professor doesn't think women have agency. That's quite the misogynistic take. I don't agree.

[Professor Michael Flood @MichaelGLFlood]

@PolymathicBeing All this statistic means (if it’s true) is that we live in a society that eroticizes male dominance and women can internalize that and fantasize about it under conditions where they do have control (their own mind). It doesn't mean that women secretly desire sexual violence.
1/2

[Polymathic Being @PolymathicBeing]

@MichaelGLFlood Yes yes, I know you think women have no agency. However, I'm not a misogynist like you and I think they can have these ideas on their own.

[Polymathic Being @PolymathicBeing]

@sxhealth101 Sisters, listen up, the written erotica you love does the same thing!
https://t.co/SIBB19Picc

[Polymathic Being @PolymathicBeing]

Written porn, the OG porn, is just as bad. Did you know 60% of women fantasize about rape, largely because of their consumption of erotica? More on that here: https://t.co/SIBB19Picc

[Abby ♱🇻🇦 @CristeraAbigail]

La première nation occidentale à INTERDIRE LA PORNOGRAPHIE deviendra rapidement la nation la plus productive de la planète.

Cela résoudrait la crise du déclin démographique du jour au lendemain.

Cela sauverait des millions de mariages.
Cela sauverait des millions d’enfants de voir leur innocence arrachée.
Cela forcerait les hommes à se bouger et à faire le travail de courtiser une femme.
Cela sauverait des millions de femmes d’être exploitées et trafiquées.
Il n’y a littéralement aucun inconvénient à interdire la pornographie.

La pornographie est un pur poison civilisationnel.
Nous pouvons l’interdire.
Et, par Dieu, nous le ferons.

[Polymathic Being @PolymathicBeing]

@CristeraAbigail Written porn is equally bad.
https://t.co/SIBB19Picc

[Polymathic Being @PolymathicBeing]

@JeanGen09181213 Written porn, ie erotica, is just as bad.
https://t.co/SIBB19Picc

[Polymathic Being @PolymathicBeing]

@Art444Star Written porn is just as bad.
https://t.co/SIBB19Picc

[Polymathic Being @PolymathicBeing]

@harmaceutics @nicklandack The proper comparison is written erotica: the OG Porn
https://t.co/SIBB19Picc

[Polymathic Being @PolymathicBeing]

@Globalstats11 60% of women fantasize about rape... that's an odd one driven by their consumption of errotica.
https://t.co/SIBB19Picc

[Polymathic Being @PolymathicBeing]

@DearS_o_n Written erotica / written porn, is the same for women.
https://t.co/SIBB19Picc

[Polymathic Being @PolymathicBeing]

@globalconfy Written porn too, which is funny because there's actually errotica about jesus filling that 'void'. It's just as bad as visual.
https://t.co/SIBB19Picc

[Polymathic Being @PolymathicBeing]

@prolifefrenchie Both written and visual.
https://t.co/SIBB19Picc

[Polymathic Being @PolymathicBeing]

@Sheilah_Love Both the written and the visual porn.
https://t.co/SIBB19Picc

[Polymathic Being @PolymathicBeing]

@manly_mentor Don't read porn either, girls, it sets you up for failure too.

https://t.co/SIBB19Picc

[Polymathic Being @PolymathicBeing]

Written Erotica = Porn and leads to a lot of behaviors women say they don't like. This article rips the covers off and exposes what our prudish society wants to hide.
https://t.co/SIBB19Picc

[Polymathic Being @PolymathicBeing]

I'm actually a climate change advocate so.... The solution is adaptation, which oddly, climate alarmists are incapable of. More on the idea here:
https://t.co/Ln4utRlG3p

[Climate Warrior🐬 #ClimateJustice🇵🇸🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @ClimateWarrior7]

Climate change deniers: if you refuse to believe in climate change, what is YOUR solution for preventing heatwaves and earthquakes???

[Polymathic Being @PolymathicBeing]

@ClimateWarrior7 I'm actually a climate change advocate, so.... The solution is adaptation, which, oddly, climate alarmists are incapable of.
https://t.co/Ln4utRlG3p

[J.K. Lundblad @JK_Lundblad]

This is a great piece from @PolymathicBeing and wasn’t what I expected.

It is quite interesting how Dunbar’s Number limits the types of organizational structures that can exist above the ~150-person threshold.

Early hunter-gatherer societies, for example, were led by elders, which made sense. If someone lived long enough to become the “elder” in those days, they were probably worth listening to (and imitating).

But as the population grew, those social bonds weakened, necessitating new kinds of government. The simplest, of course, is monarchy, with some kind of “divine right” or “mandate of heaven” justification for the right to rule.

Contrary to popular belief today, monarchies were a very effective form of government at the time. Sure, not ideal today, but they provided:

1) A clear system for a stable transition of power

2) Some semblance of order (even tyranny tends to be better than anarchy) and

3) Royals tended to educate their young and seek out expert advice, making them comparatively effective leaders.