PONSARMY

PONS believer 🟢
Supporting the vision. Building the family.
$PONS 🏠💚

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

👀 I found something interesting… @theunipcs

One of the biggest wallets in the ecosystem — Unipcs — is holding 24.88 MILLION $BRODIE, making the wallet one of the TOP holders.

A $2M+ wallet.
24.88M BRODIE.
Sitting near the top of the holder list.

Big wallets don’t need to tweet.

Sometimes you just have to watch where they’re positioned. 🐶🟢

$BRODIE — Robinhood Dog.

Are you paying attention yet? 👀

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

@hamouddi v2 is live now. There's a new contract now.

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

Some people are claiming their $BRODIE V2 and immediately selling for a small profit.

I understand why.

Fresh migration.
Tokens are vesting.
People expect unlock pressure.

But before selling the whole bag, I think it’s worth understanding what actually changed between BRODIE V1 and V2.

The old BRODIE reached roughly a $7M–$8M valuation at its peak.

And it did that with a structure that was objectively weaker than what exists today.

Now look at V2.

BRODIE launched its new pool with roughly $500K+ of liquidity, and within the first hours we already saw liquidity move above $600K while hundreds of thousands of dollars of volume traded through the pool.

That matters.

A deeper pool means every buyer and seller has less impact on price than they would in a thin pool. More importantly, the Pons migration mechanism is designed so that recovered ETH from the old market seeds the replacement pool, and later epochs add additional depth to that same pool.

So migration isn’t simply:

“more tokens unlock → price goes down.”

There is another side to the equation:

tokens vest → sellers arrive → but liquidity can deepen and new buyers can absorb them.

And the architecture itself is different now.

Under Pons V2, graduated liquidity is permanently locked. The creator or CTO cannot withdraw it. They cannot mint more tokens, blacklist wallets, change the pair or suddenly add a new tax.

Then there is the fee system.

A V2 creator can enable market buybacks funded from the creator’s own fee share. Those bought-back tokens are not dumped back into the market — they are locked and released gradually over five years.

And a CTO does not get control over the liquidity or token contract. It only redirects the creator-side economics — fees and the creator’s share of those buybacks — to the community operator.

Meanwhile the wider Pons ecosystem has its own flywheel: 80% of Pons protocol fees are currently used for PONS buyback & burn, according to the official docs. More ecosystem volume therefore feeds the protocol itself.

Think about the contrast.

V1 BRODIE managed to touch roughly $7M–$8M territory.

Today we have:

• a fresh V2 contract
• much deeper seeded liquidity
• permanently locked liquidity
• a CTO structure
• migration liquidity being consolidated into one new pool
• optional recurring BRODIE buybacks with 5-year locks
• and BRODIE sitting inside a Pons ecosystem whose own revenue is tied to buyback-and-burn economics

Yet some people may be selling the first tiny pieces of their vesting because they assume everyone else will do the same.

Maybe that trade works.

Maybe there is a migration dump.

But what if the market absorbs the vesting?

What if liquidity keeps growing?

What if the community eventually enables and funds consistent buybacks?

And what happens if a BRODIE that once reached ~$7M–$8M under the old structure eventually revisits those levels with a materially stronger market structure?

That’s the part I think people are overlooking.

Sometimes the most expensive tokens you ever sell are the tiny ones you sold because they finally turned green.

V2 isn’t just a new contract.
It’s a different economic structure.

$BRODIE 🐶🌱
#RobinhoodChain #PONS

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

Captain $Brodie is ready for takeoff. 🐶✈️

Destination: Robinhood Chain. 🏹💚

Co-pilot $HMM has been studying the map for 20 minutes…

Brodie: “Are we good?”

$HMM: “Hmm…” 🤔🐱

Brodie: “Good enough.” 😂

Fasten your seatbelts.
$BRODIE is flying. 🎾✈️ @theunipcs @CryptoKaleo @MEADGod

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

@alpinoWolf @watchingmarkets V2 now

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

🐶 Why is $BRODIE V1 dropping during migration — and does that automatically mean V2 launches lower? Not necessarily.

The migration mechanics are easy to misunderstand, so here’s a simple example.

Imagine BRODIE V1 is trading around a $10M market cap when migration begins.

Pons captures a reference price around that stage.

Then hundreds of millions of V1 BRODIE are deposited for migration.

Those deposited V1 tokens are later sold back into the old V1 pool in controlled batches to recover ETH for the new V2 pool.

Naturally, that creates sell pressure.

So the old V1 market could move like this:

$10M → $8M → $6M → $5M

A lot of people then look at the chart and think:

“BRODIE dropped 50%, so V2 must also launch 50% lower.”

But that’s not how the migration is designed.

The fresh V2 pool is not simply based on the final depressed V1 price after all that migration selling.

The key concept is the captured price.

The new pool is seeded using the ETH recovered from the old pool, while referencing the price captured before the migration selling distorted the old market.

Here’s another simple example:

Let’s say the captured BRODIE price is $0.01.

After migration selling starts, V1 falls to $0.005.

That does NOT automatically mean V2 must open at $0.005.

Instead, what really matters is:

How much ETH was recovered from the old pool?

Example:

If the system recovers $500K worth of ETH, that recovered ETH becomes the base liquidity for the new V2 pool.

If it recovers $1M, the pool can be deeper.

If it recovers $2M, the pool can be deeper again.

So the amount of recovered ETH is extremely important because it affects how strong the new pool is and how much buying/selling it can absorb.

This is the part people should understand:

V1 price action during migration and V2 opening liquidity are related — but they are NOT the same thing.

The old V1 chart can look terrible because migration itself is creating sell pressure.

Meanwhile, migrated users receive V2 credit according to the epoch rate they entered at.

For example:

Epoch 1: 100 V1 → 100 V2 credit

Epoch 2: 100 V1 → 80 V2 credit

Epoch 3: 100 V1 → 60 V2 credit

So if someone migrated during Epoch 1, their credit does not suddenly become 50% smaller just because the old V1 chart dropped later.

What I’m watching now is NOT just the V1 candle.

I’m watching:

1. How much ETH gets recovered
2. How deep the new V2 pool will be
3. What the actual V2 opening price is
4. How much liquidity the pool can handle without major slippage

That’s the real migration story.

Looking only at the falling V1 chart can give a very incomplete picture.
I hope I've explained it correctly, my friend? @MEADGod @theunipcs
🐶 $BRODIE
#PonsV2 #RobinhoodChain #BRODIE

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

$Brodie didn’t throw the old ball away.

He planted it. 🎾🌱

And look what grew. 🐶💚

V2 was never supposed to erase the past.
It was about taking what survived… and giving it room to grow.

Liquidity.
Burns.
Growth.
Community.

And most importantly:

putting the harvest back into the village.

Same dog. New soil. 🌳

Now let’s see how big this tree can grow.
Ca: 0x737054bd706cba68eaF4661411FeDE5F6C2952e5

$BRODIE 🐾🏹 @theunipcs @MEADGod @PonsEcosystem @BrodieHasFun

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

@gg_uniteTh @BrodieHasFun

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

@flnsax I agree. Let's not forget that everything was done by the pons team.

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

@Yinkusberry @Deniyt6wp There's no problem, it's entirely up to you. Since it comes linearly, you can claim it whenever you want.

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

@tonjkb @sickpuppy33 👇

[BRODIE @BrodieHasFun]

MIGRATION UPDATE: 🌟

All users migrating between epoch 2 & 3 will be allocated with 100% of tokens through airdrop bought back with team fees.

The team made a crucial mistake in not giving a prior announcement & rushing our epoch process.

We wanted to stop the epoch 1 process to allocate for 80% instead of the original 30%, but unfortunately it was too late to stop the contract and had to continue with migration to V2

If you are migrating between epoch 2 & 3, DO NOT worry about the tax as you will be reimbursed and made whole.

We apologize for this mistake and feel as if this is the only way to make our community whole. ❤️

God speed brodies 🫶🏼🙏🏼🐕

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

It depends on which epoch you migrated in. Once your epoch settles, your credited V2 $BRODIE starts vesting linearly over 3 days.

Epoch 1 is already vesting now. If you deposited in a later epoch, you’ll need to wait for that specific epoch to settle first. 🐶🌱

You can track everything directly on the Pons migration page.

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

Yesterday, we migrated the contract.

Today, we build the story. 🐶💚

$Brodie didn’t leave his past behind.
He survived it.

V1 gave us the scars, the lessons, and the community that refused to disappear.

Now the door is open.

Same Brodie.
Same ball. 🎾
New playground.
New engine.
New chapter.

Welcome to $BRODIE V2. 🏹🐾

Now let’s see what this little dog can build.

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

Epoch 2 needs to settle first, bro. Once it settles, your credited V2 BRODIE should start vesting linearly over 3 days, just like Epoch 1 is doing now. 🐶🌱

So don’t worry — if your Epoch 2 deposit was successfully confirmed, your credit is locked at the 80% rate. Just keep checking the migration page. $BRODIE

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

@Lintrouvable13 @MEXC You should contact the stock exchange.
@Alpha_MEXC

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

🐶 Why is $BRODIE V1 dropping during migration — and does that automatically mean V2 launches lower? Not necessarily.

The migration mechanics are easy to misunderstand, so here’s a simple example.

Imagine BRODIE V1 is trading around a $10M market cap when migration begins.

Pons captures a reference price around that stage.

Then hundreds of millions of V1 BRODIE are deposited for migration.

Those deposited V1 tokens are later sold back into the old V1 pool in controlled batches to recover ETH for the new V2 pool.

Naturally, that creates sell pressure.

So the old V1 market could move like this:

$10M → $8M → $6M → $5M

A lot of people then look at the chart and think:

“BRODIE dropped 50%, so V2 must also launch 50% lower.”

But that’s not how the migration is designed.

The fresh V2 pool is not simply based on the final depressed V1 price after all that migration selling.

The key concept is the captured price.

The new pool is seeded using the ETH recovered from the old pool, while referencing the price captured before the migration selling distorted the old market.

Here’s another simple example:

Let’s say the captured BRODIE price is $0.01.

After migration selling starts, V1 falls to $0.005.

That does NOT automatically mean V2 must open at $0.005.

Instead, what really matters is:

How much ETH was recovered from the old pool?

Example:

If the system recovers $500K worth of ETH, that recovered ETH becomes the base liquidity for the new V2 pool.

If it recovers $1M, the pool can be deeper.

If it recovers $2M, the pool can be deeper again.

So the amount of recovered ETH is extremely important because it affects how strong the new pool is and how much buying/selling it can absorb.

This is the part people should understand:

V1 price action during migration and V2 opening liquidity are related — but they are NOT the same thing.

The old V1 chart can look terrible because migration itself is creating sell pressure.

Meanwhile, migrated users receive V2 credit according to the epoch rate they entered at.

For example:

Epoch 1: 100 V1 → 100 V2 credit

Epoch 2: 100 V1 → 80 V2 credit

Epoch 3: 100 V1 → 60 V2 credit

So if someone migrated during Epoch 1, their credit does not suddenly become 50% smaller just because the old V1 chart dropped later.

What I’m watching now is NOT just the V1 candle.

I’m watching:

1. How much ETH gets recovered
2. How deep the new V2 pool will be
3. What the actual V2 opening price is
4. How much liquidity the pool can handle without major slippage

That’s the real migration story.

Looking only at the falling V1 chart can give a very incomplete picture.
I hope I've explained it correctly, my friend? @MEADGod @theunipcs
🐶 $BRODIE
#PonsV2 #RobinhoodChain #BRODIE

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

Look closely at these numbers. 👀

$HMM : $19.2M MC — $732K liquidity
$BRODIE: ~$3.76M 1B-supply equivalent — $609K liquidity

BRODIE is only ~5 hours into V2.

And that $410K displayed MC is misleading while migration/claim minting is still unfolding — the tracker is currently seeing only ~109M tokens.

The part that interests me isn’t the displayed MC.

It’s the liquidity.

BRODIE already has liquidity approaching a token trading near $20M — while V2 migration is still settling.

People are selling their first vested tokens for profit.
Maybe they’re right.

But I’d be very careful assuming that today’s tiny circulating supply tells the whole story.

$609K liquidity this early deserves attention. 🐶🌱

$BRODIE #PONS #RobinhoodChain @MEADGod @CryptoKaleo @theunipcs

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

If your transaction did not complete during the 80% epoch and you only successfully deposited during the 20% epoch, then as far as I understand, your credit should be based on the epoch in which the deposit was actually confirmed on-chain — so 20%.

The important thing is not when you tried to migrate, but when the deposit was successfully recorded.

I would check your wallet on the migration page under “Your deposit” and “Your credit.” That should show exactly how many V2 BRODIE you are entitled to.

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

@MEADGod 🙏🐶

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

@Jorgegarduno15 You need to try other methods. :(

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

👀 Now we can actually see what’s happening with the $BRODIE migration on-chain.

The migration contract is currently holding:

67.54 WETH ≈ $164,500
445.76M V1 BRODIE still waiting to be processed

We also verified individual batches: V1 BRODIE is being sold into the old pool and the recovered WETH is going directly back to the migration contract.

So that scary V1 sell pressure isn’t the whole story.

ETH is being recovered to seed the new V2 pool.

And the process clearly isn’t finished yet. 👀

Now the number I’m watching is simple:

How much WETH will be recovered when settlement is complete?

That number could tell us a LOT about the strength of the V2 launch. 🐶🔥

$BRODIE #RobinhoodChain

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

@BitStern 👇👇

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

🐶 Why is $BRODIE V1 dropping during migration — and does that automatically mean V2 launches lower? Not necessarily.

The migration mechanics are easy to misunderstand, so here’s a simple example.

Imagine BRODIE V1 is trading around a $10M market cap when migration begins.

Pons captures a reference price around that stage.

Then hundreds of millions of V1 BRODIE are deposited for migration.

Those deposited V1 tokens are later sold back into the old V1 pool in controlled batches to recover ETH for the new V2 pool.

Naturally, that creates sell pressure.

So the old V1 market could move like this:

$10M → $8M → $6M → $5M

A lot of people then look at the chart and think:

“BRODIE dropped 50%, so V2 must also launch 50% lower.”

But that’s not how the migration is designed.

The fresh V2 pool is not simply based on the final depressed V1 price after all that migration selling.

The key concept is the captured price.

The new pool is seeded using the ETH recovered from the old pool, while referencing the price captured before the migration selling distorted the old market.

Here’s another simple example:

Let’s say the captured BRODIE price is $0.01.

After migration selling starts, V1 falls to $0.005.

That does NOT automatically mean V2 must open at $0.005.

Instead, what really matters is:

How much ETH was recovered from the old pool?

Example:

If the system recovers $500K worth of ETH, that recovered ETH becomes the base liquidity for the new V2 pool.

If it recovers $1M, the pool can be deeper.

If it recovers $2M, the pool can be deeper again.

So the amount of recovered ETH is extremely important because it affects how strong the new pool is and how much buying/selling it can absorb.

This is the part people should understand:

V1 price action during migration and V2 opening liquidity are related — but they are NOT the same thing.

The old V1 chart can look terrible because migration itself is creating sell pressure.

Meanwhile, migrated users receive V2 credit according to the epoch rate they entered at.

For example:

Epoch 1: 100 V1 → 100 V2 credit

Epoch 2: 100 V1 → 80 V2 credit

Epoch 3: 100 V1 → 60 V2 credit

So if someone migrated during Epoch 1, their credit does not suddenly become 50% smaller just because the old V1 chart dropped later.

What I’m watching now is NOT just the V1 candle.

I’m watching:

1. How much ETH gets recovered
2. How deep the new V2 pool will be
3. What the actual V2 opening price is
4. How much liquidity the pool can handle without major slippage

That’s the real migration story.

Looking only at the falling V1 chart can give a very incomplete picture.
I hope I've explained it correctly, my friend? @MEADGod @theunipcs
🐶 $BRODIE
#PonsV2 #RobinhoodChain #BRODIE

[PONSARMY @ponsARMY1]

People aren't aware 😂 of this for $BRODIE. A very large and substantial amount of liquidity is coming. The problem here is that those using the FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) feature apparently couldn't migrate, and when they couldn't, they sold and moved to other wallets, or couldn't acquire any. They also faced selling pressure. The team has said they will airdrop the remaining amount. According to my calculations, the gap created by those who participated in rounds 2 and 3 is 140 million $BRODIE. If they buy that with the revenue and distribute it, it will seriously be a bull run...