#NaneNane PROTESTS is weird, and I don't mean the association of 88 with the Neo-NAZI & Hitler LOVERS.
There are rumors that Jimi Wanjigi is Financing these PROTESTS to UNSEAT Ruto. This means that the #RutoMustGo PROTESTS have been HIJACKED & are CONTROLLED by selfish interests
As Herbert Marcuse & the Frankfurt School said, REVOLUTIONARIES must be INTOLERANT for the REVOLUTION to SUCCEED.
Kenyan REVOLUTIONARIES must:
- Be INTOLERANT
- Be DISRESPECTFUL to anti-revolutionaries. They should INSULT, DEMEAN, & CANCEL them
- Be FOCUSED & OPPOSE any DIALOGUE
These CRIMES by DCI call into question the second paragraph of this DCI press release:
https://t.co/4SSHdLAac6
"The DCI categorically states that it does not sanction, facilitate, conceal, or participate in criminal conduct of any kind, regardless of the identity or status of any person involved. The DCI remains a professional investigative agency mandated by law to investigate serious and complex crimes, gather evidence, and present cases to the relevant prosecutorial and judicial authorities. Its officers continue to discharge these responsibilities strictly in accordance with the Constitution, relevant laws, and established investigative procedures".
About COMPLEX CRIMES, DCI is invited along with the @ODPP_KE to investigate and PROSECUTE named SENIOR MANAGERS of @imbankke.
Why Kagirison Research Demands the CRIMINAL Indictment, PROSECUTION, and Subsequent CONVICTION of I&M Bank’s CEO and Senior Managers
https://t.co/sv1jDTHSlF
https://t.co/p6KwlbwUnA
The Exo-Observer Diagnostic is a way of stepping outside a debate and asking a simpler question than ��Who is right?” It asks: How does the system behave when certain questions are raised? Instead of focusing on the claims themselves, it looks at the responses surrounding them. In healthy inquiry, challenging ideas provoke explanation, counterevidence, or revision. In unhealthy systems, they provoke something else: silence, ridicule, moral condemnation, appeals to authority, or sudden shifts in topic. These reactions are not random. They function as signals that the question has touched something costly to acknowledge.
@CMAKenya Do you investigate regulatory complaints, or even acknowledge them? Why not learn from @SECGov which acknowledges complaints? Some of the complaints sent to CMA are described here:
https://t.co/jlFDXJ0tow
Inside the I&M Bank Legal Storm: How a Lawsuit Escalated Into Multiple Complaints, Criminal Allegations, and Warrant Involvement of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions - Days After the DPP Sought Prosecution of 3 Bank CEOs
https://t.co/hrYZDkQi5i
@DCI_Kenya So, @Rigathi was right, even naming that that the 3 Killer Policemen were KALENJIN, and they are:
- Inspector Kenneth Kipkemboi Sang.
- PC Elijah Kibelion Kimoi
- PC Collins Bett Kiplangat.
@DCI_Kenya So, @Rigathi was right, even naming that that the 3 Killer Policemen were KALENJIN, and they are:
- Inspector Kenneth Kipkemboi Sang.
- PC Elijah Kibelion Kimoi
- PC Collins Bett Kiplangat.
Why @Vodafone should NOT allow Ndegwa to continue as CEO of @SafaricomPLC. From Rigathi-linked SUPPLY CHAIN FRAUD to INTERNATIONAL CRIMES involving #Safaricom executives and managers.
https://t.co/KvgnTRVE82
The latest affidavit filed on behalf of I&M Bank (@imbankke) is sworn NOT by a company officer, but by the Plaintiff's advocate on record from @WamaeAllen. This is the third different deponent to swear affidavits on behalf of the Plaintiff during the course of these proceedings.
I&M Bank's Further Affidavit contained statements regarding the Court's orders and directions that I was unable to reconcile with the court documents available to me. Those apparent inconsistencies prompted me to request an administrative inquiry from the Office of the Judiciary Ombudsman (under @Kenyajudiciary) concerning the completeness, accuracy and consistency of the court record.
The quoted post has DISTRESSED I&M Bank (@imbankke).
The latest development is that I&M Bank has instructed its Senior Manager in the Legal Department, ANDREW MUCHINA, to SWEAR FALSE STATEMENTS, while @WamaeAllen has SUBORNED those statements in an effort to provide FALSE INFORMATION to the judiciary and secure yet another EX PARTE ORDER.
In this lawsuit, which commenced in late July 2025, there are ZERO PERFECTED COURT ORDERS (documents). Instead, there are only COURT DIRECTIONS granting EX PARTE ORDERS whose terms depend on reference to extraneous documents. There is also the unresolved issue of whether I&M Bank's Deponent actually signed the Affidavit that was presented to Hon. A. Nyoike (SPM), who subsequently issued the EX PARTE ORDERS.
Both I&M Bank and Wamae & Allen LLP are relying EXCLUSIVELY on EX PARTE ORDERS that are being issued as MANDATORY INJUNCTIONS. The latest of these consists of STATUTORILY VIOLATING ex parte orders that are DEFECTIVE on their FACE.
In my Replying Affidavit, I stated as follows:
"The Defendant respectfully states that he is unable to comprehend why mandatory injunctive relief has repeatedly been granted on an ex parte basis without the subsequent extraction, issuance, and formalization of the corresponding Court Orders. In the Defendant's respectful view, the absence of formally extracted Orders creates uncertainty as to the precise terms and legal effect of the directions issued by this Honourable Court.
(1) The Defendant further states that the continued issuance of ex parte mandatory injunctive relief, without the prompt formalization of the Court's determinations, carries the real risk of inflicting irreversible prejudice upon a party before that party has been afforded an opportunity to be heard. The Defendant contends that such a process may, in practical effect, result in the grant of final relief through interlocutory proceedings, a phenomenon commonly referred to as 'DEATH BY INJUNCTION' (emphasis mine here).
(2) The Defendant further states that concerns regarding the improper or disproportionate use of ex parte mandatory injunctive relief have previously been considered and deprecated by the Judicial Service Commission, and respectfully invites this Honourable Court to have regard to those concerns in determining the present application."
As the Judicial Service Commission (@jsckenya) observed in its ruling dismissing Magistrate Isaac Karasi Orenge for gross misconduct arising from his conduct in Milimani Commercial Suit CMCC No. 1111 of 2018:
"The ex parte nature of the orders, coupled with their finality, magnified the injustice caused," and further emphasized that "This not only breached the principles of natural justice but also denied the affected party an opportunity to be heard."
SOURCE: https://t.co/AefymALyUf
With respect to Andrew Muchina, no board resolution has, to date, been produced demonstrating that he is authorized to swear affidavits on behalf of I&M Bank. The Company's Secretary, Stella Gacharia, may be able to clarify that issue.
The concern regarding the OBTAINING OF COURT ORDERS BY FALSE PRETENSES by I&M Bank - potentially as a SHIELD in its regulatory interactions with bodies such as @CMAKenya, @CBKKenya, and @NSE_PLC - may warrant referral of these matters to the High Court of @Kenyajudiciary and the Judicial Service Commission (@jsckenya).
As this litigation progresses, the issues arising are expected to result in referrals to the:
- Disciplinary Committee of the Law Society of Kenya (@LawSocietyofKe).
- Judicial Service Commission.
- Director of Public Prosecutions (@ODPP_KE).
BREAKING: A source close to Iranian officials says Tehran has documented a pattern of oil market manipulation tied to Axios reports and Trump administration insiders, including evidence of a $9 billion insider trading operation linked to Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff.
Some of the documented timeline from the $9 billion insider profit:
Between April and May 2026, a series of suspiciously timed trades in oil futures markets preceded major Iran war announcements—each tied to reporting by Axios.
On March 23, approximately $500–580 million in shorts were placed 15 minutes before Trump announced he was postponing strikes on Iran. Oil dropped.
On April 7, roughly $950–960 million in shorts were placed hours before Trump announced a two-week ceasefire with Iran. Oil fell around 15 percent.
On April 17, around $760 million in shorts were placed 20 minutes before Iran's foreign minister announced the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. Oil dropped.
On April 21, approximately $430 million in shorts were placed 15 minutes before Trump extended the ceasefire. Oil dropped again.
On May 6, nearly $920 million to $1.7 billion in crude oil shorts were placed approximately 70 minutes before an Axios scoop claimed the U.S. and Iran were near a "14-point agreement." Oil dropped 12 percent. Traders made an estimated $125 million. Iran called the report "the Americans' wish list."
Previously, a senior Iranian official told investigative outlet Drop Site News that Tehran privately warned JD Vance during Switzerland talks that Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff were "abusing" negotiations—"more interested in exploiting insider knowledge to profit in financial markets than reaching a deal."
An open letter is necessary to put @Vodacom and @Vodafone on NOTICE about the CRIMES and LEGAL RISKS posed by the actions of EXECUTIVES and MANAGERS of @SafaricomPLC. For instance, Safaricom lost custody of 43 MILLION CUSTOMER RECORDS, and Safaricom's managers ILLICITLY EXPLOITED @Amazon's @AWSCloud resources!!!
https://t.co/GSdKH529d5
The quoted post has DISTRESSED I&M Bank (@imbankke).
The latest development is that I&M Bank has instructed its Senior Manager in the Legal Department, ANDREW MUCHINA, to SWEAR FALSE STATEMENTS, while @WamaeAllen has SUBORNED those statements in an effort to provide FALSE INFORMATION to the judiciary and secure yet another EX PARTE ORDER.
In this lawsuit, which commenced in late July 2025, there are ZERO PERFECTED COURT ORDERS (documents). Instead, there are only COURT DIRECTIONS granting EX PARTE ORDERS whose terms depend on reference to extraneous documents. There is also the unresolved issue of whether I&M Bank's Deponent actually signed the Affidavit that was presented to Hon. A. Nyoike (SPM), who subsequently issued the EX PARTE ORDERS.
Both I&M Bank and Wamae & Allen LLP are relying EXCLUSIVELY on EX PARTE ORDERS that are being issued as MANDATORY INJUNCTIONS. The latest of these consists of STATUTORILY VIOLATING ex parte orders that are DEFECTIVE on their FACE.
In my Replying Affidavit, I stated as follows:
"The Defendant respectfully states that he is unable to comprehend why mandatory injunctive relief has repeatedly been granted on an ex parte basis without the subsequent extraction, issuance, and formalization of the corresponding Court Orders. In the Defendant's respectful view, the absence of formally extracted Orders creates uncertainty as to the precise terms and legal effect of the directions issued by this Honourable Court.
(1) The Defendant further states that the continued issuance of ex parte mandatory injunctive relief, without the prompt formalization of the Court's determinations, carries the real risk of inflicting irreversible prejudice upon a party before that party has been afforded an opportunity to be heard. The Defendant contends that such a process may, in practical effect, result in the grant of final relief through interlocutory proceedings, a phenomenon commonly referred to as 'DEATH BY INJUNCTION' (emphasis mine here).
(2) The Defendant further states that concerns regarding the improper or disproportionate use of ex parte mandatory injunctive relief have previously been considered and deprecated by the Judicial Service Commission, and respectfully invites this Honourable Court to have regard to those concerns in determining the present application."
As the Judicial Service Commission (@jsckenya) observed in its ruling dismissing Magistrate Isaac Karasi Orenge for gross misconduct arising from his conduct in Milimani Commercial Suit CMCC No. 1111 of 2018:
"The ex parte nature of the orders, coupled with their finality, magnified the injustice caused," and further emphasized that "This not only breached the principles of natural justice but also denied the affected party an opportunity to be heard."
SOURCE: https://t.co/AefymALyUf
With respect to Andrew Muchina, no board resolution has, to date, been produced demonstrating that he is authorized to swear affidavits on behalf of I&M Bank. The Company's Secretary, Stella Gacharia, may be able to clarify that issue.
The concern regarding the OBTAINING OF COURT ORDERS BY FALSE PRETENSES by I&M Bank - potentially as a SHIELD in its regulatory interactions with bodies such as @CMAKenya, @CBKKenya, and @NSE_PLC - may warrant referral of these matters to the High Court of @Kenyajudiciary and the Judicial Service Commission (@jsckenya).
As this litigation progresses, the issues arising are expected to result in referrals to the:
- Disciplinary Committee of the Law Society of Kenya (@LawSocietyofKe).
- Judicial Service Commission.
- Director of Public Prosecutions (@ODPP_KE).
Why @Vodafone should NOT allow Ndegwa to continue as CEO of @SafaricomPLC. From Rigathi-linked SUPPLY CHAIN FRAUD to INTERNATIONAL CRIMES involving #Safaricom executives and managers.
https://t.co/KvgnTRVE82
Why @Vodafone should NOT allow Ndegwa to continue as CEO of @SafaricomPLC. From Rigathi-linked SUPPLY CHAIN FRAUD to INTERNATIONAL CRIMES involving #Safaricom executives and managers.
https://t.co/KvgnTRVE82
On 31st July 2026 at 5:17 PM (Early Evening), I&M Bank (@imbankke), through @WamaeAllen, filed an Affidavit of Service relating to the Application they filed in Court on 6th July 2026, obtained Court Directions on 14th July 2026, and purport to have served me on 29th July 2026 at 4:43 PM, after receiving complaints about want of service.
The Affidavit, as filed, appears on its face to CONTRAVENE the evidential requirements under Order 5 Rule 22B(2).
On 31st July 2026 at 5:17 PM (Early Evening), I&M Bank (@imbankke), through @WamaeAllen, filed an Affidavit of Service relating to the Application they filed in Court on 6th July 2026, obtained Court Directions on 14th July 2026, and purport to have served me on 29th July 2026 at 4:43 PM, after receiving complaints about want of service.
The Affidavit, as filed, appears on its face to CONTRAVENE the evidential requirements under Order 5 Rule 22B(2).