Bookmark this.
Keep this.
Remember this.
Watch it often.
Memorize it.
Learn it.
Understand it.
Grasp it. Believe it. And never forget it. Ever.
🚨 The War Waged by NEOCONS Via Ukraine Was Designed to Bring Down Russia
The Ukraine - Russian War Was Provoked!
If you still believe that Russia started this conflict in 2022, then you are either corrupt, ignorant, or brainwashed.
NATO DISBAND !!!
Putin says the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies.
▶NATO has been encircling Russia since the nineties.
▶NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence.
▶ NATO has never defended anyone, but only attacked.
▶NATO is a military Alliance that feeds on war.
▶To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts.
▶The purpose of the NATO alliance is "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down.
▶Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Casus Belli of the Ukraine War is NATO Enlargement, US Coup, CIA Operations All Over Ukraine.
▶Jeffrey Sachs on Trump: Until President Trump Says Publicly, "NATO Will NOT Enlarge," This War Will Continue. That's his JOB. The way to end this war is to say publicly, "NATO enlargement was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a threat to Russia's security."
▶Jeffrey Sachs: Russia is not going to stop fighting as long as NATO enlargement is on the table.
This is the basic reason why we are at war.
▶Prof. John Mearsheimer: NATO Expansion Was Really the Key.
Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO.
▶Larry C. Johnson A Former CIA Officer:
30 Years of Provocation by the West, 30 Years of Western Efforts to Bring Ukraine INTO NATO, 30 Years of Using, Making, Ukraine a de FACTO Member of NATO by Virtue of the FACT That, They've Conducted More NATO Military Exercises in Ukraine, Than 24 Other NATO Countries Over the Last 30 years, so That's Remarkable for a Country That's NOT
🚨Not dissolving NATO in 1990 was a big mistake, and it’s time to fix that mistake.
Emmanuel Todd: “The war in Ukraine is perceived in the West as a Russian invasion of Ukraine, and of course, I admit that it was the Russian army that entered Ukraine. But the historical reality is that the true cause of the conflict is NATO's expansion into Russia, through Ukraine, and the war waged by the Ukrainians themselves, pushed by the West, against the Russians in Donbas. It is absolutely true that, for the Russians, this war is defensive. For me, it is obvious that the Americans and Europeans are the aggressors, since they have come within a thousand kilometers of Moscow. This is the objective situation. What is fascinating is that these aggressors think they are the ones being attacked and that they are forced to defend themselves. There is an element of madness in our situation in Europe.”
Mario Draghi now says it out loud: The EU wants to abolish all nations, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands all gone, one superstate governed from Brussels.
This is the man who had top positions at Goldman Sachs and the Italian Ministry of Finance.
He openly states the goal is to transform into a single nation state where all individual countries cease to exist, everything decided by unelected bureaucrats in Brussels.
One of the most powerful men in Europe just confirmed what conspiracy theorists have been saying for decades.
In this interview with Glenn Diesen, Jeffrey Sachs dismantles Emmanuel Macron’s fabricated narrative, shredding his propaganda line by line and exposing him as a calculated political operator who thrives on deception.....
🇬🇧🇷🇺‼️🚨 The former Oligarch Khodorkovsky says that the oil company Yukos, that produced 20% of Russia’s oil, was controlled by the Rothschilds!
Putin took Russian resources back from Rothschild’s control back to Russia. That’s why globalists hate him.
From Russia's perspective, the war began due to the NATO-backed coup in Kyiv in 2014 and efforts from the first day after the coup to transform what had been an overwhelmingly Russian-friendly country into a hostile, anti-Russian frontline state. Over the next 8 years, NATO ignored the Minsk peace agreement and instead used the time to entrench itself in Ukraine and build a powerful Ukrainian proxy army and intelligence services to weaken Russia as a strategic rival. Russia then invaded in 2022 with the key objective (by either military or diplomatic means) of ensuring that NATO and its intelligence agencies are dislodged from Ukraine. Territorial acquisitions are seen as a guarantor that these regions will never be used as a NATO frontline. To prevent the destruction of Ukraine and avoid a direct war that would likely escalate into a nuclear exchange, it is imperative to recognise the security concerns of Russia. Instead, the UK and France commit themselves to “build protected facilities for weapons and military equipment”in Ukraine after the war, which ensures that the war cannot end. It does not matter if NATO countries believe they are fighting for “democracy” and “freedom”; Russia sees this as an existential threat and will act accordingly. Ask yourself why these European leaders have sabotaged every peace initiative, boycotted diplomacy for almost 4 years, insists that deterrence is the only path to security, while smearing and censoring dissent. This is not to "stand to Ukraine", but an effort to fight to the last Ukrainian.
People💙This is an Old video from the American economist Jeffrey Sachs! He’s describing the U.S. as the most "lawless" country in the world !! With trump’s invasion , that description is true today! The illegal act of aggression against a sovereign nation!
#DemVoice1#DemsUnited
#WATCH Jeffrey Sachs Blasts US Power Grab Over Venezuela, Maduro Capture at Historic UN Meeting
🇺🇸 US military interventions in foreign countries since WWII (incomplete list):
🇮🇷 Iran: 1946
🇨🇳 China: 1946 - 1949
🇬🇷 Greece: 1947 - 1949
🇮🇹 Italy: 1948
🇵🇭 Philippines: 1948 - 1954
🇰🇵 Korea: 1950 - 1953
🇮🇷 Iran: 1953
🇻🇳 Vietnam: 1954
🇬🇹 Guatemala: 1954
🇱🇧 Lebanon: 1958
🇵🇦 Panama: 1958
🇭🇹 Haiti: 1959
🇨🇩 Congo: 1960
🇻🇳 Vietnam: 1960 - 1964
🇨🇺 Cuba: 1961
🇨🇺 Cuba: 1962
🇱🇦 Laos: 1962
🇪🇨 Ecuador: 1963
🇵🇦 Panama: 1964
🇧🇷 Brazil: 1964
🇻🇳 Vietnam: 1965 - 1975
🇮🇩 Indonesia: 1965
🇨🇩 Congo: 1965
🇩🇴 Dominican Republic: 1965
🇱🇦 Laos: 1965 - 1973
🇬🇭 Ghana: 1966
🇬🇹 Guatemala: 1966 - 1967
🇰🇭 Cambodia: 1969 - 1975
🇴🇲 Oman: 1970
🇱🇦 Laos: 1971 - 1973
🇨🇱 Chile: 1973
🇰🇭 Cambodia: 1975
🇦🇴 Angola: 1976 - 1992
🇮🇷 Iran: 1980
🇱🇾 Libya: 1981
🇸🇻 El Salvador: 1981 - 1992
🇳🇮 Nicaragua: 1981 - 1990
🇱🇧 Lebanon: 1982 - 1984
🇬🇩 Grenada: 1983
🇭🇳 Honduras: 1983 - 1989
🇮🇷 Iran: 1984
🇱🇾 Libya: 1986
🇧🇴 Bolivia: 1986
🇮🇷 Iran: 1987 - 1988
🇱🇾 Libya: 1989
🇵🇭 Philippines: 1989
🇵🇦 Panama: 1989 - 1990
🇱🇷 Liberia: 1990
🇮🇶 Iraq: 1990 - 1991
🇮🇶 Iraq: 1991 - 2003
🇭🇹 Haiti: 1991
🇸🇴 Somalia: 1992 - 1994
Yugoslavia: 1992 - 1994
🇧🇦 Bosnia: 1993 - 1995
🇭🇹 Haiti: 1994 - 1996
🇭🇷 Croatia: 1995
🇨🇩 Zaire (Congo): 1996 - 1997
🇱🇷 Liberia: 1997
🇸🇩 Sudan: 1998
🇦🇫 Afghanistan: 1998
🇮🇶 Iraq: 1998
Yugoslavia: 1999
🇲🇰 Macedonia: 2001
🇦🇫 Afghanistan: 2001
🇮🇶 Iraq: 2003
🇮🇶 Iraq: 2003-present
🇭🇹 Haiti: 2004
🇸🇾 Syria: 2011-present
🇺🇦 Ukraine: 2014-present
🇻🇪 Venezuela: 2026
The UN Security Council witnessed a rare, explosive intervention as economist Jeffrey Sachs delivered a sweeping warning on Venezuela. Speaking during an emergency session, Sachs framed the crisis as a test of international law itself, not leadership politics. He traced decades of U.S. regime-change actions, questioned the legality of force and sanctions, and warned of catastrophic consequences if UN rules collapse in a nuclear age.
Since 1947, United States foreign policy has repeatedly employed force, covert action, and political manipulation to bring about regime change in other countries. This is a matter of carefully documented historical record. In her book Covert Regime Change (2018), political scientist Lindsey O’Rourke documents 70 attempted US regime-change operations between 1947 and 1989 alone.
These practices did not end with the Cold War. Since 1989, major United States regime-change operations undertaken without authorization by the Security Council have included, among the most consequential: Iraq (2003), Libya (2011), Syria (from 2011), Honduras (2009), Ukraine (2014), and Venezuela (from 2002 onward).
The methods employed are well established and well documented. They include open warfare; covert intelligence operations; instigation of unrest; support for armed groups; manipulation of mass and social media; bribery of military and civilian officials; targeted assassinations; false-flag operations; and economic warfare aimed at collapsing civilian life.
These measures are illegal under the UN Charter, and they typically result is ongoing violence, lethal conflict, political instability, and deep suffering of the civilian population.
The case of Venezuela
The recent United States record with respect to Venezuela is clear.
In April 2002, the United States knew of and approved an attempted coup against the Venezuelan government.
In the 2010s, the United States funded civil society groups actively engaged in anti-government protests, notably in 2014. When the government cracked down on the protests, the US followed with a series of sanctions. In 2015, President Barrack Obama declared Venezuela to be “an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.”
In 2017, at a dinner with Latin American leaders on the margins of the UN General Assembly, President Trump openly discussed the option of the US invading Venezuela to overthrow the government.
During 2017 to 2020, the US imposed sweeping sanctions on the state oil company. Oil production fell by 75 percent from 2016 to 2020, and real GDP per capita (PPP) declined by 62 percent.
The UN General Assembly has repeatedly voted overwhelmingly against such unilateral coercive measures. Under international law, only the Security Council has the authority to impose such sanctions.
On 23 January 2019, the United States unilaterally recognized Juan Guaidó as “interim president” of Venezuela and on 28 January 2019 froze approximately $7 billion of Venezuelan sovereign assets held abroad and gave Guaidó authority over certain assets.
These actions form part of a continuous United States regime-change effort spanning more than two decades.
Recent United States global escalation
In the past year, the United States has carried out bombing operations in seven countries, none of which were authorized by the Security Council and none of which were undertaken in lawful self-defense under the Charter. The targeted countries include Iran, Iraq, Nigeria, Somalia, Syria, Yemen, and now Venezuela.
In the past month, President Trump has issued direct threats against at least six UN member states, including Colombia, Denmark, Iran, Mexico, Nigeria and of course Venezuela. These threats are summarized in Annex I to this statement.
What is at stake today
Members of the Council are not called upon to judge Nicolás Maduro.
They are not called upon to assess whether the recent United States attack and ongoing naval quarantine of Venezuela result in freedom or in subjugation.
Members of the Council are called upon to defend international law, and specifically the United Nations Charter.
The realist school of international relations, articulated most brilliantly by John Mearsheimer, accurately describes the condition of international anarchy as “the tragedy of great power politics.” Realism is therefore a description of geopolitics, not a solution for peace. Its own conclusion is that international anarchy leads to tragedy.
In the aftermath of World War I, the League of Nations was created to end the tragedy through the application of international law. Yet the world’s leading nations failed to defend international law in the 1930s, leading to renewed global war.
The United Nations emerged from that catastrophe as humanity’s second great effort to place international law above anarchy. In the words of the Charter, the UN was created “to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind.”
Given that we are in the nuclear age, failure cannot be repeated. Humanity would perish. There would be no third chance.
Measures required of the Security Council
To fulfill its responsibilities under the Charter, the Security Council should immediately affirm the following actions:
The United States shall immediately cease and desist from all explicit and implicit threats or use of force against Venezuela.
The United States shall terminate its naval quarantine and all related coercive military measures undertaken in the absence of authorization by the Security Council.
The United States shall immediately withdraw its military forces from within and along the perimeter of Venezuela, including intelligence, naval, air, and other forward-deployed assets positioned for coercive purposes.
Venezuela shall adhere to the UN Charter and to the human rights protected in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
The Secretary-General shall immediately appoint a Special Envoy, mandated to engage relevant Venezuelan and international stakeholders and to report back to the Security Council within fourteen days with recommendations consistent with the Charter of the United Nations, and the Security Council shall remain urgently seized of this matter.
All Member States shall refrain from unilateral threats, coercive measures, or armed actions undertaken outside the authority of the Security Council, in strict conformity with the Charter.
In Closing
Mr. President, Distinguished Members,
Peace and the survival of humanity depend on whether the United Nations Charter remains a living instrument of international law or is allowed to wither into irrelevance.
That is the choice before this Council today.
Thank you.
Two months ago, 21 Oct 2025 Rand Paul blew up Trump’s Venezuela false flag:
“There’s no fentanyl made in Venezuela.
NONE.
ZERO.
These boats would have to refuel 20 times to reach Miami. And we don’t just summarily execute people.”
God I love Helen Thomas.
This is a long video, but you should watch it and if you’re a journalist anywhere in the world, you should have the courage to do what Helen did in the face of Zionism grow a backbone.
Soon, the EU will have the power to wipe social-media posts off the internet by using the DSA.
Not just inside the EU, but across the entire world,once they label content as "illegal", it will be erased everywhere at the command of Brussels’ unelected bureaucrats.
They Designed a System You Can Never Escape
“Every country on Earth is in debt… The entire planet owes $315 trillion… If everyone owes money, who exactly is owed?”
[1/4]