@HexLexYGO "I acknowledge that this behaviour was designed to be upsetting, but also have you considered that it should be allowed because you could choose to be less upset?"
@GavinVerhey@fireshoes @phoxie_lol Hey Gavin. The legacy announcement here suggests that when two decks have "combined presence approaching 30% of the field", a ban might be warranted. I'm wondering if that logic also applies to pauper?
@mtg_ds A line is a subsection of the game tree for which you've determined your preferred move at each node in advance. While the game is inside a line, you are happy to take those game actions without stopping for further tree search.
@MeyerEmpire The main problem is that once I stick a battle screech I'm usually in great shape unless opponent has a sweeper, so I want to not overextend; Vet is another 1-health dude that dies to the same sweepers, while also actively rewarding me for overextending.
@paolo_donfra @raptor56mtg @an_plane Used the draft log to help paste the pack contents. Had to initially prompt the AI in such a way that in would remember what it was doing across 45 messages, which was only somewhat successful.
@LipetzNathan Ok, I admit, cutting the elf is a good point, that didn't make a lot of sense to me.
Overall, I've quite liked having random mediocre new card around though, and I enjoy the feel changing version-to-version with them
@LipetzNathan > Cutting "no fun" cards for shitty standard unplayables
Is there a particular swap you're referring to here? Very few of the most-recent swaps fit that description literally imo. Unless you haven't played the mtgo vintage cube in like a year.