Reposts and Likes are not a promotion or agreement. Strictly over 18 only. Strictly no government agencies or their stormtroopers. 🔞 All tweets are humorous.
Every single person who still cringes at the memory of trying to bullshit their way through an interview or exam question: today, the slate is wiped clean. Set down your burden of shame. Nothing - nothing, I say - could touch this.
£459,926 taxpayer funding on "The role of digital technology in social networks and wellbeing of unaccompanied young refugees"
"Excessive screen time and social media use are affecting mental health of current youth, and young refugees increasingly use digital technology: it is a key tool to meet their needs during their flight, and to support them to establish and maintain social connections and integrate in their new country. However, it also exposes them to risks."
https://t.co/Jrs1vDW0l9
Makerfield Is Flipping to Restore
From Day 4 of @Luca_Johnson96's interviews in Makerfield. Out on https://t.co/kIFj1cW30x soon.
A party that will put the British people first. Join @RestoreBritain: https://t.co/itGJna5C2V
@AlistairCarns@MaizyDaizyZzzz I criticised you for not defending veterans over retrospective punishment.
I appreciate you were aware and confident you could change this from within. It now appears this was impossible under Starmer and Hermer's drive to target veterans and you have taken action.
Sorry.
Earlier today, the Polish parliament observed a moment of silence in memory of the murdered Henry Nowak and all victims of anti-white racism.
You can always count on Poland.
They throw around your money like it’s their own.
It’s a worthwhile cause, but John Swinney should withdraw this donation from the government, and instead donate a sum out of his OWN pocket.
If he does so, I’ll happily match whatever he personally donates.
@SBarrettBar It's simple.
Dan Jarvis voted against an amendment in Parliament calling for a national statutory inquiry into grooming gangs.
He's a treacherous scumbag.
@RestoreBritain#GetThemOut
Last year, a video went viral of a scared, 12 year old girl in Dundee.
She was waving weapons, shouting at a migrant to leave her alone.
Almost immediately, many on the left were calling this girl a liar (and worse). They were saying the “far-right” were whipping up ‘anti-migrant hate’.
People like @HumzaYousaf & many more called it ‘bullsh*t’.
Many, including people like @jdpoc while calling her a liar & talking about her ‘hatred’, showed pictures of the little girl. Just to make sure everyone knew who the ‘liar’ they were talking about, was.
A fundraiser for the girl was mocked, suggesting she’d use the money to buy “machetes and IronBru”
She was a child. Their posts were seen by hundreds of thousands of people.
She wasn’t ‘hate-filled’, she was scared.
Yesterday, her version of events was proven to be true. She was sexually harassed by a migrant and another child physically assaulted too.
The man and his sister were prosecuted.
How shameful that children need to arm themselves for protection.
How shameful that adults will deny their reality.
How shameful that some people are so desperate to defend migration into this country, that they will literally mock children who are victims of their crimes.
Shame on you all.
I’ll be fascinated to see how many of you publicly apologise to the girl, in the same public way that you called her a liar.
I won’t hold my breath…
I hope this girl is ok.
https://t.co/6G0Iz3cf1h
It has emerged in the Telegraph that Reform's Jenrick and Braverman's fast-track asylum scheme meant that illegals completed a TEN PAGE 'questionnaire' rather than a proper face-to-face interview.
Their scheme applied to six countries.
Afghanistan.
Eritrea.
Libya.
Syria.
Yemen.
And of course, Sudan.
As we know, the Sudanese monster was handed a visa after going through the Reform MP's asylum scheme.
These are backward countries that make medieval England look sophisticated and forward-thinking.
They treat women like dirt and are generally entirely incompatible with our standards, culture and way of life.
I will make a firm Restore Britain policy commitment here today.
Every single individual handed a visa under Jenrick and Braverman's fast-track asylum scheme will be deported under a Restore Britain Government.
Except one. He won't be deported. A far more permanent fate awaits him.
Not only that, we will end immigration from those six countries. Entirely.
In addition.
Afghans, Eritreans, Libyans, Syrians, Yemenis and Sudanese men currently in our country living off the taxpayer, unable to speak English, committing crime, failing to work, claiming benefits?
They will be deported.
Any of those nationalities who arrived illegally will be removed.
That will mean a vast amount of deportations. I mean vast.
Restore Britain will repair just some of the damage caused by Reform's Jenrick and Braverman.
Evidently not all, tragically.
A Restore Britain Government will mass deport the fake asylum seekers, illegals and freeloaders that these Reform politicians welcomed into our country.
That is my pledge to you all.
Agenda 2030 Or The Defence Of The Realm. Starmer Has Made His Choice. John Healey Has Resigned Over It.
This morning Britain woke up without a Defence Secretary. By lunchtime it knew why.
The numbers tell the story precisely. The Ministry of Defence faces a £28 billion funding shortfall over four years. Healey wanted £18 billion. He was offered £13.5 billion of which defence chiefs regarded only £10 billion as real money. The remaining £3.5 billion was, in the words of the Telegraph, invented through magical accounting tricks. The Chief of the Defence Staff, Sir Richard Knighton, took the unusual step of writing directly to Starmer to warn that the money was not enough. The head of the British armed forces writing directly to the Prime Minister is not a routine communication. It is a signal of desperation.
Starmer told NATO last week that it is our intelligence assessment that there could be an attack by Russia on NATO as soon as 2030. Those are his words. His government's assessment. Shared with our allies. Four years away. And his Treasury offered the man responsible for defending against that threat an accounting trick and a two page summary instead of a funded plan. Why. Because the money was needed elsewhere.
In 2015 every United Nations member state including Britain signed the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Its 17 goals and 169 targets commit signatory nations to facilitating migration, eliminating inequality, achieving net zero and embedding inclusive institutions. No British parliament voted on it. No British public was consulted. It was adopted at a UN summit and has been implemented ever since through regulatory frameworks, public sector guidance and institutional capture rather than democratic mandate. It is not a conspiracy. It is a publicly available document on the UN website. And its priorities, net zero, welfare, migration, DEI, are precisely the budgets this government has protected while offering the defence of the realm an accounting trick.
Ed Miliband refused to cut his net zero budget to fund defence. The Labour Party refused to cut welfare spending that would have freed up billions. The £10 billion in asylum accommodation contracts continues. The DEI infrastructure embedded across British policing, the NHS, the civil service and the education system continues to be funded. Every one of these is a commitment that takes precedence over the defence of the realm in this government's spending decisions.
The hierarchy of priorities is now visible. A government that has spent two years embedding progressive transformation across British institutions, protecting the net zero agenda from cuts and managing mass migration has discovered that it cannot simultaneously do all of that and defend the country. When the moment of decision arrived the progressive agenda was protected and the armed forces were handed a two page summary and told to make do.
Lord Robertson, the former Labour Defence Secretary and NATO Secretary General, warned in April that Britain was underprepared, underinsured and under attack. He said there was a corrosive complacency in Britain's political leadership. The army has been reduced to its smallest size in 200 years. Seven warships have been axed. The Defence Investment Plan was due last autumn, delayed through winter, missed its spring deadline and has now produced the resignation of the Defence Secretary on the day it was finally meant to be published.
Healey's letter says without a plan that meets the moment he is being forced to make decisions that would reduce the readiness of our forces, increase the risk to personnel on operations and could make the country less safe. He had no other option but to resign.
In the most dangerous security environment since the Cold War a Labour government has chosen the globalist agenda over the defence of the realm. That choice has now cost it its Defence Secretary. The question is what it will cost the country.