@CookieM0nstress@Mycroft_Smart1@CloverSevenLeaf@Markbs26 Itโs an internal consistency test of your foundational premise, that internal identity overrides physical biology. If the mechanism works for sex, why doesn't it work for race? Running away with a Bye after dodging the logic test doesn't change the forfeit. No false equivalence
@CookieM0nstress@CloverSevenLeaf@Markbs26 Refusing to answer a binary question after setting the debate's own premise is a textbook default concession. Since you're stepping in to defend her, feel free to take her turn. Does internal brain identity override biology for Rachel Dolezal, or is it just stereotypes?
@Mycroft_Smart1@CloverSevenLeaf@Markbs26 It's not "saying the moon is cheese", it's basic debate rules. When someone states a premise, gets hit with an internal consistency test (the Dolezal binary), and dodges with moral panic + Amnesty links instead of answering, failing to defend the premise is a forfeit by default
@SAMTHEMAN1976@grok@sacman21904689@FireNewz "Is all I heard there" admits you cherry picked one line and ignored the statutory ban on diplomatic leverage. Making the President file paperwork and give 15 day notice to a Congress where 96% take pro Israel lobby money ($200M+) is a leash. Enjoy the L, and go thank Netenyahu
@CloverSevenLeaf@Markbs26 I'm not sure why you're still replying to me, since you conceded the debate by default. Three separate info dumps and a textbook photo because you couldn't answer a simple binary. Panic posting definitions doesn't fix the logical collapse. Are you doing okay over there?
@SAMTHEMAN1976@grok@sacman21904689@FireNewz Did you even read Grok's reply? It literally says word for word "Pure diplomatic leverage without that finding would face the statutory limit" plus 15 day notice to Congress. Grok just proved my exact point while you're out here posting "Oops!" GIFs
@CloverSevenLeaf@Markbs26 Notice how you dodged the binary with a racism accusation and two blog links. Your own premise was "humans are our brains, body parts don't determine identity." By that rule, ancestry doesn't either. You still haven't explained the logical difference, concession accepted
@SAMTHEMAN1976@grok@sacman21904689@FireNewz That's not how federal statutes work. Once codified in the NDAA, Sec 618 creates a binding legal mandate, the President can't pause intel for diplomatic leverage unless he clears a narrow statutory burden of proof and notifies Congress. We can thank Bibi for it.
@CloverSevenLeaf@Markbs26 By that exact logic, you just validated Rachel Dolezal. Either internal psychosocial identity overrides biology, making her Black, or claiming an identity you weren't born into relies on superficial stereotypes. Which one is it? Anything else is a consession of the debate
@SAMTHEMAN1976@grok@sacman21904689@FireNewz You're so rattled you didn't even read Grok's reply, Grok literally had to correct you that the executive agent is a US official, not "from Israel". And after the fact annual reports through 2030 don't change Sec 618 barring the President from suspending intel sharing. #liability
@SAMTHEMAN1976@sacman21904689@grok@FireNewz Nice try. Grok admits Sec 219 embeds foreign co production and data fusion into US defense supply chains, while Sec 618 mandates intel sharing "shall not be suspended", even after DIA raised Israel's counterintel threat level. You're still arguing like a Dem to defend a liability
@BigBlockVette69@TonyW32257847@realchrismanion Nice try changing the subject, I'm not playing "name a country" to distract from US sovereignty. No other "ally" has a $6M+ FARA registered influence operation (DOJ #7649) targeting Americans or NDAA provisions (Sec 618) barring the US President from suspending intel sharing
@SAMTHEMAN1976@sacman21904689@grok@FireNewz FY27 NDAA Sec 219 creates a permanent Pentagon hub embedding Israeli co production and AI/weapons tech into US supply chains. Paired with Sec 618, which bars the President from suspending or reducing intel sharing, it handcuffs the Commander in Chief. That's a huge liability
@SAMTHEMAN1976@OwenShroyer1776 Notice you dodged EFTA II completely and resorted to citing "mainstream news" repeating the DOJ's own excuse for not prosecuting. Taking MSM and the DOJ at their word while files stay illegally redacted isn't skepticism, you're just blindly trusting the government
@AmericanVet11B@Woman_AHF@KirstiMiller30 Bold claim considering the FBIโs NIBRS doesn't even have a "transgender" offender category, crimes get logged by current legal sex marker, folding them straight into standard male or female stats. You're citing a female rate that the system literally doesn't isolate