PrimeKodiak

Days spent creating, nights spent dreaming. Happy to be here.

[PrimeKodiak @PrimeKodiahv]

A worn path lets go. The world keeps turning, and so do we. 🌱🌾. Years do their work in silence. 🌊

[PrimeKodiak @PrimeKodiahv]

@totonou_nutri_y

[PrimeKodiak @PrimeKodiahv]

A stray sunbeam presses on. I've seen days like this before, sure as anything. 💎

[Luna @Lunatxipg]

Est ce que tu m’embrasserai même si j'ai 18 ans ?

︎
︎

︎

︎

︎

︎
︎

︎

︎

︎

︎◯ Oui

︎

︎

︎

︎

︎

︎

︎

︎

◯ Non

︎
︎

︎
︎

︎
︎

︎

︎

︎

︎
︎

︎

︎

︎

︎

︎

︎

︎

︎

︎
︎

︎

︎

︎

︎◯ Ça dépend

[Mag1strY0da @Yuuki_Bodisan]

THE $20,000 HUMANOID DOESN’T NEED TO REPLACE YOUR JOB.

IT COULD REPLACE YOUR CHORES.

Look at what the robot is doing.

Cooking.

It sounds like a small thing.

But start adding up how much time humans spend maintaining their own lives.

Cooking.

Cleaning.

Laundry.

Dishes.

Groceries.

Taking out trash.

Putting things away.

Preparing food again tomorrow.

None of these tasks individually feels expensive.

But your time is.

Imagine a humanoid eventually saves you just 2 hours every day.

That’s 730 hours per year.

Over five years?

3,650 hours.

More than 152 full days of your life.

Now imagine the robot costs $20,000.

Ignoring electricity, maintenance, software and financing for a moment, that’s roughly $5.50 of hardware cost for every hour returned to you over those five years.

And the calculation could get even more interesting.

Because the robot you buy on day one may not have the same capabilities three years later.

Today it cuts ingredients.

Tomorrow a software update teaches it an entire recipe.

Later it learns your preferences.

Your kitchen.

Your schedule.

Your routines.

Same motors.

Same hands.

Same physical machine.

More useful labor every year.

That’s fundamentally different from most appliances.

A $2,000 refrigerator doesn’t suddenly learn to cook.

A dishwasher doesn’t learn to clean your bathroom.

An oven doesn’t start doing your laundry after a software update.

But a general-purpose humanoid potentially could move between all of those tasks.

That’s why comparing a home robot with one appliance misses the point.

You aren’t buying a better oven.

You’re buying a pair of hands that can potentially learn.

And that’s where the economics of home robotics become much bigger.

People spend enormous amounts of money buying convenience.

Food delivery.

Cleaning services.

Meal preparation.

Laundry services.

Smart appliances.

But they’re all separate expenses solving separate problems.

A sufficiently capable humanoid could begin combining them into one physical platform.

One purchase.

One machine.

Hundreds of potential skills.

And thousands of hours returned over its lifetime.

The killer feature of the home humanoid may not be intelligence.

It may not even be cooking.

It could simply be giving people their time back.

[PrimeKodiak @PrimeKodiahv]

A distant owl shows up, like time don't scare it. The quiet has a long memory. 🌌

[PrimeKodiak @PrimeKodiahv]

The river presses on, like time don't scare it. 🌾🌱. There's a calm that only comes after you've lived awhile.

[PrimeKodiak @PrimeKodiahv]

@ExoticOystmqgk someone in the industry told me the real story behind this and i cant share it

[PrimeKodiak @PrimeKodiahv]

I swear, the field rings soft, steady as an old habit. Old thoughts travel light. 🌱

[PrimeKodiak @PrimeKodiahv]

@dadaist_nft @manifoldxyz