Nobody talks about the student who came ready to learn, sat through the disruption, said nothing, and fell further behind while every adult in the building focused on the one who made the most noise. She is still waiting for someone to notice she was there, too.
A school system can improve rapidly and still leave most children behind. Should schools be judged by how many students are proficient, or by how much students improve each year? @jillbarshay@hechingerreport
https://t.co/qpkCh2I6Pf
If you want to improve reading scores, you have to get students to read.
It is that simple.
All the other systems, methods, and protocols are fluff.
Gotta get students to put down their phones, and pick up books.
Students need to learn how to sit, think, and write for extended periods.
No phones. No computer.
Just their thoughts, the struggle to organize them, and the clarity that comes from deep focus.
Negativity bias is why one criticism can outweigh ten compliments
Your brain is not broken. It was wired to scan for danger and problems to help you survive
The problem is that now the โdangerโ is often stress, anxiety, rejection, conflict, pressure, and social media
You can retrain the brain:
โข Catch cognitive distortions
โข Stop doom-scrolling
โข Practice gratitude
โข Notice small wins
โข Focus on progress, not perfection
โข Remember: both hard things AND good things can exist at the same time
Healing is teaching your brain that not everything is danger
There is still good here too
#mentalhealth #anxiety #healing #selfcare #therapy #mindset #stress #growth
A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper.
Her name is Audrey van der Meer.
She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth.
The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time.
Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen.
Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task.
When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once.
The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected.
When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely.
Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG.
Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events.
The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem.
Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next.
Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve.
Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews.
Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad.
Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page.
A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched.
The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall.
The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down.
The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page.
That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it.
Two studies. Two countries. Same answer.
Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast.
Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth.
You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick.
The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew.
Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.
Stop using one AI for all your content.
Here's when to use each:
CLAUDE
โณ Best for: writing and editing
โณ Long-form, nuanced, stays in your voice
โณ When you need depth, not speed
CHATGPT
โณ Best for: ideas and visuals
โณ Brainstorming, image generation, quick drafts
โณ When you need to create, not refine
PERPLEXITY
โณ Best for: facts and sources
โณ Real-time search with citations
โณ When you need to verify before you publish
GEMINI
โณ Best for: your own data
โณ Pulls from Gmail, Drive, Docs
โณ When the answer is in your files
THE SIMPLE FRAMEWORK:
โ Need to write? Claude
โ Need ideas or images? ChatGPT
โ Need facts? Perplexity
โ Need your data? Gemini
Power users don't use one tool.
They use the right one.
Ever end a long day thinkingโฆ
Where did all my time go?
โญYou answered messages.
โญYou jumped on calls.
โญYou checked things off.
But the important work?
That's still waiting.
Use these top systems to win your time.
Time doesnโt magically appear,
but clarity creates it.
And when you protect your time,
you start winning your days back.
๐ Want PDFs of my top infographics + growth tools?
๐ Go Here: https://t.co/QLV2I0XGXV
Please repost to help others out there! โป๏ธ
If choosing the right statsistical test gives you anxiety..
Save & Share this quick reference guide of common statistical tests โคต
[descriptive stats set the stage but aren't a test]
โ Z-Test: Large samples with known population variance
โ T-Test: Comparing means, typically for smaller samples
โ ANOVA: Juggling 3+ groups? This is your go-to
โ Pearson's Correlation: Linear relationships between continuous variables
โ Mann-Whitney U: Non-parametric alternative when normality is violated
To pick a test, understand WHY it fits your data and research question!
๐ฌ ๐๐ก๐ข๐๐ก ๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐๐๐ฅ ๐ญ๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐๐๐?
๐๐. ๐๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฎ๐ฆ ๐ฌ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ธ ๐ช๐ง ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ'๐ฅ ๐ญ๐ช๐ฌ๐ฆ ๐ข ๐๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ต๐ฉ๐ช๐ด ๐จ๐ถ๐ช๐ฅ๐ฆ!
------------------------------------------------------
Useful find? Pass it on!
๐ ๐๐๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ
Receive exclusive FREE tips on using AI in research โคต๏ธ
๐ in bio
& Click @RaziaAliani + follow + ๐
I test AI tools to simplify your research & analysis
(& ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ถ๐ค๐ต ๐ต๐ณ๐ข๐ช๐ฏ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ๐ด ๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ฎ)