𝑷𝑹𝑰𝑵𝑪𝑬 𝑬𝑴𝑬𝑲𝑨

1 day ago

BREAKING: Igbo Leaders of Thought (ILT) supports “the right to self-determination for Nigeria’s ethnic nationalities,” and insists that regions should be organised around “ethno-linguistic civilizations or groupings thereof.” Ans it called for the unconditional release of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. The statement was signed by Emeritus Prof. Elochukwu Amucheazi, President-General of ILT; Senator John Azuta-Mbata, President-General of Ohanaeze Ndigbo; Prof. Dozie Chukwuokolo, Secretary-General of ILT; Ambassador Uche Ajulu-Okeke, adviser to the Igbo delegation; Dr Katchi Ononuju, deputy leader of the Igbo delegation; and Prof. Obasi Igwe, leader of the Igbo delegation to the Abuja conference. The group said releasing and rehabilitating political prisoners, particularly Kanu and his colleagues, would help create trust and confidence in negotiations over Nigeria’s future. The leaders also proposed regional or nationwide referendums through which Nigerians would determine the political and constitutional structure they wanted.

AloyEjimakor's tweet photo. BREAKING:
Igbo Leaders of Thought (ILT) supports “the right to self-determination for Nigeria’s ethnic nationalities,” and insists that regions should be organised around “ethno-linguistic civilizations or groupings thereof.” Ans it called for the unconditional release of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

The statement was signed by Emeritus Prof. Elochukwu Amucheazi, President-General of ILT; Senator John Azuta-Mbata, President-General of Ohanaeze Ndigbo; Prof. Dozie Chukwuokolo, Secretary-General of ILT; Ambassador Uche Ajulu-Okeke, adviser to the Igbo delegation; Dr Katchi Ononuju, deputy leader of the Igbo delegation; and Prof. Obasi Igwe, leader of the Igbo delegation to the Abuja conference.

The group said releasing and rehabilitating political prisoners, particularly Kanu and his colleagues, would help create trust and confidence in negotiations over Nigeria’s future.

The leaders also proposed regional or nationwide referendums through which Nigerians would determine the political and constitutional structure they wanted.

406

225

Princevejims retweeted

1 day ago

FREE NNAMDI KANU Written by Kio Amachree SKJ Records 2026 Free am Free am now Free Nnamdi Kanu Free am now Free Free Free Nairobi Kenya Na there dem take am No jurisdiction No extradition Illegal order Illegal kidnapping Dem drug am Dem carry am Put am for crate Fly am away All the way West African prison Torture am Abuse am Accuse am Treason dem say All kinds of lies All kinds of lies Treason dem say Because he talk freedom Free Nnamdi Kanu Free am now Free Free Free Nnamdi Kanu Give am back Give am back Give am back to his people Sokoto prison Life imprisonment For what? Talking freedom Life imprisonment For talking freedom System evil System corrupt System crooked Too political Free am now I say free am now Free Free Free Nnamdi Kanu Free am from detention Free am from Sokoto prison Free Free Free Nnamdi Kanu Give am back to his people And where the British? Where the British? You give am passport British citizen You supposed to help am So where the British? Where the British? Shame Shame Shame So-called civilization That gave us the law Shame Shame Shame No treason Kidnapping Torture Abuse of the legal system No treason Kidnapping Torture Abuse of the legal system Free am Free am Free Nnamdi Kanu Free am now Free Free Free Nnamdi Kanu Give am back to his people Free am from detention Free am from prison Free Free Free NNAMDI KANU Give am back Give am back Give am back to his people FREE AM NOW.

813

16K

Princevejims retweeted

9 days ago

This video is posted for the sake of telling our story, our history, and the sacrifices made. It bears Dick Tiger, former world light heavyweight boxing champion, speaking in 1968. What he said is a lesson on how far a threatened people will go in defense of their freedom.

719

200

17K

DONDIVACALI 👑 Beauty • Hair • Fashion Boutique + Hair Services ✨ Creating looks. Building confidence. 🛍️ Shop the latest looks ↓

9 days ago

We are here in Port Harcourt, for your home, office, industrial cleaning.. very smart and easy... Contact us +2349077001477

Who to follow

Princevejims retweeted

14 days ago

Let us begin today’s #XTuesday for the release of MAZI NNAMDI KANU by strongly urging President Tinubu to implement the standing Directives of the United Nations to de-proscribe IPOB, and halt the criminalization of its activities and alleged members. Below is a verbatim excerpt from the said Directives: “We are particularly concerned by the designation of IPOB as a terrorist organization and allegations that its leaders, supporters, sympathisers, and even some individuals who had merely displayed its symbols have been arrested and appear to have been charged as "terrorists" on occasion. “While recognizing the rise of regional tensions, as well as a range of challenging political claims advanced by IPOB, we nonetheless warn against the categorization of uncomfortable or challenging political speech as terrorism. “We respectfully advance our views that the human rights implications of this proscription are considerable and not in compliance with international human rights law binding on Nigeria, or with best practice in relation to counter-terrorism strategies. “Accordingly, we respectfully urge your Excellency' Government to reconsider the proscription of IPOB as a terrorist group and address the legal concerns on regulation of assembly, freedom of expression, and due process outlined in this communication. We stand ready to provide assistance in this regard.” #FreeNnamdiKanu.

AloyEjimakor's tweet photo. Let us begin today’s #XTuesday for the release of MAZI NNAMDI KANU by strongly urging President Tinubu to implement the standing Directives of the United Nations to de-proscribe IPOB, and halt the criminalization of its activities and alleged members. Below is a verbatim excerpt from the said Directives:

“We are particularly concerned by the designation of IPOB as a
terrorist organization and allegations that its leaders, supporters, sympathisers, and
even some individuals who had merely displayed its symbols have been arrested and appear to have been charged as "terrorists" on occasion.

“While recognizing the rise of regional tensions, as well as a range of challenging political claims advanced by IPOB, we nonetheless warn against the categorization of uncomfortable or challenging political speech as terrorism.

“We respectfully advance our views that the human rights implications of this proscription are considerable and not in compliance with international human rights law binding on Nigeria, or with best practice in relation to counter-terrorism strategies.

“Accordingly, we respectfully urge your Excellency' Government to reconsider the proscription of IPOB as a terrorist group and address the legal concerns on regulation of assembly, freedom of expression, and due process outlined in this communication. We stand ready to
provide assistance in this regard.”

#FreeNnamdiKanu.

686

11K

Princevejims retweeted

10 days ago

THIS IS MASS MURDER: "They sprayed something in the cell after putting us inside and people started falling down" - surviving miner in NSCDC custody tells Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo (Interior Minister).

504

446

24K

Princevejims retweeted

11 days ago

This clip featuring General Ojukwu is from 1982, following his return to Nigeria from exile. Here, he briefly discusses his prime role during the Civil War, emphasizing that the war was not a personal pursuit, but a response to the plight and collective sentiment of the Igbo people at the time. In other words, anything that has to do with the place of Ndigbo in Nigeria is an issue that affects all Igbos, whether for good or bad. It’s inescapable. Thus, whenever one Igbo feels threatened or tests injustice, all Igbos feel threatened. It’s in the Igbo DNA, and Ojukwu captured it well in this video. Doesn’t this remind you of MAZI NNAMDI KANU and all Igbos currently in political distress?

731

161

21K

Princevejims retweeted

10 days ago

It is a stark irony of Nigerian politics that Peter Obi—a former governor whose tenure in Anambra was defined by prudent financial management, zero debt, and visible investments in infrastructure and education—remains the country's most heavily scrutinized ex-governor. While politicians with documented histories of systemic corruption and unexplainable wealth walk free with minimal pushback, Obi’s public record of integrity is constantly dissected under an aggressive microscope. This double standard exposes a flawed political environment: in Nigeria, transparency and accountability do not shield you from endless political targeting; they inexplicably make you a bigger target for partisan witch-hunts. There’s no other ex-Governor that can boast of what is contained in the screenshot below. None! And this is not happening to Obi just because he’s an ex-Governor. It’s happening because he’s running for President. So, it has gone from a mere spat between Soludo and Obi to a grand national conspiracy of ethnic partisans who are alarmed that Peter Obi is the first Igbo man that appears to have a fighting chance of clinching the presidency since the end of the civil war.

AloyEjimakor's tweet photo. It is a stark irony of Nigerian politics that Peter Obi—a former governor whose tenure in Anambra was defined by prudent financial management, zero debt, and visible investments in infrastructure and education—remains the country's most heavily scrutinized ex-governor.

While politicians with documented histories of systemic corruption and unexplainable wealth walk free with minimal pushback, Obi’s public record of integrity is constantly dissected under an aggressive microscope.

This double standard exposes a flawed political environment: in Nigeria, transparency and accountability do not shield you from endless political targeting; they inexplicably make you a bigger target for partisan witch-hunts.

There’s no other ex-Governor that can boast of what is contained in the screenshot below. None!

And this is not happening to Obi just because he’s an ex-Governor. It’s happening because he’s running for President.

So, it has gone from a mere spat between Soludo and Obi to a grand national conspiracy of ethnic partisans who are alarmed that Peter Obi is the first Igbo man that appears to have a fighting chance of clinching the presidency since the end of the civil war.

535

269

21K

10 days ago

"They sprayed something in the cell after putting us inside, and people started falling down" — surviving miner recounts ordeal in NSCDC custody during interior minister Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo's visit to Niger state

Princevejims retweeted

14 days ago

Landmark CEO, Paul Onwuanibe (an Igbo) was issued a 7-day notice that he never even received before they demolished the Lagos property he bought 20 years ago for $17m and developed with $30m. Can this man ever be convinced to still believe in Nigeria? Where’s the joy?

298

640

129K

Princevejims retweeted

15 days ago

A few months before his rendition in 2021, MAZI NNAMDI KANU predicted (or prophesied) the BREAKUP of United Kingdom, which appears to be coming true now that Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland have indicated their desire to exit United Kingdom. This is the abridged video.

215

419

86K

Princevejims retweeted

13 days ago

“In the same token, some geopolitical or regional zones in Nigeria may take similar concerted initiatives to redraw the political map of Nigeria at the fullness of time.” - Chief Chekwas Okorie, reacting to the latest Scottish, Irish & Welsh self determination initiative. #MNK.

604

314

12K

Princevejims retweeted

BossBet @Crocodile127711

18 days ago

Follow the Free MNk channel on WhatsApp: https://t.co/hi5AUCVPQ6

Princevejims retweeted

19 days ago

The Nigerian Civil War was not an inevitable tragedy; it was a sustained policy choice backed by imperial interests, notably the British. Had the British government genuinely wanted to prevent the conflict, it possessed every lever of power to do so. As the primary colonial architect of Nigeria’s fragile regional structure, Britain deliberately left behind systemic fault lines designed to maintain influence. When tensions boiled over, London chose to step in, not as a mediator, but as a decisive backer of military action—supplying millions of rounds of ammunition, heavy artillery, and armored vehicles to protect its massive Shell-BP oil assets and geopolitical clout. A true push for peace, a full arms embargo, or genuine support for regional autonomy at Aburi could have altered history. Instead, the Wilson administration covertly escalated hardware flow while publicly preaching neutrality. Wars don't just happen; they are fueled. Britain chose oil, leverage, and arms sales over preventing human catastrophe.

882

704

128

36K

Princevejims retweeted

24 days ago

The doctrine of double criminality that departed Kanu’s trial By ALOY EJIMAKOR In one of my previous public comments on the infamous conviction of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, I had briefly mentioned how the failure to state the foreign locale of the alleged offenses robbed the court of jurisdiction by cutting the court off from determining whether or not the alleged broadcasts constituted offenses in the foreign country where they emanated. At law, this is known as double criminality. Under the repealed TPAA 2013, an act committed abroad was an offence only if it had an "impact in Nigeria." But under the TPPA 2022 in force (when Kanu’s matter commenced anew), that same act is only an offence if it (i) has an impact in Nigeria, and (ii) is also a crime in the foreign country where it was committed (that is: double criminality) - which fundamentally alters the legal definition of an extraterritorial offense or the act constituting the offense. Recall that, whereas the charges levied against Kanu claimed that the broadcasts (made from an unnamed foreign soil) “had impact in Nigeria”, they failed to expressly state that the broadcasts are “also a crime in the foreign country where they were made” (double criminality). This is a key omission that rendered all the pertinent charges incompetent, thus robbing the court of the requisite jurisdiction to have subjected Kanu to trial, without more. Further, the Supreme Court's decision to allow the trial to continue was predicated on the general jurisdiction of Federal High Courts; it was not a final determination on the applicable substantive law for the trial on the merits. So, when the trial de novo (anew) was ultimately underway before Justice Omotosho, the court was bound to first determine the applicable law in use, and this was exactly what Kanu had requested in his preliminary objection which the court flatly refused to determine. In Military Governor of Lagos State v. Ojukwu, judicial reassignment post-recusal mandated fresh hearings. Thus, Kanu’s trial was not “pending” under Section 97 TPPA 2022 but a new proceeding under the TPPA 2022. This also comports with Section 36(12) Constitution under which offenses are triable only under a “written law in force” at the time or moment of trial. TPAA 2013 was no longer in force in 2025 when Kanu’s trial actually commenced. Therefore, for the court to assert extraterritorial jurisdiction, the prosecution was required to plead and prove that Kanu’s alleged acts (broadcasts) constituted a criminal offence both in Nigeria, and also in the United Kingdom or Kenya, which were the places Kanu was domiciled between 2018 and 2021 when the broadcasts were alleged to have been made (according to the charge sheet). It is, therefore, left to conjecture that the only reason the prosecution was dodgy on the law that applied was this: Knowing that the broadcasts were made from either Britain (where Kanu is a citizen) or Kenya (where he was itinerant), it was clear to the prosecution that such acts do not constitute acts of terrorism under the domestic laws of those countries, otherwise Kanu would have been arrested and tried in either Britain or Kenya. Thus, the failure to specify the foreign situs or country where the broadcasts were made was profoundly prejudicial to Kanu. The charges also failed the muster of Section 220 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015 (ACJA) which bars jurisdiction if the charges omitted a legally required information that could mislead the defendant on how to frame his defense. The Supreme Court in Yakubu v FRN (2020) and other authorities, has consistently held that a charge which fails to disclose an essential ingredient of the offence is void and confers no jurisdiction on the court. It is on the basis of these reasons (plus more) that I had insisted from day one that the Federal High Court lacked jurisdiction to have proceeded with Kanu’s trial.

AloyEjimakor's tweet photo. The doctrine of double criminality that departed Kanu’s trial

By ALOY EJIMAKOR

In one of my previous public comments on the infamous conviction of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, I had briefly mentioned how the failure to state the foreign locale of the alleged offenses robbed the court of jurisdiction by cutting the court off from determining whether or not the alleged broadcasts constituted offenses in the foreign country where they emanated. At law, this is known as double criminality.

Under the repealed TPAA 2013, an act committed abroad was an offence only if it had an "impact in Nigeria." But under the TPPA 2022 in force (when Kanu’s matter commenced anew), that same act is only an offence if it (i) has an impact in Nigeria, and (ii) is also a crime in the foreign country where it was committed (that is: double criminality) - which fundamentally alters the legal definition of an extraterritorial offense or the act constituting the offense.

Recall that, whereas the charges levied against Kanu claimed that the broadcasts (made from an unnamed foreign soil) “had impact in Nigeria”, they failed to expressly state that the broadcasts are “also a crime in the foreign country where they were made” (double criminality). This is a key omission that rendered all the pertinent charges incompetent, thus robbing the court of the requisite jurisdiction to have subjected Kanu to trial, without more.

Further, the Supreme Court's decision to allow the trial to continue was predicated on the general jurisdiction of Federal High Courts; it was not a final determination on the applicable substantive law for the trial on the merits. So, when the trial de novo (anew) was ultimately underway before Justice Omotosho, the court was bound to first determine the applicable law in use, and this was exactly what Kanu had requested in his preliminary objection which the court flatly refused to determine. In Military Governor of Lagos State v. Ojukwu, judicial reassignment post-recusal mandated fresh hearings. Thus, Kanu’s trial was not “pending” under Section 97 TPPA 2022 but a new proceeding under the TPPA 2022. This also comports with Section 36(12) Constitution under which offenses are triable only under a “written law in force” at the time or moment of trial. TPAA 2013 was no longer in force in 2025 when Kanu’s trial actually commenced.

Therefore, for the court to assert extraterritorial jurisdiction, the prosecution was required to plead and prove that Kanu’s alleged acts (broadcasts) constituted a criminal offence both in Nigeria, and also in the United Kingdom or Kenya, which were the places Kanu was domiciled between 2018 and 2021 when the broadcasts were alleged to have been made (according to the charge sheet).

It is, therefore, left to conjecture that the only reason the prosecution was dodgy on the law that applied was this: Knowing that the broadcasts were made from either Britain (where Kanu is a citizen) or Kenya (where he was itinerant), it was clear to the prosecution that such acts do not constitute acts of terrorism under the domestic laws of those countries, otherwise Kanu would have been arrested and tried in either Britain or Kenya.

Thus, the failure to specify the foreign situs or country where the broadcasts were made was profoundly prejudicial to Kanu. The charges also failed the muster of Section 220 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015 (ACJA) which bars jurisdiction if the charges omitted a legally required information that could mislead the defendant on how to frame his defense. The Supreme Court in Yakubu v FRN (2020) and other authorities, has consistently held that a charge which fails to disclose an essential ingredient of the offence is void and confers no jurisdiction on the court.

It is on the basis of these reasons (plus more) that I had insisted from day one that the Federal High Court lacked jurisdiction to have proceeded with Kanu’s trial.

180

128

23 days ago

@AloyEjimakor Great post

Princevejims retweeted

24 days ago

The “poor” Nigerians who are actually in majority should be profoundly disturbed by what Nyesom Wike said in this screenshot. This is the sort of mindset possessed of Nigeria’s leaders that fuels the agitation for a separate State. No sane person, poor or rich, would desire to remain in the same country with people that reason like this. And a reckless statement like this makes mockery of the so-called elections, and even validates the calls for boycott.

AloyEjimakor's tweet photo. The “poor” Nigerians who are actually in majority should be profoundly disturbed by what Nyesom Wike said in this screenshot.

This is the sort of mindset possessed of Nigeria’s leaders that fuels the agitation for a separate State.

No sane person, poor or rich, would desire to remain in the same country with people that reason like this.

And a reckless statement like this makes mockery of the so-called elections, and even validates the calls for boycott.

280

254

11K

24 days ago

@AloyEjimakor A mindset like this is why so many have lost faith in elections. If votes don’t matter, why show up?

Princevejims retweeted

about 1 month ago

A video surfaces, showing shocking military brutality against civilians during the Civil War. Wanton looting of domestic properties and fatal shooting of an unarmed youth can be seen.

122

274

35K

Princevejims retweeted