We are Pro-Colorado. Pro-Public Education. Pro-Community. Pro-Opportunity. Pro-Learning. Last but not least, we're Pro-Students, Pro-Parents & Pro-Educators.
@MichaelBennet We're skeptical based on first-hand experience. A group of Coloradans came prepared to a meeting to discuss specifics about one of your ed bills. Your ed policy rep basically dismissed their questions and implied that you know more about education than they do. Not a good look.
@schotts@dcsdk12@JeffcoSchoolsCo Don't one or two of those people who were elected have very close ties to charter schools? Are you opposed to charter schools, too?
@KBBColorado@Bob4Colorado (3) board directors denied him that. He made the right decision. Granting automatic 10 year extensions to existing five-year contracts, tripling the term with no further review whatsoever, is fiscally and legally irresponsible.
@KBBColorado@Bob4Colorado (2) the resolution that was his idea, not the districts. The directors said they were given legal advice that caused them to question the legality of the resolution. Dir Moore requested an executive session to discuss the legality, and his fellow extremist anti-public education
@KBBColorado@CactusSharpie@Bob4Colorado Wow. So vindictive. You are lying by misrepresenting what happened. That presentation was sloppy and the proposal left tons of unanswered questions. As a member of the State Board of Education, why don't you support effective meetings and governance?
@KBBColorado@Bob4Colorado You should’ve posted his whole comment. Bob was awesome! But speaking of embarrassing yourself, shouldn’t a member of the State Board of Education have a little more decency than to send out texts full of lies like this? (through your anti public education political group )
@KBBColorado@Bob4Colorado DCSD's Moore was clear about the proposal's merit. Had specific questions and asked for an Executive Session. He was voted down. Now it looks like a set-up to stir up conflict. Charters and district-run schools CAN coexist. Stop manufacturing outrage.
@KBBColorado@Bob4Colorado Shame on YOU, @KBBColorado. Advance CO Action attacked one of its conservative allies because he agreed a policy change needed more review. He supports charters & choice, but not sloppy governance. As a State Board official, you should set an example of integrity for the kids.
Check out this opportunity for ANYONE to get FREE coaching on writing. Anyone 13 years old, so students, adults, teens - check out this program in the Boulder Public Library District https://t.co/goKbbeoVxu
School Board Members, Parents, Educators, & Industry Professionals - Who else has Learning Loss on their radar? Check out Chalkbeat Ideas: New Insights from Learning Loss Data with Emily Oster https://t.co/cZDv1YpzQs
My son can’t even go on a field trip or take an Advil without my consent. So why do schools think they have the right to “transition” a child without asking Mom & Dad?
Tradition, precedent, and the Constitution are on the side of parents.
Compliments to @noellecook_com for pointing out the importance of accurate info, despite an account seemingly obsessed with Bucks County, PA going on a rant.
There’s a viral claim that no Moms for Liberty–endorsed candidates won “contested” school-board races this week. That claim is false. Not many wins, but not zero.
A short 🧵 on how selective wording can turn misinformation into something that sounds true.
@ThePoliticalHQ "No M4L candidate won a single contested seat anywhere in the United States."
I don't think that's true. Here is an example from 2024. The underlined person is from the Wright county chapter of Moms for Liberty. While many M4L candidates lost, I'm sure there are other examples.
@MomJeans44@noellecook_com Seriously? Because Bucks County was successful they are no longer a national force? That’s just naive. Fabulous for Bucks County!!!! Get your facts right on the rest of the country.
@RhondaDodson18 Not true everywhere. MFL endorsed candidates won contested races this week in some places, like Colorado. It IS true that many MFL candidates or allies WERE defeated. Just not “all.” (We have receipts; we verify facts before we post.)
@itsweezie@Moms4Liberty Not true everywhere. MFL endorsed candidates won contested races this week in some places, like Colorado. It IS true that many MFL candidates or allies WERE defeated. Just not “all.” (We have receipts; we verify facts before we post.)
@seancrampsie Not true everywhere. MFL endorsed candidates won contested races this week in some places, like Colorado. It IS true that many MFL candidates or allies WERE defeated. Just not “all.” (We have receipts; we verify facts before we post.)
@LinusAlso Not true everywhere. MFL endorsed candidates won contested races this week in some places, like Colorado. It IS true that many MFL candidates or allies WERE defeated. Just not “all.” (We have receipts; we verify facts before we post.)