My new book is 'Media and the Power of Knowledge'. It is partly based on lectures I've given over the last 15 years. It updates McLuhan for the age of @X: https://t.co/xtKx0LNltd
The difference between being principled and being ignorant is that the principled person ignores on purpose, whereas the ignorant person has no choice.
@mgekelly Put it this way: AI has the data of all authors, whose words are not even fully exploited by the authors themselves. I think there's plenty of room for AI innovation, if we don't build too many of our own biases into its operations.
Early alert for my next book, 'Reforming the Governance of Science', which revisits my 'The Governance of Science' after a quarter-century: https://t.co/ubpVObhXHA
@readwithai I think it's true across all academic disciplines. It helps explain why academics believe their work can be judged only by one of their own (aka 'peer review').
One of the most liberating -- and politically destabilizing -- features of our #PostTruth era is that virtually everyone (not just esoteric Leftists) makes use of deconstruction and the other forms of intellectual subversion developed under #Postmodernism.
Academic publishers should learn that human authors treat their own works pretty much as AI does, namely, as raw material for future works. This is where the classic 'commodification' of knowledge (blah, blah) breaks down and intellectual property law is sent into a tailspin.
One place where the late Bruno Latour and I definitely agreed is that the segregation of 'quantitative' and 'qualitative' methods has retarded the advance of the social sciences.
@FranOsrecki No, because 'real' philosophical importance has a certain longevity that speaks to something deep about a society's self-understanding - beyond the philosophy's ultimate epistemic value.
@FranOsrecki Butler and Zizek are 'actually' important philosophers. The question is whether they're 'really' important. The sociology of knowledge can address both by adopting different timeframes.
I am still wedded to the idea that the best history is a certain way of doing philosophy -- 'philosophy teaching by examples', perhaps. It is ultimately preoccupied with decisions and consequences, both factual and counterfactual. #Thucydides
I owe Nigel Farage an apology.
During last night’s Newsnight we covered the murder of Henry Nowak and the political reaction to the case, including discussing Nigel Farage’s comments about “pure, cold rage”.
However I referred to “white cold rage”. This was a mistake on my part, a misremembering of the quote. It didn’t change the content of the interview but I should have got the quote right. I apologise to Nigel Farage for this.